OCR Specification focus:
‘the impact of the French Revolution; radical threats; Whig splits 1790–1794.’
The early 1790s saw British politics destabilised by the French Revolution, radical agitation, and bitter divisions within the Whig Party, shaping government and opposition responses.
The French Revolution and its Impact on Britain
Early optimism and sympathy
At first, many Britons welcomed the French Revolution of 1789 as a hopeful break with absolutism. Reform-minded Whigs such as Charles James Fox praised the Revolution as a triumph of liberty over tyranny. The fall of the Bastille in July 1789 was interpreted by supporters as a parallel to Britain’s own Glorious Revolution of 1688, inspiring radicals to argue that Britain too required political and constitutional reform.
Growing alarm
However, as the Revolution radicalised — particularly after the execution of Louis XVI in 1793 and the emergence of the Reign of Terror — attitudes hardened.

An 18th-century engraving by Helman (after Monnet) shows the execution of Louis XVI at the Place de la Révolution on 21 January 1793. The guillotine, soldiers, and massed spectators convey the ritualised, state-sanctioned violence that alarmed British opinion. The French caption and architectural detail extend beyond the syllabus but aid orientation to time and place. Source
Conservatives such as Edmund Burke warned that Britain risked falling victim to similar violence if reform was pursued too far.

James Barry’s portrait of Edmund Burke presents the leading Whig critic of the French Revolution, whose Reflections (1790) shaped arguments for order and gradualism. The painting predates 1789 but accurately depicts the figure at the heart of the split with Fox. No extraneous detail beyond the sitter is included. Source
Edmund Burke: A prominent Whig politician whose 1790 work Reflections on the Revolution in France argued against radical change and defended Britain’s constitutional monarchy.
His ideas gained traction among the governing elite, strengthening the resolve to resist both French ideology and domestic reformist agitation.
Radical Threats in Britain
Growth of radical societies
Inspired by events in France, radical groups emerged across Britain, seeking to expand political rights and challenge the existing system:
London Corresponding Society (LCS), founded in 1792 by Thomas Hardy, campaigned for universal male suffrage and annual parliaments.
Society for Constitutional Information (SCI), re-energised by the Revolution, sought wider political reform.
Sheffield Society for Constitutional Information became a stronghold of radical working-class activism.
These organisations distributed pamphlets, held meetings, and built networks linking artisans, skilled workers, and intellectuals.
Government fears and public response
The radical movement alarmed the government of William Pitt the Younger, which feared parallels with the French Revolution. Pamphlets such as Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man sold in huge numbers, spreading radical democratic ideas across Britain.
Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man: A two-part political tract (1791–92) defending the French Revolution and advocating natural rights, republicanism, and political reform in Britain.
The popular appeal of such texts convinced Pitt that unchecked radicalism could destabilise Britain, particularly during war with revolutionary France.
Whig Splits 1790–1794
Foxite Whigs and pro-revolutionary sympathies
The Whig Party became deeply divided by differing responses to the Revolution. Fox and his supporters continued to support the Revolution well into the early 1790s, seeing it as part of a global struggle for liberty. They called for moderate reforms in Britain, including extension of the franchise and reduced corruption in Parliament.
Burke and the conservative Whigs
In contrast, Burke and his followers rejected the Revolution outright. Burke’s Reflections drew a line between constitutional stability and revolutionary anarchy. His warnings about violence and disorder resonated after events such as the execution of Louis XVI in January 1793.
This created a serious rift within the Whigs, weakening the party’s ability to function as a coherent opposition.
Portland Whigs and alliance with Pitt
A third faction, led by the Duke of Portland, moved closer to Pitt’s government. Alarmed by radical societies and unrest at home, they prioritised national security over party unity. In 1794, several prominent Whigs — including Portland, Windham, and Spencer — formally joined Pitt’s government, leaving Fox isolated with a much-diminished party.
Radical Threats and Security Concerns, 1792–1794
Government surveillance and prosecutions
Pitt responded to radical agitation by strengthening security measures:
In 1792, Royal Proclamation against seditious writings targeted Paine’s Rights of Man.
Radicals were placed under surveillance by Home Office spies and informers.
In 1794, leaders of the LCS and SCI were arrested and tried for treason, though juries acquitted them, demonstrating limits to government repression.
Popular loyalism
At the same time, many Britons rallied in defence of the monarchy and constitution. The Association for Preserving Liberty and Property against Republicans and Levellers, founded by John Reeves in 1792, mobilised public opinion against radicalism. Loyalist societies staged demonstrations, produced propaganda, and intimidated radicals, helping to check the spread of revolutionary sentiment.
War and radical decline
The outbreak of war with France in 1793 sharpened government anxieties. With Britain engaged in an existential struggle, radical societies were increasingly portrayed as subversive and unpatriotic. Harsh winters, food shortages, and economic hardship further heightened tensions, but government repression and loyalist counter-mobilisation weakened radical activity by 1794.
Whig Party after the Splits
Fox’s isolation
By 1794, Fox found himself leading a small group of committed radicals and reformists, largely excluded from power and isolated in Parliament. His speeches condemning the war and government repression won little support in the House of Commons.
Consolidation of Pitt’s dominance
Meanwhile, Pitt’s government was strengthened by the defection of moderate Whigs and by public support for firm action against radicalism. The Whig splits ensured the opposition could not mount a serious challenge, leaving Pitt dominant until his resignation in 1801.
FAQ
Thomas Paine was tried in absentia for seditious libel in 1792 after publishing Rights of Man, Part II. The trial resulted in his outlawing, with government efforts aiming to suppress the spread of his ideas.
Rather than destroying radicalism, the trial gave radicals a martyr-like figure. Pamphlets continued to circulate clandestinely, showing both the appeal of Paine’s message and the limits of state repression.
Loyalist associations like the Association for Preserving Liberty and Property mobilised public opinion against radicalism.
They produced propaganda portraying radicals as violent and unpatriotic.
Organised public demonstrations to show support for monarchy and constitution.
Disrupted radical meetings and intimidated activists.
This grassroots loyalism helped the government by reducing the radicals’ ability to gather mass support.
The execution symbolised the Revolution’s departure from moderate reform to violent republicanism.
For conservatives, it confirmed Burke’s warnings about chaos and the dangers of unchecked change. For moderates, it made supporting French reform untenable. The symbolism of regicide shocked many Britons, turning sympathy into fear and suspicion of radical ideas at home.
In 1794, key leaders of the London Corresponding Society and Society for Constitutional Information were arrested and charged with high treason.
Despite government hopes, juries acquitted them, reflecting public reluctance to equate political reform with treason.
The trials showed the government’s determination to intimidate radicals, but also the resilience of legal protections that made outright repression harder.
Fox was left with a small radical faction after moderates defected to Pitt.
His anti-war speeches received little parliamentary support.
Isolated from mainstream Whigs, his ability to influence legislation collapsed.
The split ensured Pitt faced no unified opposition, giving the government greater stability.
Fox’s diminished standing highlighted how the Revolution fractured Britain’s political landscape.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
In which year was the London Corresponding Society founded, and who was its founder?
Mark scheme:
1 mark for correctly identifying the year as 1792.
1 mark for correctly naming the founder as Thomas Hardy.
Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain two reasons why the French Revolution contributed to divisions within the Whig Party between 1790 and 1794.
Mark scheme:
Up to 3 marks for each well-explained reason, with detail.
Indicative content may include:
Foxite support for the Revolution: Fox admired the Revolution as a continuation of liberty, creating tension with more conservative Whigs. (1 mark for identifying, 2 marks for explanation with context).
Burke’s opposition in Reflections (1790): Burke argued the Revolution was dangerous and destructive, which clashed with Fox’s stance and deepened divisions. (1 mark for identifying, 2 marks for explanation with reference to impact).
Impact of revolutionary violence, e.g. execution of Louis XVI: Events convinced some Whigs to support Pitt’s conservative stance, further isolating Fox. (1 mark for identifying, 2 marks for explanation with consequence).
Maximum of 6 marks: candidates need two distinct, explained reasons.