OCR Specification focus:
‘divisions between north and south, the Pacification of Ghent (1576), the Unions of Utrecht and Arras (1579); effects of the assassination of William of Orange (1584); economic and strategic position.’
Introduction
The revolt in the Netherlands against Philip II revealed deep political, religious, and regional divisions. Key turning points included shifting alliances, assassinations, and the development of lasting north-south separation.
Regional and Political Divisions in the Netherlands
The Netherlands comprised seventeen provinces, each with distinct traditions, privileges, and political structures.
The north was more commercially dynamic, influenced by trade networks with the North Sea and Protestant ideas.
The south contained wealthier, traditional cities tied to Catholicism and Spanish interests.
These differences intensified during the revolt against Philip II.
The north leaned towards independence and Protestant reform.
The south often sought compromise with Spain to protect stability and Catholic orthodoxy.
The Pacification of Ghent (1576)
The Pacification of Ghent represented an extraordinary, but fragile, moment of unity. It was signed after the mutiny of unpaid Spanish troops, known as the Spanish Fury, culminating in the sack of Antwerp.

Netherlandish allegorical print of 1577 representing the Pacification of Ghent, reflecting hopes for unity across the Seventeen Provinces. It complements the notes’ focus on the Pacification’s aims and symbolism. Source
Key provisions included:
Expulsion of foreign troops from the Netherlands.
Restoration of provincial liberties and privileges.
Religious toleration between Catholics and Protestants, a significant concession at the time.
Although the Pacification offered hope for a united Netherlands, ideological and religious tensions made its survival difficult.
Pacification of Ghent: A treaty of 1576 in which all seventeen provinces of the Netherlands agreed to join forces to drive out Spanish troops and restore liberties.
The agreement faltered because Philip II refused to accept its terms, while differences between Catholic and Protestant provinces resurfaced quickly.
The Unions of Utrecht and Arras (1579)
By 1579, the fragile unity of the Pacification broke apart into two rival blocs:
Union of Utrecht (January 1579):
Formed by the northern provinces (Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht, Gelderland, and later others).Strongly Protestant in character.
Asserted independence from Spanish control.
Created the institutional basis for what became the Dutch Republic.
Union of Arras (May 1579):
Formed by the southern provinces (notably Artois and Hainaut).Predominantly Catholic.
Reconciled with Philip II and reaffirmed loyalty to Spain.
Secured guarantees of local privileges while remaining under Spanish authority.
This division crystallised the north-south split which would define the Netherlands for centuries.
Union of Utrecht: Alliance of northern provinces in 1579, laying the groundwork for the independent Dutch Republic, with a Protestant and anti-Spanish orientation.
The division was both religious (Protestant north vs Catholic south) and political (republican independence vs loyalty to monarchy).
The Assassination of William of Orange (1584)
William of Orange, also known as William the Silent, had been the central political and military leader of the revolt. His assassination in 1584 was a dramatic turning point.
He was killed by Balthasar Gérard, a Catholic zealot, in Delft.

Close view of the bullet holes in the wall of the Prinsenhof, Delft, left by the 10 July 1584 assassination of William the Silent. The photograph anchors the political narrative in tangible, site-specific evidence. Source
Philip II had earlier placed a bounty on William’s head, branding him a traitor.
His death deprived the rebels of their most experienced and charismatic leader.
However, rather than collapse, the northern provinces rallied. William’s son, Maurice of Nassau, rose to leadership, reorganising the military and continuing the resistance.
William of Orange: Nobleman and leader of the Dutch Revolt against Philip II, who sought religious tolerance and political independence for the Netherlands until his assassination in 1584.
The assassination reinforced the martyrdom image of William among Protestants, galvanising their determination to resist Spanish domination.
Economic and Strategic Position of the Netherlands
The economic and strategic situation of the Netherlands in the late sixteenth century was shaped by geography, commerce, and warfare.
Economic Factors
Northern provinces:
Strong maritime tradition with ports such as Amsterdam and Rotterdam.
Trade with England, the Baltic, and northern Europe flourished.
Emerging dominance in shipping and commerce, especially after Antwerp’s decline.
Southern provinces:
Wealthy cities such as Antwerp and Bruges relied heavily on international trade.
The Sack of Antwerp (1576) and subsequent Spanish control disrupted their economic dominance.
Many merchants migrated north, accelerating Amsterdam’s rise.
Strategic Factors
The north possessed a defensive advantage due to geography. Marshes, rivers, and dykes made Spanish advances difficult. Flooding land was an effective defensive measure.
The south, more open and accessible, was easier for Spanish forces to reoccupy.
This meant that while the north consolidated independence, the south gradually returned to Spanish rule, reinforcing the long-term division of the Netherlands.
Lasting Impact of the Divisions
By 1598, the Netherlands was irreversibly divided:
The north became a resilient Protestant republic with growing international influence.
The south remained Catholic, loyal to Spain, and economically weakened.
The divisions between north and south, shaped by the Pacification of Ghent, the Unions of Utrecht and Arras, and the assassination of William of Orange, ensured that unity could never be restored.
FAQ
The northern provinces’ geography provided natural defences against Spanish armies. Marshes, rivers, and dykes allowed rebels to control access and even deliberately flood land to halt enemy advances.
This made it harder for Spain to impose authority and gave the Union of Utrecht both time and security to consolidate.
Many Protestant states in Europe saw the assassination as evidence of Philip II’s ruthlessness, especially since he had placed a bounty on William’s head.
This strengthened sympathy for the Dutch cause abroad and encouraged England and France to consider support for the rebels as part of their own anti-Spanish policies.
Southern provinces had strong Catholic identities and feared Protestant dominance within the revolt.
They also wished to preserve local privileges and believed negotiation with Philip II would secure autonomy more reliably than continued warfare.
The Sack of Antwerp (1576) by mutinous Spanish troops created horror across the provinces, briefly uniting them in the Pacification of Ghent.
However, the economic devastation weakened Antwerp’s role as a commercial hub, prompting merchants to migrate north, deepening the north–south economic divide.
The Pacification became a symbol of unity and resistance in Dutch memory, showing that all seventeen provinces could briefly stand together.
Even after its collapse, later rebels invoked its legacy to argue for continued resistance to Spain and to legitimise calls for liberty and local rights.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks):
Name the two treaties of 1579 that formalised the division of the Netherlands into north and south.
Mark Scheme:
1 mark for correctly identifying the Union of Utrecht.
1 mark for correctly identifying the Union of Arras.
(Total: 2 marks)
Question 2 (6 marks):
Explain two reasons why the Pacification of Ghent (1576) was difficult to maintain.
Mark Scheme:
Up to 3 marks for each explanation.
Answers may include:
Religious divisions: Catholics and Protestants disagreed on toleration, leading to tension and breakdown. (1 mark for identifying, 2 marks for explaining how it caused instability, 3 marks for fully developed explanation with detail).
Spanish opposition: Philip II refused to accept the Pacification, ordering his governors and generals to undermine it. (1–3 marks depending on depth of explanation).
Provincial interests: Provinces valued local liberties and privileges differently, making unity fragile. (1–3 marks depending on development).
Maximum 6 marks: 2 well-explained reasons or 3 partial explanations.