TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

46.3.2 Society: Enslavement, Class and Devshirme

OCR Specification focus:
‘A rigid class system and the Devshirme shaped society; enslavement coexisted with new opportunities.’

The Ottoman Empire’s society was shaped by a unique blend of enslavement, social hierarchy, and the Devshirme system, which together created both stability and tension.

The Ottoman Class System

The Ottoman social order was highly stratified, reflecting the empire’s reliance on both tradition and innovation. Central to this system was the division between the ruling elite and the subject population.

The Ruling Class: Askeri

The Askeri (military-administrative elite) formed the ruling class, exempt from taxation. It included:

  • Military officials such as the Janissaries and Sipahis.

  • Administrative elites, including viziers and court officials.

  • Religious leaders, such as the ulema, who legitimised the Sultan’s authority.

Their loyalty was essential to sustaining Ottoman absolutism, and their privileged position reinforced the empire’s rigid hierarchy.

The Subject Class: Reaya

The Reaya (flock/subjects) comprised the majority of the population. They were taxpayers who sustained the state’s finances and included:

  • Peasants, tied to land through the timar system.

  • Merchants and artisans, largely concentrated in towns.

  • Non-Muslim communities, often organised into millets, granted autonomy but subject to extra taxation.

The sharp division between Askeri and Reaya highlighted the rigidity of Ottoman class structures.

Enslavement in Ottoman Society

Slavery played a significant role in Ottoman governance and economy. Enslaved individuals were not always confined to servitude but could achieve social advancement.

Military and Administrative Slavery

The Ottomans relied on military slavery as a mechanism for recruitment and loyalty. Slaves taken in war or through levies were trained for service. Notably:

  • The Janissaries, formed from slaves recruited via the Devshirme, became the empire’s elite infantry.

  • Administrative slaves staffed the bureaucracy, including roles in the palace and harem.

Domestic and Economic Slavery

Enslavement also extended to households and the economy. Many were employed as agricultural labourers, artisans, or domestic servants. While their legal status was restricted, opportunities for advancement existed, particularly for those connected to the palace system.

Enslavement: The condition in which individuals were legally owned and controlled, often obtained through conquest, raiding, or tribute, and utilised in military, administrative, or domestic service.

The Devshirme System

Perhaps the most distinctive institution in Ottoman society was the Devshirme (child levy), a practice central to both enslavement and opportunity.

Origins and Operation

Beginning in the 14th century, the Devshirme recruited boys, mainly from Christian populations in the Balkans, who were:

  • Seized in periodic levies.

  • Converted to Islam.

  • Trained in elite schools for military or administrative service.

This system created a disciplined cadre directly loyal to the Sultan, bypassing hereditary nobility.

Ottoman miniature (c. 16th century) showing officials recording boys for the devşirme levy, with families present and recruits identifiable in uniform colours. It illustrates the administrative, coercive nature of selection before the boys’ conversion and training. Some narrative details visible in the art (e.g., parental appeals) extend beyond the syllabus but help contextualise the process. Source

Paths of Advancement

Boys taken through the Devshirme could rise to positions of immense power:

  • Military track: Service in the Janissaries, the backbone of Ottoman infantry.

  • Administrative track: Placement in palace schools, leading to posts such as Grand Vizier or provincial governor.

The Devshirme blurred the line between slavery and opportunity, as many of its recruits achieved prestige, wealth, and authority.

Devshirme: A levy of Christian boys, converted to Islam and trained for military or administrative service, forming an elite corps central to Ottoman governance.

Janissaries and Social Mobility

The Janissaries, products of the Devshirme, embodied the contradictions of Ottoman society. While recruited as slaves, they held elite status within the military hierarchy.

Discipline and Loyalty

The Janissaries were subject to strict training and discipline. Their celibacy, barracks life, and devotion to the Sultan made them a uniquely loyal force.

Jacopo Ligozzi’s “A Janissary ‘of War’ with a Lion” (c. 1577–80) depicts a Janissary with characteristic headgear and arms, representing the corps’ elite identity. The lion motif is an artistic emblem and not required by the syllabus. High-resolution imagery supports close study of uniform details relevant to OCR learners. Source

Decline and Transformation

Over time, the Janissaries’ privileged position eroded their distinctiveness:

  • They increasingly married and integrated into urban society.

  • Their hereditary claims undermined the meritocratic origins of the system.

Nevertheless, their legacy illustrates how slavery could coexist with privilege and mobility.

Coexistence of Enslavement and Opportunity

Ottoman society balanced rigidity and flexibility:

  • Enslavement remained a source of manpower and control.

  • The class system reinforced divisions, with the Askeri dominant over the Reaya.

  • The Devshirme provided a unique pathway for Christian-born subjects to ascend to power.

This coexistence reflected the empire’s pragmatic governance — using enslavement not merely for labour, but as a political tool to sustain imperial expansion and absolutism.

Key Impacts on Society

The influence of enslavement and the Devshirme extended into broader social life:

  • It reinforced the Sultan’s authority by creating a class entirely dependent on him.

  • It limited the role of hereditary nobility, preventing rivals to the throne.

  • It integrated diverse populations into the state, albeit through coercive means.

Thus, Ottoman society was both rigidly hierarchical and paradoxically open to upward mobility for select individuals, particularly those channelled through the Devshirme system.

FAQ

Reactions were mixed. Some families tried to hide their sons, while others accepted the levy as an unavoidable tax. In certain cases, parents saw it as an opportunity for their children to achieve advancement within the Ottoman system.

Unlike most enslaved individuals, Janissary recruits were subject to systematic training, Islamic education, and strict military discipline. They were forbidden to marry initially and lived in barracks, which reinforced their loyalty to the Sultan.

No, the levy specifically targeted Christian populations, particularly in the Balkans. Muslim families were exempt. This distinction reinforced the empire’s use of diversity as a tool of governance while sparing Muslim subjects from this burden.

The Enderun provided advanced education for select recruits identified as capable of administrative or political roles. Training included languages, calligraphy, statecraft, and etiquette. Graduates could rise to become viziers or provincial governors.

Although the levy was resented, Ottoman rule often brought stability, protection of local religious institutions, and reduced feudal exploitation. Some communities viewed the empire as more predictable than rival Christian lords.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks):
What was the Devshirme system in the Ottoman Empire?

Mark Scheme:

  • 1 mark for identifying that it was a levy/recruitment of Christian boys.

  • 1 mark for noting they were converted to Islam and trained for military or administrative service.

Question 2 (6 marks):
Explain how the Devshirme system both reinforced the Ottoman class system and created opportunities for social mobility.

Mark Scheme:

  • Up to 2 marks for describing the rigid class divisions (Askeri elite vs. Reaya subjects).

  • Up to 2 marks for explaining how the Devshirme reinforced absolutism by creating loyal servants of the Sultan.

  • Up to 2 marks for explaining opportunities for social mobility (e.g., boys could rise to positions such as Janissary officers or Grand Vizier).

Award full marks (6) for answers that cover both reinforcement of class rigidity and the opening of opportunities, with accurate detail.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email