The "Battle for Production" had notable environmental impacts on German agriculture. The push for maximising output led to intensive farming practices, which included the widespread use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides. While these practices increased short-term productivity, they also resulted in soil degradation and reduced biodiversity in agricultural areas. The focus on monoculture, aiming for high yields of certain crops, further contributed to the depletion of soil nutrients and increased vulnerability to pests and diseases. These environmental consequences were largely overlooked by the Nazi regime, which prioritised immediate agricultural output over long-term environmental sustainability.

Nazi industrial policies significantly deviated from the traditional principles of a free-market economy. The state exerted extensive control over industrial production, setting targets, controlling the allocation of resources, and regulating prices and wages. This level of state intervention conflicted with the free-market principle of supply and demand determining production and prices. Additionally, the close relationship between the state and large industrialists, often involving coercion and preferential treatment, undermined competitive practices. The focus on industries crucial for war efforts, often at the expense of consumer industries, further highlighted the regime's prioritisation of state objectives over market-driven economic growth.

The emphasis on autarky in Nazi industrial policy had a profound impact on Germany's international trade. The drive towards self-sufficiency meant reducing dependence on foreign imports, particularly for strategic materials like oil, rubber, and certain metals. This shift led to a decrease in international trade and an increased focus on developing domestic industries to replace imports. However, the pursuit of autarky also had its drawbacks. It limited the availability of certain goods, leading to shortages and necessitating the development of synthetic alternatives. Additionally, the reduced emphasis on international trade weakened Germany's economic ties with other nations, further isolating it on the international stage.

The Nazi agricultural policies led to a significant transformation in the structure of farming in Germany. The emphasis on increased production and efficiency, as mandated by the "Battle for Production," incentivised the modernisation of farming techniques. However, these changes favoured larger farms, as they were more capable of meeting the high production quotas and investing in new technologies. Small farms struggled to compete, resulting in increased consolidation of land and a decline in the number of small, independent farmers. This shift towards larger, more industrialised farms marked a departure from the traditional, family-owned farms that had previously characterised German agriculture.

The Reich Food Estate regulated the agricultural market by setting prices for agricultural products, determining wages for farm workers, and controlling the distribution of agricultural supplies. This centralised approach aimed to stabilise the agricultural sector and align it with the broader economic goals of the Nazi regime. However, these regulations also had significant consequences. Fixed prices often did not reflect market conditions, leading to inefficiencies and disparities in the agricultural market. Additionally, the strict control over wages and prices limited the economic independence of farmers, making them more reliant on the state. This dependency was used by the regime to exert greater control over the rural population.