In the view of social constructivism, ICT is a pivotal factor in identity formation, where the self is increasingly defined by digital interactions and online presence. Social media platforms, for instance, are not just tools for communication; they provide spaces for individuals to craft and express their identities. This digital identity construction is influenced by the norms and values of the society individuals engage with online. Moreover, the feedback received from the online community can affirm or challenge these identities, leading to a dynamic where personal identity is both influencing and being influenced by the technological environment.

The social constructivist perspective considers surveillance technologies within the context of the societal values and power structures that give rise to them. It recognises that these technologies are not inherently neutral but are developed and deployed according to the priorities and norms of a given society, which can have significant ethical implications. For instance, a society valuing security over privacy may normalise extensive surveillance, impacting individual freedoms and rights. The use and regulation of surveillance technology, therefore, become a reflection of societal choices and compromises, emphasising the ethical deliberation in balancing collective safety with individual privacy.

A social constructivist would analyse ICT's influence on political processes by examining how these technologies reflect and reshape political engagement. For example, the use of social media in political campaigns transforms how politicians communicate with the electorate, allowing for more direct and personalised engagement. Similarly, ICT has given rise to new forms of activism, such as hashtag movements and online petitions, which change how political mobilisation occurs. These developments are not solely driven by the technology itself but by the society that utilises and adapts it to fulfil political needs and ambitions, demonstrating the co-constructive nature of technology and political processes.

Yes, from a social constructivist viewpoint, the global digital divide is not merely a technological issue but a reflection of underlying societal and economic disparities. The divide illustrates how access to and the use of ICT are shaped by social structures and, in turn, how these technologies shape social opportunities. For instance, regions with limited ICT access may fall behind in educational and economic advancements, exacerbating existing inequalities. Conversely, technology can be a tool for empowerment when societal efforts are directed towards bridging this gap, highlighting the mutual influence between technology and social equity.

The social constructivist approach would interpret planned obsolescence as a product of both societal consumerism and the economic strategies of corporations. Rather than being an inevitable technological progression, planned obsolescence is seen as a deliberate design and business choice influenced by a society that values newness and continuous improvement. This practice reflects and reinforces consumerist values, driving the cycle of purchasing and discarding that characterises modern economic interactions. Social constructivism would argue that both the market demands and the societal acceptance of such practices co-construct the phenomenon of planned obsolescence.