TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

44.7.2 Elizabeth’s Preparations and Naval Leadership

OCR Specification focus:
‘Elizabeth’s preparations, leadership of the English navy, ships, supplies and morale before engagement.’

Elizabeth I’s preparations before the Spanish Armada of 1588 demonstrate her careful balance of diplomacy, strategy, and naval organisation, supported by pragmatic leadership and morale-boosting measures.

Elizabeth’s Strategic Preparations

Defensive Readiness

Elizabeth’s government recognised the seriousness of the Spanish threat long before the Armada’s final assembly. Preparations included:

  • Strengthening coastal fortifications along vulnerable regions such as the south coast and the Thames estuary.

  • Mobilising the militia and trained bands for land defence.

  • Implementing a system of beacons for rapid communication in case of invasion.

“Elizabeth’s government refurbished beacon chains and local musters to ensure rapid warning and mobilisation along the south coast and up-country.”

The beehive-shaped beacon watcher’s hut at Culmstock, part of the Elizabethan chain used to relay invasion warnings in 1588. Such sites coordinated signal fires, enabling swift musters and movement of men. The photo shows the surviving stone shelter used by lookouts. Source

Naval Readiness

England’s naval strength lay not in numbers, but in preparation and adaptability.

  • The Royal Navy was prepared with long-range artillery and smaller, more manoeuvrable ships.

  • Ports like Plymouth and Dover were readied for rapid deployment of fleets.

  • Elizabeth relied heavily on privateers, such as Sir Francis Drake, whose earlier raids weakened Spain and disrupted supplies.

Privateer: A privately owned ship licensed by the crown to attack enemy vessels and seize their cargo in times of war.

By sanctioning privateering, Elizabeth ensured a cost-effective expansion of naval capacity while maintaining royal control.

Leadership of the English Navy

Command Structure

Elizabeth placed command in the hands of experienced naval leaders:

  • Lord Charles Howard of Effingham served as Lord High Admiral, providing overall strategic leadership.

  • Sir Francis Drake, second in command, brought boldness and expertise from years of privateering.

  • Sir John Hawkins modernised naval administration and introduced reforms to improve ship design and supply systems.

This combination blended aristocratic leadership with practical maritime experience, ensuring both political reliability and operational effectiveness.

Naval Innovations

Hawkins was instrumental in introducing new ship designs:

  • The race-built galleon, a sleeker, lower vessel with greater manoeuvrability, gave England tactical advantages.

  • Standardised weaponry and improved gunnery drills ensured more effective broadside fire.

“English race-built galleons with reduced superstructures improved manoeuvrability and sustained broadside gunnery, matching Elizabeth’s preference for stand-off engagement.”

Full-hull model of an English galleon c.1588, showing the lowered superstructure and rig associated with the race-built design. These features reduced windage, eased handling, and supported gunnery-first tactics used against the Armada. The page also notes how such hulls helped avoid Spanish boarding tactics—directly relevant to pre-engagement planning. Source

These innovations highlighted Elizabeth’s willingness to embrace continuity and change in naval methods, adapting existing traditions to the needs of modern warfare.

Ships, Supplies, and Logistics

Fleet Composition

The English fleet numbered around 200 vessels, though many were smaller support craft. Crucially, the professional Royal Navy was supplemented by privately owned ships.

Supplies and Provisions

Supplying fleets for extended campaigns was a major challenge:

  • Food and water shortages were persistent due to poor preservation methods.

  • Hawkins introduced reforms to improve the quality of provisions, but supply remained precarious.

  • Financial constraints limited Elizabeth’s ability to sustain her navy indefinitely, forcing reliance on speed and decisive action.

Logistics: The organisation and coordination of resources, such as food, weapons, and transport, to sustain armies or navies during military campaigns.

Effective logistics determined not only fighting capability but also the morale of sailors.

Financial Pressures

Maintaining a fleet placed strain on royal finances:

  • Elizabeth attempted to minimise costs by using private enterprise and relying on towns to fund ships.

  • Naval pay often ran in arrears, reflecting the chronic underfunding of Tudor military expenditure.

Despite these weaknesses, resourcefulness compensated for financial limitations.

Morale and National Spirit

Elizabeth’s Role in Morale

Elizabeth’s leadership extended beyond strategic oversight to morale building:

  • Her famous speech at Tilbury in 1588 exemplified her ability to inspire troops, though this occurred after the Armada crisis had begun.

  • Earlier, she used propaganda and public appearances to reinforce confidence in divine favour and national unity.

Religious and National Motivation

The Armada campaign was framed as a conflict between Protestant England and Catholic Spain:

  • Propagandists portrayed Spain as a threat to religious freedom and sovereignty.

  • This alignment between religion and politics gave sailors and soldiers a powerful ideological incentive.

Crew Morale

Sailors faced harsh conditions, but the navy was buoyed by:

  • The reputation of Drake and Hawkins, whose leadership inspired confidence.

  • A widespread sense of defending England’s independence against a mighty Catholic power.

Even in the face of shortages, morale was sustained by national pride and the expectation of glory and profit from victory.

Assessment of Preparations

Elizabeth’s preparations reveal both strengths and weaknesses:

  • Strengths lay in innovative ship design, experienced leadership, and the mobilisation of national resources.

  • Weaknesses centred on financial limitations, unreliable supply chains, and dependence on private contributions.

“Howard’s fleet assembled at Plymouth, shadowed the Armada up-Channel, and coordinated with Dover and the Narrow Seas to maintain the initiative.”

Augustine Ryther/Robert Adams chart (1590) tracing the Spanish Armada’s route with compass roses, wind directions, and royal arms. Use it to orient English bases, patrol arcs, and sea lanes underpinning Elizabeth’s pre-engagement planning. The sheet is hand-coloured and clearly labels coastlines and movement—some elements exceed the syllabus by showing later stages of the campaign. Source

Nevertheless, Elizabeth’s pragmatic leadership and ability to inspire confidence ensured that England faced the Armada with resilience and readiness, despite its relative weakness compared to Spain.

FAQ

Elizabeth sought to limit expenditure by relying heavily on private enterprise. Wealthy merchants and towns were encouraged to fund and equip ships, effectively supplementing the Royal Navy at reduced royal cost.

She also sanctioned privateering, which allowed ships to raid Spanish vessels, generating revenue and resources without direct Crown funding. While effective, this meant preparations always carried financial risks, as funds and supplies were never entirely secure.

Hawkins restructured naval administration and standardised shipbuilding, ensuring vessels were both modern and effective.

Key reforms included:

  • Introduction of race-built galleons for manoeuvrability and firepower.

  • Better organisation of naval stores and supplies.

  • Attempted improvements in the quality of provisions, such as food and drink for sailors.

His reforms meant that when the Armada came, the navy was better structured and more efficient than in previous decades.

Conditions for sailors were harsh, with delayed pay and unreliable rations. Morale, therefore, was essential to keep men loyal and ready to fight.

Elizabeth used public appearances, propaganda, and promises of divine favour to inspire confidence.

Commanders like Drake also played a vital role in maintaining morale, as their reputations and daring exploits reassured sailors of their chances against Spain.

Plymouth was central to England’s naval defence because of its deep harbour and position on the south-west coast.

From here, English ships could:

  • Shadow the Armada as it sailed up-Channel.

  • Launch quick deployments into the Atlantic to intercept Spanish movements.

  • Maintain logistical support for the fleet before major encounters.

Its location gave England a crucial starting advantage against Spain’s larger but less flexible fleet.

Elizabeth’s leadership was not only strategic but symbolic. By visibly supporting her commanders and showing herself as a determined monarch, she reinforced national unity.

She projected the image of a ruler chosen by God, which encouraged the idea that England’s cause was divinely protected.

This combination of symbolic leadership and practical delegation helped maintain both popular and military confidence before the Armada’s arrival.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)
Identify two measures Elizabeth I took to prepare for the Spanish Armada in 1588.

Mark scheme:

  • 1 mark for each valid measure, up to a maximum of 2 marks.
    Valid answers may include:

    • Strengthening of coastal fortifications

    • Use of beacons for rapid communication

    • Mobilisation of the militia/trained bands

    • Refurbishment and preparation of naval ports such as Plymouth and Dover

    • Reliance on privateers such as Sir Francis Drake

Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain how Elizabeth’s leadership of the navy contributed to England’s readiness before the Armada.

Mark scheme:
Level 1 (1–2 marks): General description with little detail. May mention Elizabeth’s leadership in vague terms or refer to preparations without linking to leadership.

  • Example: “Elizabeth was Queen so she prepared the navy.”

Level 2 (3–4 marks): Some explanation of leadership with limited detail or range. Answers will begin to show awareness of command figures and morale but may not fully connect to readiness.

  • Example: “Elizabeth put Lord Howard in charge and this helped organise the navy.”

Level 3 (5–6 marks): Clear and developed explanation of how Elizabeth’s leadership decisions improved naval readiness. Must include at least two specific points of detail (e.g., choice of commanders, propaganda, morale-boosting, reliance on privateers, reforms through Hawkins). Links between leadership and preparedness should be explicit.

  • Example: “Elizabeth appointed Lord Howard of Effingham as Lord High Admiral and relied on Drake and Hawkins for their experience, ensuring effective command structures. She also used propaganda and appearances to build morale, which made her sailors and commanders more confident when the Armada arrived.”

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email