TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

1.7.3 Aethelred’s legislation and legal codes

OCR Specification focus:
‘The legislation of Aethelred (including the ‘10’ legal codes, monetary law, the role of the ‘jury’)’

Aethelred II’s legislative activity reflected both his desire to assert royal authority and his need to address the complex challenges of late Anglo-Saxon England, particularly the renewed Viking threat. His laws aimed to promote order, strengthen the monarchy’s control, and respond to both domestic and international pressures.

Aethelred (r. 978–1016) inherited a kingdom facing internal divisions and the danger of sustained Viking incursions. Lawmaking under his reign had to contend with these political realities while also adapting established West Saxon traditions to new circumstances. His legal corpus is notable for its breadth and number — traditionally identified as ten distinct legal codes — which address crime, trade, defence, and moral behaviour.

Historians refer to ten surviving legal codes from Aethelred’s reign, often designated by modern scholars as I–X Æthelred.

Opening of III Æthelred (the Wantage Code) in the Textus Roffensis (fol. 49v). The page shows Aethelred’s legislative text in Old English, as preserved in a 12th-century compilation. Palaeographical details visible on the folio exceed the syllabus but authenticate the code’s transmission. Source

These were issued across different assemblies and reflect cooperation between king, nobility, and the Church. Key features include:

  • Royal authority reinforced through reaffirmation of the king’s role as guarantor of justice.

  • Christian moral standards embedded in law, reflecting the influence of ecclesiastical advisors such as Archbishop Wulfstan.

  • Provisions for defence, especially against Viking raiders, with obligations for military service and contributions to fortifications.

  • Trade regulation, particularly to secure fair dealings and prevent fraud in markets.

  • Harsh penalties for treason and conspiracy, aimed at discouraging collusion with Viking enemies.

Legal Code: A formal collection of laws or decrees issued by a ruler or governing authority, intended to regulate behaviour within a defined jurisdiction.

The codes are not uniform in scope — some are lengthy, others brief — but together they form the most extensive legal record for any Anglo-Saxon king before the Norman Conquest.

Monetary Law

Aethelred’s legislation placed special emphasis on the regulation of coinage, a central feature of royal economic control.

Silver penny of Æthelred II (Helmet type), showing the royal bust and a cross reverse. Such coins were issued under royal authority and periodically renewed, reflecting the aims of monetary law noted in the syllabus. The specific moneyer/mint details shown here go beyond the syllabus but demonstrate accountability within the minting system. Source

The monetary law sought to ensure:

  • Regular recoinage to maintain currency quality and deter counterfeiting.

  • Royal monopoly over minting, with authorised mints operating in specified towns.

  • Standardisation of weights and measures, enhancing trust in trade.

  • Severe penalties for forgery, often including mutilation or death, to safeguard economic stability.

Monetary Law: Legislation that regulates the production, quality, and circulation of currency, ensuring economic stability and trust in financial transactions.

These measures were vital in a time of frequent payments to Vikings (the Danegeld) and in supporting the king’s broader fiscal demands.

The Role of the ‘Jury’

Aethelred’s codes also contain some of the earliest known references to the jury in Anglo-Saxon England. While not identical to the modern institution, the term referred to groups of local men sworn to investigate and declare facts in legal cases.

  • Composed of reputable local freemen, chosen to give sworn verdicts.

  • Functioned within shire and hundred courts, often alongside traditional oath-swearing procedures.

  • Aimed at reducing false accusations by relying on communal knowledge.

  • Strengthened royal justice by providing structured, community-based participation in law enforcement.

Jury (Anglo-Saxon context): A panel of local men sworn to give truthful verdicts in legal disputes or accusations, acting as a fact-finding body within royal courts.

The jury’s development under Aethelred reflected an ongoing trend towards more formalised and centralised justice systems.

Influence of the Church

Aethelred’s legislative agenda was heavily shaped by ecclesiastical leaders, especially Archbishop Wulfstan of York, whose moral and religious vision permeates the later codes. Laws frequently combined secular and religious sanctions:

  • Mandatory church attendance and observance of Christian festivals.

  • Moral regulation on marriage, sexual behaviour, and Sabbath observance.

  • Penalties for sacrilege and failure to pay church dues.

These measures aimed to unite the population under a shared moral and legal order, reinforcing both royal and ecclesiastical authority.

Law-Making Process and Enforcement

The promulgation of law under Aethelred followed established Anglo-Saxon practice:

  • Royal writs and public proclamation at great councils (witena gemōt).

  • Consultation with leading nobles and churchmen, ensuring broad support.

  • Regional assemblies (shire and hundred courts) tasked with implementing and enforcing legislation.

  • Local reeves responsible for collecting fines and organising trials.

Laws were often regionally adapted, acknowledging the differing customs of former Danelaw areas and West Saxon heartlands.

Purpose and Impact of Aethelred’s Laws

The legislation of Aethelred was an ambitious attempt to stabilise the realm amid constant Viking threat and internal factionalism. By codifying a wide range of issues — from defence obligations to moral conduct — Aethelred aimed to:

  • Reassert the king’s role as supreme judge and protector of the realm.

  • Integrate the Church into the machinery of governance.

  • Strengthen the economic base through control of coinage and trade.

  • Improve legal reliability via the use of juries and consistent procedures.

While the effectiveness of these laws was often undermined by military defeats and political instability, they represent a significant stage in the evolution of English legal tradition, bridging the gap between early Anglo-Saxon customary law and the more centralised systems of the post-Conquest era.

FAQ

Archbishop Wulfstan of York was a key adviser and likely the principal drafter of several of Aethelred’s later laws.

He integrated Christian moral teaching with secular legislation, ensuring that religious observance, social order, and royal authority were linked. Wulfstan’s style included repetitive, moralistic language intended to inspire reform and unity against external threats.

No — enforcement varied, particularly between former Danelaw areas and West Saxon territories.

Local customs in the Danelaw sometimes persisted alongside royal law, meaning implementation was adapted regionally. The shire and hundred courts acted as intermediaries, balancing central directives with local traditions.

The laws imposed severe punishments for treason, conspiracy, or aiding Viking forces.

Measures included confiscation of property, outlawry, and, in some cases, execution. These provisions sought to deter nobles and commoners from negotiating privately with the enemy.

Royal coinage carried the king’s portrait and name, acting as a visible assertion of sovereignty.

Standardised currency promoted economic stability, but it also served as a political statement — each new coinage reminded subjects of the monarch’s authority and legitimacy.

Earlier law relied heavily on oath-swearing and ordeal to prove innocence or guilt.

Under Aethelred, juries of sworn local men were tasked with fact-finding, creating a more communal and investigative approach. This reduced reliance on purely supernatural or ritual methods of judgement.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)
Identify two specific areas of governance covered by Aethelred II’s legislation.

Question 1 (2 marks)
Award 1 mark for each correct area identified, up to a maximum of 2 marks.
Acceptable answers include:

  • Regulation of coinage/monetary law

  • Defence obligations (e.g., against Viking raids)

  • Moral behaviour and religious observance

  • Use of juries in legal cases

  • Trade regulation and market fairness

  • Punishments for treason or conspiracy

Question 2 (5 marks)
Explain two ways in which Aethelred II’s monetary law supported royal authority.

Question 2 (5 marks)
Award up to 3 marks for explanation and up to 2 marks for accurate, relevant detail/examples.
Indicative content:

  • Royal monopoly over minting: By controlling all authorised mints, the king ensured that only approved currency circulated, reinforcing his authority (explanation – 1–2 marks; detail such as reference to specific mints or centralised control – 1 mark).

  • Regular recoinage and quality control: Periodic replacement of coins maintained trust in the currency and symbolised royal oversight, demonstrating the king’s economic power (explanation – 1–2 marks; detail such as penalties for forgery or standardised weights – 1 mark).
    Accept any other relevant explanation grounded in the content of the syllabus and study notes.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email