TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

19.1.4 Powers Monarchs & Ferdinand’S Rule After Isabella’S Death

OCR Specification focus:
‘Powers of the monarchs; Ferdinand’s rule after Isabella’s death; the situation in 1516.’

The reign of Isabella and Ferdinand established a new model of monarchy in Spain, balancing traditions with reform. Their joint authority shaped governance, but Ferdinand’s solo rule after Isabella’s death in 1504 exposed tensions between Castile and Aragon, raising questions about unity and succession in 1516.

Powers of the Monarchs

Isabella of Castile and Ferdinand of Aragon are often described as embodying a “New Monarchy”, a style of rulership where the crown sought to centralise power and limit the independence of nobles, towns, and regional institutions. However, their powers rested not on absolute monarchy but on careful negotiation between traditions and reform.

Legal and Political Authority

  • Both monarchs were recognised as sovereign rulers of their respective crowns: Isabella in Castile and Ferdinand in Aragon.

  • Their marriage in 1469 created a dynastic union, but not a political fusion. Castile and Aragon retained separate institutions, laws, and administrative systems.

  • They ruled together under the title of the Catholic Monarchs, but each partner’s powers remained bound by their crown’s legal frameworks.

Dynastic Union: The marriage or inheritance-based unification of two crowns under one monarch, without merging their institutions or laws.

This arrangement meant that although they presented a united front internationally, their domestic powers were divided and exercised differently.

Royal Prerogatives

The monarchs strengthened their authority by:

  • Expanding use of the Crown Council to centralise decision-making.

  • Enhancing judicial authority through the Santa Hermandad (a royal police force in Castile).

  • Reasserting the right to appoint senior churchmen, boosting royal influence over religion.

  • Controlling the military orders (such as Santiago), ensuring loyalty to the crown.

Their powers were not absolute but marked a shift from feudal fragmentation towards stronger central authority.

Ferdinand’s Rule After Isabella’s Death (1504)

The death of Isabella in 1504 presented a major turning point. Ferdinand lost his joint authority in Castile, as its crown passed not to him but to Isabella’s daughter Joanna (“Juana la Loca”).

Crisis of Succession in Castile

  • By Castilian law, Joanna became queen of Castile.

  • However, her mental instability created uncertainty over her ability to rule.

  • Her husband, Philip of Burgundy (“Philip the Fair”), claimed authority through marriage.

This led to political instability:

  • Many Castilian nobles supported Philip, fearing Ferdinand’s dominance.

  • In 1506, Ferdinand was forced to step aside, allowing Philip to assume power as king consort.

  • When Philip died unexpectedly in the same year, Joanna’s incapacity left Castile effectively without stable leadership.

Ferdinand’s Return

  • To restore order, Ferdinand returned as regent of Castile on behalf of Joanna.

  • This period showed Ferdinand’s political resilience, but also his limitations—he was never fully accepted by the Castilian nobility.

  • His reliance on foreign advisers, particularly Italians, fuelled resentment in Castile.

Regent: An individual appointed to govern a kingdom temporarily when the rightful monarch is unable or unfit to rule.

Thus, while Ferdinand maintained authority, his position in Castile was fragile and contested.

The Situation in 1516

By 1516, Spain’s political landscape had shifted dramatically.

Ferdinand’s Later Rule

  • Ferdinand focused increasingly on Aragonese interests, including his Italian campaigns in Naples.

  • In Castile, power remained unstable due to Joanna’s confinement and the nobles’ divided loyalties.

  • Ferdinand sought to secure the succession for his grandson, Charles (later Charles I of Spain and Holy Roman Emperor Charles V), uniting both crowns under the Habsburg dynasty.

Issues Facing Spain

  • Fragmented unity: Castile and Aragon remained legally separate, with their own laws and institutions. The monarchs’ power rested on negotiation, not absolute control.

  • Succession tensions: Joanna was alive but confined, leaving questions over legitimacy. Charles’s inheritance would consolidate power but also bring new challenges.

  • International commitments: Ferdinand’s foreign policy, particularly in Italy, tied Spain into European conflicts.

Significance of 1516

When Ferdinand died in 1516:

  • The crowns of Castile and Aragon passed to Charles, creating the foundations of a more unified Spain under Habsburg rule.

Coat of arms of Charles I (1516–1518) combining the arms of Castile-León, Aragon–Sicily, and Granada. It symbolises the Habsburg succession in 1516 and the union of both crowns under one monarch. Source

  • However, the “union” remained fragile—Spain was not yet a centralised nation, but a composite monarchy.

  • The legacy of Isabella and Ferdinand lay in having strengthened monarchical authority, but within the limits of medieval institutions.

Key Points for Study

  • Isabella and Ferdinand’s powers were extensive but shaped by legal traditions and local privileges.

  • After Isabella’s death, Ferdinand’s authority in Castile was contested, revealing the limits of dynastic union.

  • By 1516, Spain faced a precarious succession and political future, setting the stage for Charles I’s reign.

FAQ

 Ferdinand was seen as an outsider in Castile, despite having co-ruled with Isabella. Castilian nobles resented his return after 1506, particularly because they feared Aragonese dominance. In contrast, in Aragon he was already the established ruler with traditional authority, so his legitimacy was uncontested there.

  • He returned as regent on behalf of Joanna.

  • He appointed trusted advisers, often Italians, to consolidate control.

  • He relied on existing royal institutions, such as the Council of Castile, to maintain order.

However, his use of foreign advisers deepened noble hostility, weakening his acceptance.

 Ferdinand arranged dynastic marriages to secure alliances and strengthen claims.

  • His daughter Joanna married Philip of Burgundy, linking Castile to the Habsburgs.

  • Their son Charles would inherit both Castile and Aragon.

This ensured Spain’s future under a single dynasty, though it also brought foreign influence into Iberian politics.

 Ferdinand focused heavily on the Kingdom of Naples, consolidating Aragonese influence there. This diverted attention from Castile and emphasised his Aragonese priorities. The Italian wars also tied Spain into European rivalries, shaping the international context in which Charles inherited power.

  • Castile and Aragon remained separate kingdoms with distinct laws and institutions.

  • Loyalty was more localised than national, with nobles retaining significant influence.

  • The union relied heavily on personal monarchy, meaning succession crises (like Joanna’s incapacity) could destabilise governance.

Thus, despite appearances of unity, the crowns were still functionally independent.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)

In which year did Ferdinand of Aragon become regent of Castile following the death of Philip the Fair, and who was the rightful monarch at that time?

Mark Scheme for Question 1

  • 1 mark for identifying the correct year: 1506.

  • 1 mark for identifying the rightful monarch: Joanna of Castile (Juana la Loca).

Question 2 (6 marks)

Explain two challenges faced by Ferdinand in ruling Castile after the death of Isabella in 1504.

Mark Scheme for Question 2

Award up to 3 marks per challenge, maximum 6 marks in total.

  • 1 mark for identifying a valid challenge.

  • 1 mark for providing accurate contextual detail.

  • 1 mark for explaining why this challenge undermined Ferdinand’s authority.

Examples may include:

  • Challenge 1: Joanna’s mental instability.

    • 1 mark: Identifying Joanna’s incapacity.

    • 1 mark: Explaining her position as queen made Ferdinand’s authority dependent on her.

    • 1 mark: Showing how this created uncertainty and encouraged noble resistance.

  • Challenge 2: Opposition from Castilian nobles.

    • 1 mark: Identifying noble resistance to Ferdinand’s control.

    • 1 mark: Explaining their support for Philip of Burgundy.

    • 1 mark: Showing how this weakened Ferdinand’s acceptance as ruler of Castile.

  • Challenge 3 (alternative acceptable): Resentment of foreign advisers (particularly Italians).

    • 1 mark: Identifying his use of foreign advisers.

    • 1 mark: Explaining nobles’ resentment of outsiders in governance.

    • 1 mark: Showing how this diminished Ferdinand’s legitimacy in Castile.

(Any two well-explained challenges gain full credit. Answers need not be in this exact wording but must show accurate knowledge and analysis.)

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email