AP Syllabus focus:
'Economic growth in the 1950s and 1960s drew migrant workers from southern Europe, Asia, and Africa to western and central Europe.'
After 1945, booming European economies needed more workers than their own populations could supply. Labor migration reshaped industry, cities, and daily life, making postwar prosperity closely tied to large-scale movement across borders.
Why Labor Migration Expanded
In the 1950s and 1960s, much of western and central Europe experienced rapid postwar economic growth. Reconstruction after World War II, factory expansion, rising consumer demand, and major building projects created more jobs than domestic labor markets could fill. Countries such as West Germany, France, Britain, Belgium, and Switzerland faced labor shortages in both industry and urban services.
Governments and employers treated foreign labor as a practical solution. They needed workers quickly, especially for difficult jobs that were dangerous, repetitive, or poorly paid. Migration was therefore not a minor side effect of recovery; it became one of the foundations of economic growth.
Several conditions increased demand for outside labor:
wartime population losses and disruption
rapid industrial expansion
low unemployment in receiving countries
rising expectations among native-born workers, who often avoided the hardest jobs
Main Regions of Origin
Southern Europe
A major stream of migrants came from southern Europe. Large numbers of Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese, Greeks, and Yugoslavs moved north and west in search of higher wages and more stable employment. Their home countries generally had fewer industrial opportunities and lower living standards than the booming economies of western and central Europe.
For many of these migrants, movement within Europe seemed manageable because the distances were shorter and employers were openly recruiting. Migration offered the possibility of saving money, supporting family members, and improving social status.
Asia and Africa
Workers also came from Asia and Africa. These migration routes were often shaped by older imperial ties, trade networks, or government policy. France drew many workers from North Africa, while Britain attracted migrants from parts of South Asia and other regions connected to the former empire.
This pattern is important because it shows that postwar European recovery depended not only on movement within Europe, but also on labor from outside Europe. Economic growth in Europe was linked to wider global connections.
Recruitment and State Policy
Many governments organized labor migration through formal recruitment systems.
States signed agreements, labor offices matched employers with workers, and transportation networks moved migrants to the places where labor was needed most.
Guest workers: Foreign laborers recruited to fill labor shortages, usually with the expectation that their stay would be temporary.
The idea of guest workers strongly influenced policy, especially in West Germany.

This map traces Turkish labor migration to western Europe and lists the bilateral recruitment agreements that facilitated worker recruitment (including West Germany in 1961). It helps connect the “guest worker” concept to the interstate agreements that structured postwar labor flows. Source
Officials often assumed migrants would work for a limited period and then return home. Because of that assumption, governments frequently focused more on recruitment than on long-term integration. Workers might be given contracts and job placements, but not full political inclusion or a clear path to permanent settlement.
Jobs Migrants Performed
Migrant workers were concentrated in sectors essential to postwar growth:
mining
steel production
automobile manufacturing
construction
transport
some domestic and low-wage urban service work
These jobs were often physically exhausting, dirty, or dangerous. Migrants helped fill the gap between rapid growth and the available native labor force. Their labor supported the industries that symbolized postwar recovery, including housing, infrastructure, manufacturing, and mass consumer production.
Living and Working Conditions
Although wages were often better than those available at home, migrant workers frequently lived under difficult conditions. Many were housed in crowded dormitories, barracks, or employer-owned accommodations near factories and construction sites.

This photograph shows Turkish guest workers living in modest communal quarters in Frankfurt am Main (January 1969). It illustrates the everyday realities of postwar labor migration: employer-proximate housing, crowding, and the social infrastructure that formed around migrant workforces. Source
Language barriers, social separation, and short-term contracts were common.
Even so, labor migration offered important opportunities:
better earnings than in many sending regions
access to urban employment
the chance to save money
greater economic security than many migrants had previously known
For many workers, migration involved both hardship and opportunity. It was demanding, but it could also open a path toward material improvement.
Effects on European Society
Postwar labor migration transformed western and central Europe. Economically, it helped sustain the economic boom of the 1950s and 1960s by providing labor at the exact moment it was most needed. Without migrant workers, many industries would have struggled to expand at the same speed.
Socially, migration made European cities more diverse. New communities formed around workplaces, neighborhoods, and kinship networks. What governments often imagined as temporary labor movement increasingly created more lasting communities over time.
Labor migration also challenged older assumptions that European nations were culturally uniform. The postwar decades helped shape a Europe that was more mobile, more urban, and more interconnected with regions beyond its borders.
Historical Significance
For AP European History, the key point is that economic growth created labor demand, and that this demand drew workers from southern Europe, Asia, and Africa into the expanding economies of western and central Europe. Postwar prosperity depended in part on migrant labor. These workers helped rebuild industry, expand cities, and power the everyday economy of postwar Europe.
FAQ
The 1961 West German-Turkish recruitment agreement became one of the best-known postwar labour arrangements in Europe.
It mattered because:
West Germany had enormous industrial labour needs
Turkey had a large population seeking work abroad
the flow grew into one of Europe’s most significant migrant communities
Over time, Turkish migration became a symbol of how “temporary” labour programmes could create lasting social and cultural change.
Selection was often highly organised rather than informal.
Typical steps included:
registration at labour offices
medical examinations
checks on age and physical fitness
matching workers to specific employers or sectors
issuing contracts and travel papers
This process shows that postwar labour migration was often planned by states and businesses, not simply driven by individual choice alone.
Early recruitment schemes often focused on men, especially for mining, steel, and heavy industry.
However, women were also important:
some migrated directly for textiles, domestic service, or light manufacturing
others arrived later through family-based migration
women played a major role in stabilising migrant communities
So, while official imagery often centred on male industrial workers, women were essential to the longer-term development of migrant life in Europe.
Trade union responses were mixed and varied by country.
Some union leaders feared that employers would use migrant workers to hold down wages. Others argued that the best protection was to organise migrant workers and demand:
equal pay
equal workplace protections
equal access to collective bargaining
Where unions supported equal treatment, they could reduce labour competition and strengthen worker solidarity across national lines.
Many migrants practised circular migration, moving repeatedly between home and host country.
This happened for several reasons:
short-term contracts
seasonal or changing labour demand
family responsibilities at home
a desire to save money and return
uncertainty about residence rights
As a result, migration was not always a one-way journey. For many workers, it was a repeated strategy for earning income while keeping ties to their place of origin.
Practice Questions
Identify one reason western and central European countries encouraged labor migration in the 1950s and 1960s, and identify one major region from which migrant workers came. (2 marks)
1 mark for identifying a valid reason, such as postwar economic growth, labor shortages, reconstruction, or industrial expansion.
1 mark for identifying a valid region of origin, such as southern Europe, Asia, or Africa.
Evaluate the extent to which economic growth explains postwar labor migration to western and central Europe in the 1950s and 1960s. (6 marks)
1 mark for a defensible thesis arguing that economic growth was the main cause, or that growth mattered most when combined with state recruitment policies.
1 mark for explaining postwar reconstruction and industrial expansion as causes of labor shortages.
1 mark for using specific evidence from receiving countries, such as West Germany, France, Britain, Belgium, or Switzerland.
1 mark for using specific evidence from sending regions, such as southern Europe, Asia, or Africa.
1 mark for explaining how governments or employers recruited workers through agreements or guest worker systems.
1 mark for complexity, such as noting that migration was expected to be temporary but often had longer-term social effects.
