How does the severity of the situation affect bystander intervention?

The severity of the situation can impact bystander intervention in various ways.

In situations where the severity of the situation is high, such as witnessing a violent crime or a medical emergency, bystanders are more likely to intervene. This is known as the "arousal cost-reward model" which suggests that the greater the arousal or emotional response to a situation, the more likely an individual is to intervene. In these situations, bystanders may feel a sense of responsibility to help and may also believe that their assistance is necessary to prevent harm.

However, in situations where the severity of the situation is low, such as witnessing a minor accident or a verbal argument, bystanders are less likely to intervene. This is known as the "diffusion of responsibility" where individuals feel less personal responsibility to intervene if there are others present. Bystanders may also believe that someone else will intervene or that the situation is not serious enough to require their assistance.

Furthermore, the relationship between the bystander and the victim can also impact intervention. Research suggests that bystanders are more likely to intervene if they have a personal connection to the victim or if the victim is perceived as being similar to themselves.

In conclusion, the severity of the situation can impact bystander intervention in various ways. While high severity situations may increase the likelihood of intervention, low severity situations and the presence of others can decrease the likelihood of intervention. Understanding these factors can help to promote greater bystander intervention in a range of situations.