AP Syllabus focus: ‘While Middle Eastern and Asian regions still produced manufactured goods, their share of global manufacturing declined during early industrialization.’
Industrialization reshaped world production unevenly. Even where artisans and workshops remained active in Asia and the Middle East, faster growth in mechanized output elsewhere caused a relative decline in their share of global manufacturing.
What “declined share” means (and what it does not)
A decline in global manufacturing share is primarily a relative change: other regions’ production rose much faster, shifting global totals, even if local manufacturing continued.
Area chart showing the changing relative shares of world manufacturing output from 1750 to 1950 (data attributed on the page to Paul Bairoch). It helps students see that “decline” often means a shrinking proportion of the global total, not necessarily zero production in the declining region. This is a useful visual for explaining why Asia’s and other regions’ shares fell as industrial output in Europe and the United States surged. Source
Deindustrialization: the weakening of a region’s manufacturing sector relative to other economic activities or competitors, often marked by the loss of markets, skills, and investment.
This concept helps explain why regions could still make textiles, metal goods, or ceramics yet become less competitive in international and even domestic markets.
Unlock the rest of this chapter with a free account
Sign up for a free account to keep reading notes and practice questions.
FAQ
They combine proxy indicators such as output estimates for key sectors (notably textiles and metals), wage/price series, urban craft employment, and trade flows.
Because records vary by region, estimates are often expressed as ranges and revised as new archival work appears.
Survival often depended on niches where handicraft retained advantages:
Luxury or highly customised goods
Strong local tastes and fashion
Repairs, finishing, and small-batch production
Geographic isolation limiting import reach
Not necessarily.
Some households gained access to cheaper imported goods, while others lost artisan incomes. Outcomes varied by region, class, and whether export sectors created alternative employment.
Preferences mattered when imported goods were perceived as more fashionable, uniform, or reliable.
Even when quality was lower, consistent sizing, predictable supply, and lower prices could shift demand toward imports over time.
Regions with abundant, easily mined coal (and later integrated energy-transport systems) could power factories more cheaply.
Where energy was costlier or harder to mobilise at scale, mechanised production faced higher barriers, slowing relative growth in manufacturing output.
