Saudi Arabia's vast oil wealth has been a significant tool in the hands of the ruling monarchy to maintain political stability and suppress demands for reforms. The revenues generated from oil exports have allowed the Saudi government to finance extensive welfare programmes, public services, and subsidies for its citizens, from housing to education and healthcare. This largesse has, in many ways, acted as a social contract: the populace receives economic benefits in exchange for political acquiescence. By ensuring a high standard of living and economic security for its citizens, the Saudi monarchy has effectively curtailed any widespread demands for democratic reforms or political participation.

Mussolini's “Battle for Grain” policy in Fascist Italy was part of his broader ambition to make Italy self-sufficient and independent from foreign influence. By promoting grain cultivation and reducing dependence on grain imports, Mussolini hoped to strengthen Italy's economic resilience and project an image of a self-reliant, powerful nation. Moreover, the policy served to bolster his populist appeal. By supporting domestic farmers and advocating for the nation's self-sufficiency, Mussolini could rally nationalist sentiments and portray himself and the Fascist regime as the champions of Italy's prosperity and security against foreign vulnerabilities.

Kemal Atatürk, the founder of modern Turkey, undertook a series of sweeping economic reforms to modernise the nation and align it with Western standards. He nationalised many resources and assets previously held by foreign entities, ensuring domestic control over the country's economic destiny. Atatürk also placed a strong emphasis on agricultural reforms, promoting modern farming techniques, and diversifying crops to boost yields. Industrialisation was another focus, with the establishment of state-owned enterprises in various sectors. By transforming Turkey's economic landscape, Atatürk laid the foundation for its growth and development in the 20th century, turning it into a robust and self-reliant nation.

The Latin American Debt Crisis in the 1980s was a tumultuous economic event that significantly destabilised many nations in the region. Many Latin American countries had borrowed heavily during the 1970s, lured by low global interest rates. However, when interest rates surged in the early 1980s, coupled with declining commodity prices, these nations found themselves unable to service their debts. Economic recessions, rising unemployment, and dwindling incomes ensued. The resulting socio-economic unrest made it easier for military regimes and authoritative figures, who promised stability and order, to seize power in countries like Argentina and Brazil. They presented themselves as the solution to the economic woes, often sidelining democratic institutions in the process.

Land inequities in pre-revolutionary Russia played a significant role in fuelling discontent among the masses. A small proportion of the population, comprising the nobility and wealthy landowners, controlled most of the arable land. This left the vast majority of peasants with insufficient land for sustenance. The Bolsheviks, under Lenin's leadership, recognised this discontent and effectively weaponised it for their political gain. They advocated for the redistribution of land and rallied support with slogans like “Land, Bread, Peace.” When the Bolsheviks did seize power, they acted upon their promise, nationalising land and distributing it among the peasantry, cementing their position as champions of the proletarian cause.