TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

33.4.1 Aims Foreign Policy & Corfu Incident

OCR Specification focus:
‘Aims of foreign policy; Corfu incident; Locarno and Kellogg-Briand Pact.’

Introduction
Mussolini’s early foreign policy aimed to restore Italy’s prestige, expand influence in the Mediterranean and Balkans, and project Fascist strength through bold diplomatic and military actions.

Aims of Mussolini’s Foreign Policy (1922–1923)

Mussolini assumed power in October 1922, determined to assert Italy as a great power. His early foreign policy was shaped by several overarching goals:

  • Enhance National Prestige: Italy had emerged from the First World War as a ‘victor’ but with the perception of a ‘Mutilated Victory’, leading to widespread resentment.

  • Revise Post-War Settlements: The Treaty of London (1915) promised territorial gains that Italy felt were only partially delivered. Mussolini aimed to revise these agreements.

  • Expand Italian Influence: The Mediterranean was seen as ‘Mare Nostrum’ (‘Our Sea’), and Mussolini aimed to dominate the Adriatic, Mediterranean, and Balkan regions.

  • Strengthen Fascism Domestically: Foreign policy successes were vital to consolidate Mussolini’s regime and strengthen his image as a dynamic leader.

Mussolini’s early diplomacy was opportunistic, balancing aggressive rhetoric with limited resources. Italy was militarily and economically weak after the war, forcing Mussolini to rely on bluff, propaganda, and high-profile gestures rather than large-scale conflict.

Key Objectives Explained

Revision of Treaties

Mussolini sought to revise the Versailles system to gain more influence. Italy wanted:

  • Control over Dalmatian islands and parts of Dalmacija (denied after WWI).

  • Stronger position in the Dodecanese Islands and Albania.

  • Security in South Tyrol and Istrian Peninsula, previously annexed but contested.

Benito Mussolini's Rise to Power in Fascist Italy

Map of “Italia Irredenta” highlighting regions such as Corfu claimed by Fascist Italy to illustrate Mussolini’s revisionist aims. Source

Prestige and Power Projection

Italy’s sense of inferiority compared to France and Britain pushed Mussolini to adopt assertive measures. By orchestrating diplomatic stunts and minor military actions, Mussolini presented Italy as a bold and modern power on the international stage.

The Corfu Incident (1923)

The Corfu Incident was Mussolini’s first major foreign policy test and an early demonstration of his expansionist ambitions.

Background

  • In August 1923, an Italian general, Enrico Tellini, was assassinated while leading a boundary commission on the Greek-Albanian border.

  • Mussolini accused Greece of responsibility, demanding an apology and 50 million lire in compensation.

  • When Greece refused, Mussolini bombarded and occupied the Greek island of Corfu on 31 August 1923.

Actions Taken

  • Military Demonstration: Italian naval forces attacked Corfu, killing civilians and occupying the island.

  • Diplomatic Pressure: Mussolini refused to accept the League of Nations’ authority, insisting that the dispute be settled through the Conference of Ambassadors, dominated by major powers.

Outcome

  • Under pressure from Britain and France, Greece paid the demanded compensation.

  • Italian forces withdrew from Corfu in September 1923 after receiving the payment and a face-saving diplomatic solution.

  • Mussolini portrayed the event as a triumph, enhancing his image at home as a leader who could defy the League of Nations and assert Italian dominance.

Corfu Incident: A 1923 diplomatic and military crisis in which Italy occupied the Greek island of Corfu after the assassination of an Italian general, demanding compensation and apology..

Significance of the Corfu Incident

The Corfu affair highlighted several themes of Mussolini’s foreign policy:

  • Defiance of International Norms: Mussolini rejected League of Nations intervention, undermining its authority.

  • Use of Force and Diplomacy: He relied on military pressure combined with diplomatic manoeuvring to achieve results.

  • Domestic Propaganda Victory: The incident was widely publicised in Italy as proof of Fascist strength.

However, it also revealed Italy’s limitations. Mussolini had to compromise under British and French pressure, indicating that Italy lacked the power to sustain major conflicts.

Connection to Broader Foreign Policy Aims

The Corfu Incident was not an isolated event but part of Mussolini’s strategy to:

  • Assert Italy’s right to leadership in the Mediterranean.

  • Demonstrate that Italy could no longer be ignored in European affairs.

  • Lay the groundwork for future expansion in the Balkans and North Africa.

It also demonstrated Mussolini’s pragmatism: while willing to use force for prestige, he avoided war when confronted by stronger powers.

Following Corfu, Mussolini continued to seek prestige through diplomacy, leading to Italy’s participation in:

  • Locarno Treaties (1925): Agreements that normalised relations between European powers, increasing Mussolini’s international status.

  • Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928): A declaration renouncing war as a means of national policy, which Mussolini signed despite its contradiction with Fascist militarism.

Mutilated Victory: An Italian term describing dissatisfaction with the post-World War I peace settlements, which Italians believed failed to deliver promised territorial rewards.

By leveraging aggressive gestures like Corfu and participating in international agreements, Mussolini crafted an image of Italy as a resurgent power—a central pillar of his early foreign policy.

FAQ

Corfu lies at the entrance to the Adriatic Sea, giving control over key shipping routes and access to the Balkans.

Its location made it a stepping stone for Italian influence in Greece and the eastern Mediterranean. Mussolini viewed Corfu as part of Italy’s claim to dominate the region as ‘Mare Nostrum’.

 General Tellini was leading a League of Nations boundary commission between Greece and Albania. His murder provided Mussolini with a pretext to assert Italy’s power.

Instead of relying on legal or diplomatic measures, Mussolini blamed Greece outright, issuing an ultimatum that Greece refused. This refusal triggered Italy’s military response.

 Initially, Greece appealed to the League of Nations for help. However, Mussolini rejected its authority, undermining the League’s credibility.

The final settlement was made by the Conference of Ambassadors, which reflected Great Power dominance. This episode exposed the League’s weakness against aggressive states.

 Both countries were concerned about regional stability and feared escalation into a wider conflict.

  • Britain prioritised naval control in the Mediterranean.

  • France aimed to maintain its alliances in the Balkans.

Their diplomatic pressure showed Italy could not defy major powers without consequences.

 Despite concessions abroad, Mussolini presented Corfu as a Fascist triumph through propaganda.

He portrayed himself as a leader who defended national honour and forced Greece to pay compensation.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)
In which year did the Corfu Incident occur, and which country did Italy occupy during this event?

Question 1 (2 marks)

  • 1 mark for correctly identifying the year: 1923.

  • 1 mark for correctly identifying the country occupied: Greece (specifically the island of Corfu).

Full marks require both parts to be correct.

Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain two ways in which the Corfu Incident (1923) demonstrated Mussolini’s approach to foreign policy.

Question 2 (6 marks)
Award up to 3 marks for each explanation (maximum 6 marks):

Indicative content:

  • Use of force to achieve diplomatic aims: Mussolini ordered the bombardment and occupation of Corfu after the assassination of General Tellini, showing willingness to use military aggression.
    (Up to 3 marks: 1 mark for identification, 1 mark for description, 1 mark for explanation of significance.)

  • Defiance of international norms: Mussolini rejected the League of Nations’ involvement and insisted the dispute be resolved by the Conference of Ambassadors, reflecting his desire to bypass collective security and rely on Great Power diplomacy.
    (Up to 3 marks: 1 mark for identification, 1 mark for description, 1 mark for explanation of significance.)

Alternative valid points could include:

  • The use of propaganda to present the outcome as an Italian triumph.

  • Pragmatism when facing stronger powers by withdrawing after securing compensation.

Level descriptors for Question 2:

  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Clear, developed explanations of two ways with analysis of how these reflect Mussolini’s approach.

  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Some explanation given, but limited detail or lacks clear linkage to approach.

  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Basic statements with little or no development.

  • 0 marks: No relevant material.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email