TutorChase logo
Login
AP Microeconomics Notes

6.4.1 Per-Unit Taxes and Subsidies in Market Outcomes

AP Syllabus focus: ‘Per-unit taxes and subsidies affect consumer price, firm revenue, equilibrium quantity, surplus, deadweight loss, and government revenue or cost.’

Per-unit (specific) taxes and subsidies create a constant wedge per unit traded. This wedge changes prices paid and received, reallocates surplus, alters equilibrium quantity, and typically generates deadweight loss.

Core idea: a per-unit wedge changes incentives

A per-unit tax raises the cost of trading each unit by a fixed dollar amount; a per-unit subsidy lowers it by a fixed dollar amount. In competitive markets, these policies shift the relevant curve and create a gap between what buyers pay and what sellers receive.

Per-unit (specific) tax: A tax of a fixed amount per unit sold that drives a wedge between the price consumers pay and the price firms receive.

With a tax, consumers face a higher effective price, and firms effectively receive a lower net-of-tax price. With a subsidy, consumers face a lower effective price, and firms receive a higher effective price (inclusive of the subsidy).

Graph mechanics (supply–demand model)

Per-unit tax

  • Model it as an upward/left shift of supply by the tax amount (if imposed on sellers), or a downward/left shift of demand (if imposed on buyers).

  • The market result is equivalent either way: the tax creates a wedge and reduces quantity.

Tax wedge=PcPp=t \text{Tax wedge} = P_c - P_p = t

Pc P_c = price paid by consumers (dollars per unit)

Pp P_p = price received by producers net of tax (dollars per unit)

t t = per-unit tax (dollars per unit)

This wedge is central for identifying consumer price, firm (producer) revenue per unit, and the resulting changes in surplus and quantity.

Pasted image

This supply–demand diagram shows a per-unit tax creating a vertical wedge between the price consumers pay and the price producers receive. The labeled shift from PeP_e to PcP_c (buyers) and to PpP_p (sellers) illustrates how the tax drives a gap of size tt and reduces the equilibrium quantity from QeQ_e to QtQ_t. Source

Per-unit subsidy

  • Model it as a downward/right shift of supply by the subsidy amount (if paid to sellers), or an upward/right shift of demand (if paid to buyers).

  • A subsidy creates a wedge in the opposite direction: the buyer price is below the seller price.

Market outcomes to track (AP focus)

Consumer price and firm revenue

  • Consumer price (price paid): rises with a tax; falls with a subsidy.

  • Firm revenue (price received):

    • With a tax, firms receive the net price PpP_p (lower than PcP_c).

    • With a subsidy, firms receive a higher effective price than consumers pay (the difference is funded by government).

Equilibrium quantity

  • A per-unit tax decreases equilibrium quantity because mutually beneficial trades at the margin are deterred.

  • A per-unit subsidy increases equilibrium quantity because additional units become privately worthwhile to buy/sell.

Pasted image

This diagram shows a per-unit production subsidy shifting the supply curve outward (from SdS_d to SsS_s), increasing the quantity supplied from Q1Q_1 to Q3Q_3 at the prevailing price line. It also highlights that the price received by producers can exceed the market price by the subsidy amount, with the difference financed by the government. The shaded region emphasizes the efficiency cost that can arise when the subsidy induces extra production beyond the efficient benchmark. Source

Surplus changes and deadweight loss

  • Consumer surplus (CS):

    • Tax: typically falls (higher price paid and lower quantity).

    • Subsidy: typically rises (lower price paid and higher quantity).

  • Producer surplus (PS):

    • Tax: typically falls (lower net price received and lower quantity).

    • Subsidy: typically rises (higher effective price received and higher quantity).

  • Government revenue or cost:

    • Tax: government revenue equals tax per unit times the taxed quantity.

    • Subsidy: government cost equals subsidy per unit times the subsidised quantity.

  • Deadweight loss (DWL): the loss of total surplus from trades that no longer occur (tax) or from extra trades whose marginal benefit is below marginal cost (subsidy in a simple efficiency benchmark). DWL increases as the quantity distortion grows.

Incidence (who bears the burden/gets the benefit)

Tax incidence depends on relative elasticities:

  • More inelastic demand ⇒ consumers bear more of the tax (larger increase in PcP_c).

  • More inelastic supply ⇒ producers bear more (larger decrease in PpP_p). The same logic applies to subsidy benefits: the side with more inelastic behavior captures more of the per-unit subsidy via a more favorable price.

FAQ

Either approach is acceptable: a tax on sellers shifts supply up/left by the tax; a tax on buyers shifts demand down/left by the tax. The equilibrium wedge and quantity reduction are the same.

Because market prices adjust until quantity demanded equals quantity supplied with a wedge of $t$ between $P_c$ and $P_p$. Legal responsibility doesn’t determine economic incidence.

On AP graphs, producer outcomes use the net price received ($P_p$). Gross consumer spending is based on $P_c$; tax revenue is $(P_c-P_p)\times Q$.

Not in the standard competitive model with an upward-sloping supply and no externalities. The tax reduces net price and quantity, which lowers producer surplus.

Compare elasticities by curve steepness near equilibrium. The side with the steeper (more inelastic) curve experiences the larger price change relative to the pre-tax equilibrium.

Practice Questions

(2 marks) Explain how a per-unit tax affects (i) the price paid by consumers and (ii) the price received by producers in a competitive market.

  • 1 mark: States consumers pay a higher price (gross price increases).

  • 1 mark: States producers receive a lower net-of-tax price (price received decreases), creating a wedge.

(5 marks) A government introduces a per-unit subsidy in a competitive market. Using supply and demand analysis, explain the effects on equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, government spending, and deadweight loss.

  • 1 mark: Equilibrium quantity increases.

  • 1 mark: Consumer surplus increases (lower price paid and/or higher quantity).

  • 1 mark: Producer surplus increases (higher effective price received and/or higher quantity).

  • 1 mark: Government spending increases by subsidy per unit ×\times subsidised quantity.

  • 1 mark: Deadweight loss arises due to overproduction relative to the efficient benchmark (quantity distortion).

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email