TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

46.4.1 Spain: North Africa, the Western Mediterranean and Moriscos

OCR Specification focus:
‘Threats to Spanish outposts, Aragon’s coast and links with Moriscos and Barbary corsairs shaped policy.’

Spanish anxieties over the Ottoman Empire’s westward advance focused on the Mediterranean, North Africa, and internal religious minorities. These pressures transformed royal policy and naval commitments.

Spain and the Ottoman Challenge

The sixteenth century witnessed the Ottoman Empire extending its maritime reach into the Western Mediterranean, threatening Spain’s coastal and colonial interests. Spain faced an empire that combined military strength with naval power, supported by corsair allies. This produced strategic dilemmas: protect outposts in North Africa, defend Aragon’s coastline, and manage the Morisco population within Spain itself.

The Strategic Importance of North Africa

North Africa became a frontline for Spanish-Ottoman rivalry.

  • Spanish outposts such as Oran, Tunis, and Tripoli were vital bases designed to block Ottoman expansion and control key trade routes.

  • The Ottoman fleet and local rulers in Algiers worked to expel Spanish influence, often with corsair support.

  • The Barbary corsairs operated from North African ports, raiding Spanish shipping and coastal villages.

Barbary corsairs: Muslim privateers based in North Africa, often allied with the Ottoman Empire, who attacked Christian shipping and settlements across the Mediterranean.

The Ottomans, through their naval commanders such as Barbarossa Hayreddin Pasha, transformed Algiers into a powerful base, undermining Spanish security and requiring costly military responses.

The Western Mediterranean as a Battleground

Spain’s control of the Western Mediterranean was central to maintaining communications between Italy, Spain, and its Atlantic possessions. Ottoman incursions threatened this delicate network.
Key factors included:

  • The raiding capacity of corsairs, which disrupted Spanish commerce and instilled fear along coastal communities.

A nineteenth-century reproduction of a sixteenth-century galley, the principal platform for corsair raids in the Western Mediterranean. Its oar-powered design made it fast and manoeuvrable for coastal strikes and pursuit. The engraving style adds artistic flourishes, but the hull form and oar arrangement remain clear and educational. Source

  • The challenge of defending Aragon’s coast, particularly vulnerable due to limited natural defences.

  • Spanish reliance on galleys and fortresses to project strength, which required extensive financial investment.

Moriscos and Internal Vulnerability

Beyond external threats, the Spanish Crown feared the disloyalty of the Moriscos (Muslims forcibly converted to Christianity after 1502).

  • Many Moriscos were suspected of collaborating with Ottoman forces and Barbary corsairs.

  • Uprisings, such as the Alpujarras Revolt (1568–71), intensified royal suspicion.

A labelled map of the Alpujarras Revolt (1568–1571) showing uprising zones in the Kingdom of Granada. It clarifies the geographical focus of Morisco unrest that preoccupied Philip II’s government. The map includes Spanish-language labels but remains straightforward and uncluttered. Source

  • The perception of an “enemy within” complicated Spain’s Mediterranean strategy, as resources were divided between external defence and internal repression.

Moriscos: Former Muslims in Spain who had converted to Christianity, often under duress, but retained elements of Islamic culture, making them targets of suspicion.

Their existence created a dual-front problem: Spain had to guard against both Ottoman incursions and potential collaboration from within its borders.

Spain’s Strategic Responses

Spain employed multiple strategies to counter Ottoman expansion and corsair raids.

Defensive and Offensive Measures

  • Fortification of coastal towns and construction of watchtowers along vulnerable stretches of the Aragonese and Andalusian coasts.

  • Naval campaigns, often under commanders like Don John of Austria, to intercept corsairs and challenge Ottoman fleets.

  • Occasional attempts to seize Ottoman-controlled bases in North Africa, though these were costly and often temporary successes.

The Cost of Mediterranean Commitment

Maintaining a permanent naval presence was an enormous financial burden. Spanish galleys had to be manned, supplied, and coordinated, requiring the constant mobilisation of resources.

  • Spain’s commitment in the Mediterranean stretched royal finances, already strained by wars against France and the Dutch Revolt.

  • The need to protect both Atlantic trade routes and Mediterranean territories created strategic overextension.

The Ottoman-Spanish Rivalry in Policy

The Spanish monarchy integrated Mediterranean defence into its wider imperial policy.

  • The Ottoman threat to Aragon’s coast forced continual investment in local defences.

  • Fear of Ottoman-Morisco collaboration shaped harsh policies towards Moriscos, culminating in expulsions in the early seventeenth century.

  • Coordination with allies, such as the Papacy and Venice, sometimes bolstered Spain’s ability to resist Ottoman naval dominance.

Interconnection of Threats

The specification highlights the interconnected nature of Spain’s Mediterranean challenges:

  • Threats to Spanish outposts in North Africa eroded Spain’s frontier security.

  • Aragon’s coastline remained a vulnerable zone, where local populations felt the direct impact of corsair raids.

  • Links between Moriscos and Barbary corsairs heightened fears of subversion and made internal security inseparable from foreign policy.

Key Features of Spanish Vulnerability

  • Fragmented defences and overextension across two oceans.

  • Dependence on expensive galleys that were less versatile than Ottoman fleets.

  • The dual challenge of external raids and internal unrest.

Spain’s Mediterranean policy thus rested on constant vigilance, naval readiness, and repression of minorities, shaped by the interplay of Ottoman strength and Spanish insecurity.

FAQ

Oran, captured by Spain in 1509, provided a strategic base against Ottoman-backed corsairs in the western Mediterranean. Its harbour allowed the Spanish navy to project power across the Maghreb.

The fortress at Oran also symbolised Christian dominance over former Muslim lands, reinforcing Spain’s religious-political mission. However, its maintenance was costly and often required subsidies from Castile.

Corsair raids created persistent insecurity for coastal communities. Villages were attacked, inhabitants enslaved, and property plundered.

To counter this:

  • Coastal watchtowers were constructed to give early warning.

  • Local militias were raised to respond quickly.

  • Some populations migrated inland, leaving sections of coast underpopulated.

The mountainous terrain of the Alpujarras in Granada provided natural defences for rebels. Narrow passes and high valleys allowed Moriscos to conduct guerrilla-style resistance.

Spanish forces faced logistical challenges: harsh winters, difficulty transporting artillery, and constant ambushes. This terrain extended the rebellion, forcing Philip II to send experienced commanders like Don John of Austria to suppress it.

While the Moriscos appealed for Ottoman aid, direct large-scale intervention never materialised. However, Ottoman-controlled Algiers provided indirect support.

  • Corsair raids distracted Spanish resources.

  • Small supplies of arms reached rebels through Mediterranean smuggling routes.

  • Symbolic promises of assistance encouraged Morisco determination, even if material support was limited.

Before the revolt, the Crown maintained a degree of tolerance, enforcing conversion but allowing limited cultural practices. After the rebellion, attitudes hardened.

Moriscos were increasingly viewed as an irredeemable threat, allegedly conspiring with external enemies. This shift marked the start of harsher assimilation policies, culminating in their expulsion under Philip III in 1609.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)
Name one Spanish North African outpost and one internal minority group that shaped Spanish policy in the Western Mediterranean during the sixteenth century.

Mark Scheme:

  • 1 mark for identifying a Spanish North African outpost, e.g. Oran, Tunis, or Tripoli.

  • 1 mark for identifying the internal minority group, e.g. Moriscos.

Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain how links between the Moriscos and Barbary corsairs influenced Spanish policies in the sixteenth century.

Mark Scheme:

  • 1–2 marks: Limited knowledge shown. General statement about Moriscos being distrusted or about corsair raids, with little or no clear link to policy.

  • 3–4 marks: Some knowledge and explanation. Reference to suspicions of Moriscos collaborating with Barbary corsairs and how this increased Crown anxiety, leading to greater repression or local defensive measures. Some detail provided but may lack depth.

  • 5–6 marks: Clear and developed explanation. Specific reference to the Morisco threat (e.g. Alpujarras Revolt 1568–71) combined with corsair raids, showing how these dual pressures influenced Spanish policy towards both coastal defence (fortifications, naval patrols) and internal control (harsh treatment, eventual expulsion). Well-supported with accurate examples.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email