AP Syllabus focus: ‘Compare how empires increased influence (1450–1750) and support your claim with specific, relevant evidence and clear explanation.’
Writing strong comparisons in AP World History requires more than listing similarities and differences. You must craft a defensible claim, choose matched evidence, and explain how that evidence proves a larger historical pattern.
What the skill demands (1450–1750)
A comparison argument explains how and why two (or more) empires increased influence in the early modern period, using specific, relevant evidence and clear explanation rather than generalities.
Core elements of a high-scoring comparison
A claim that directly compares (not two separate mini-essays)
Criteria (categories) that structure the comparison (e.g., military, administration, ideology)
Specific evidence for each side of the comparison
Reasoning that links evidence to the claim (cause/effect, function, significance)
Complexity when appropriate (qualified comparisons, exceptions, or multiple causes)
DEFINITION
Term: Comparison argument: a historical claim that evaluates at least two subjects using shared criteria and explains the significance of similarities and differences with evidence-based reasoning.
Building a defensible comparison claim
A strong thesis is comparative in its grammar and judgment. It should:
Name the two empires (or empire-types) and the time frame (1450–1750)
Unlock the rest of this chapter with a free account
Sign up for a free account to keep reading notes and practice questions.
FAQ
Choose empires that share at least two workable criteria (state structure, military capacity, legitimacy strategies).
If one is very different, narrow scope (a frontier region, one century, or one method of influence).
Switch to criteria where you can produce paired evidence.
If necessary, use fewer criteria but strengthen explanation of how each piece of evidence increased influence.
Use linking phrases in every paragraph: “Similarly…”, “In contrast…”, “Unlike…”.
Place paired evidence in adjacent sentences to keep the comparison visible.
Only enough to clarify why the method increased influence (e.g., governing diversity, frontier pressures).
Keep context subordinate to the claim; avoid long origin stories.
Anchor your claim to a specific phase (“early consolidation” vs “later administration”).
Use time markers (“by the seventeenth century…”) to show evolution without losing the comparative structure.
