OCR Specification focus:
‘Henry’s Navarre inheritance, religious affiliation and conversion framed legitimacy and support.’
Henry IV’s inheritance of Navarre, his shifting religious stance, and his eventual conversion to Catholicism directly shaped his legitimacy and the political stability of France.
The Navarre Inheritance
Henry of Navarre (later Henry IV of France) inherited the throne of Navarre in 1572 following his mother Jeanne d’Albret’s death.

A labelled map of Lower Navarre (Ultrapuertos) in the early sixteenth century. It highlights the cross-Pyrenean kingdom that Henry inherited, explaining its strategic sensitivity between France and Spain. Source
This inheritance was significant for several reasons:
Dynastic Link: As a Bourbon, Henry was part of a cadet branch of the French royal family. This gave him a legitimate claim to the French throne upon the extinction of the Valois line.
Strategic Position: Navarre’s location at the Pyrenean frontier was geopolitically sensitive, influencing relations with both Spain and France.
Religious Symbolism: The Navarrese court had become a centre for Protestant (Huguenot) identity in France, bolstering Henry’s reputation as a leader of the Protestant cause.
Huguenots: French Protestants influenced by Calvinist theology who played a central role in the French Wars of Religion.
Henry’s inheritance therefore carried dual weight: it offered him dynastic legitimacy, yet it also tied him to the Protestant minority, creating tensions in a predominantly Catholic realm.
Religious Affiliation and Identity
Henry’s religious affiliation was crucial in determining both his alliances and his threats.
Early Protestant Commitment
Raised under Jeanne d’Albret’s Protestant influence, Henry was strongly associated with Calvinism in his youth.
His marriage in 1572 to Margaret of Valois, intended as a reconciliation between Catholics and Protestants, instead became the setting for the Massacre of St Bartholomew’s Day. Henry narrowly escaped death, forced to conform outwardly to Catholicism.
Shifting Confessional Position
Between 1572 and 1593, Henry’s position fluctuated between Catholicism and Protestantism. He publicly reverted to Protestantism after escaping the Catholic court in 1576.
As a Protestant claimant to the French throne after Henry III’s assassination in 1589, he alienated much of Catholic France. His claim was fiercely resisted by the Catholic League, supported by Spain.
Religious Pragmatism
Henry’s confessional changes reflected political calculation rather than spiritual conviction. His willingness to adapt marked him as a pragmatic rather than a dogmatic leader.
Conversion to Catholicism (1593)
The turning point in Henry’s legitimacy came in 1593 when he converted to Catholicism.

An engraving of Henry IV’s abjuration at Saint-Denis in 1593 before church authorities. It captures the formal renunciation of Protestantism, highlighting the political–religious gravity of his conversion. Source
The conversion was motivated by necessity: without Catholic support, Henry could not consolidate power across a predominantly Catholic nation.
His famous phrase — though possibly apocryphal — “Paris is worth a Mass” illustrates his political pragmatism.
With this act, Henry neutralised much of the Catholic League’s opposition and disarmed Spain’s justification for intervention.
Catholic League: A militant Catholic organisation formed in 1576 to defend Catholicism in France and oppose Protestant succession, heavily supported by Spain and the Guise family.
By adopting Catholicism, Henry aligned himself with the faith of the majority, securing broader national acceptance.
Legitimacy and Political Stability
Henry’s conversion was more than a personal act of faith: it was central to the restoration of the monarchy’s credibility.
Enhanced Monarchical Authority
His acceptance by the Catholic majority allowed him to be formally crowned at Chartres in 1594.

Engraving of the sacre (coronation) of Henry IV in Chartres Cathedral, 1594. Held in Chartres rather than Reims due to League control, this rite signalled broad acceptance after his conversion. Source
The papal absolution granted in 1595 removed doubts over the legitimacy of his reign.
Consolidation of Support
Nobles and provinces that had resisted his claim now offered allegiance, reducing internal conflict.
The end of factional disputes within France facilitated the broader settlement of the civil wars.
International Recognition
Conversion improved France’s standing in Catholic Europe, particularly in countering Spain’s propaganda.
It demonstrated Henry’s capacity to act as a unifier, enhancing France’s diplomatic credibility.
Key Themes of the Subtopic
Religion as a Tool of Legitimacy
Henry’s path to power underscores how religion in sixteenth-century France was inseparable from political authority. His conversion was a calculated act to secure the throne.
Dynastic Fragility
His Navarre inheritance positioned him as heir but simultaneously associated him with the minority Protestant tradition, exacerbating tensions in a fractured kingdom.
Pragmatism over Principle
Henry’s willingness to change faith illustrates the balance between ideology and political necessity, reflecting the broader theme of state-building through compromise.
Summary Points for Study
Henry inherited Navarre in 1572, linking him dynastically to the French crown while associating him with Protestantism.
His early Protestant commitment was shaped by Jeanne d’Albret and the Huguenot cause.
Forced conversions and shifting affiliations reflected the volatile religious climate.
His definitive conversion to Catholicism in 1593 was pivotal in consolidating legitimacy.
Conversion secured papal approval, noble loyalty, and broader public support.
Religion and politics were intertwined: Henry’s pragmatism restored central authority and stabilised France after decades of civil war.
FAQ
Navarre was originally an independent Pyrenean kingdom. In 1512, Ferdinand of Aragon invaded and annexed Upper Navarre south of the Pyrenees, incorporating it into Spain.
The Bourbons retained Lower Navarre (north of the Pyrenees), which became Henry’s inheritance. This division meant Navarre was a frontier territory, constantly shaped by Franco-Spanish rivalry.
The marriage in 1572 to Margaret, sister of King Charles IX, linked Henry more closely to the Valois dynasty.
It strengthened his dynastic claim through marital ties.
However, it also placed him at the heart of Catholic hostility, leading to his forced conversion during the St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre.
Although conversion reassured many, some Catholic nobles doubted Henry’s sincerity.
His reputation as a Protestant leader created suspicion.
The Guise family and staunch Catholic League members still preferred a rival Catholic claimant.
Only papal absolution in 1595 gradually reduced these doubts.
Papal recognition was essential for Catholic Europe to accept Henry as legitimate.
In 1595, Pope Clement VIII granted absolution, lifting excommunication.
This confirmed Henry as the rightful king in the eyes of international Catholic powers.
It weakened Spanish claims that France should reject a former heretic on the throne.
Henry embraced public Catholic rituals to demonstrate loyalty to the majority faith.
He attended Masses regularly in Paris to be seen as devout.
He promoted Catholic festivals and ceremonies to show unity.
By holding his coronation at Chartres Cathedral in 1594, he visually reinforced his bond with Catholic tradition despite the unusual location.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
In what year did Henry of Navarre convert to Catholicism?
Mark Scheme:
1 mark for identifying the correct year.
Correct answer: 1593 = 2 marks.
Partial credit: Any other year connected with Henry IV’s reign but not 1593 (e.g. 1594 coronation, 1598 Edict of Nantes) = 0 marks.
Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain how Henry IV’s Navarre inheritance and religious conversion influenced his legitimacy as king of France.
Mark Scheme:
Up to 2 marks for knowledge of Henry’s Navarre inheritance (e.g. dynastic link as Bourbon heir; Protestant associations; strategic Pyrenean frontier position).
Up to 2 marks for knowledge of his religious affiliation/conversion (e.g. Protestant background; abjuration at Saint-Denis in 1593; phrase “Paris is worth a Mass”).
Up to 2 marks for analysis of how these factors shaped legitimacy (e.g. inheritance gave dynastic claim but alienated Catholics; conversion allowed papal recognition, coronation, and wider noble/clerical support).
Levels of response:
5–6 marks: Well-developed explanation covering both inheritance and conversion, with clear analysis of their effect on legitimacy.
3–4 marks: Some explanation, though one factor may be underdeveloped; some analysis attempted.
1–2 marks: Simple or generalised points, largely descriptive with limited reference to legitimacy.
0 marks: No relevant material.