OCR Specification focus:
‘the ‘liberation of Europe in the East and West’’
This section examines how the Allied forces advanced through Europe during the closing stages of the Second World War, shaping the political divisions that would define the early Cold War.
Background to Liberation
The concept of liberation in 1944–45 referred to the military campaigns that removed Nazi German control from occupied territories. However, the meaning of liberation differed sharply between the Western Allies—principally the United States, Britain, and France—and the Soviet Union.
The Military Context
By 1943, the Axis powers were retreating:
In the West, Allied forces landed in Italy (1943) and later in Normandy on D-Day, 6 June 1944.
In the East, the Red Army pushed westward after victories at Stalingrad (1943) and Kursk (1943).

A labelled map of Soviet advances from August 1943 to December 1944, indicating major thrusts toward Central and Eastern Europe. It helps students visualise how Soviet occupation followed military progress and fed into post-war political control. Source
These offensives not only defeated Germany but determined who would occupy liberated regions.
Liberation in the West
Western Allied Advance
The Western Allies aimed to restore democratic governments and rebuild free societies. Key stages included:
Operation Overlord (D-Day) and the liberation of France, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
Entry into Germany from the west by late 1944–45.
The liberation here emphasised:
Re-establishing pre-war governments or facilitating free elections.
Providing emergency relief and planning economic recovery, laying foundations for later initiatives like the Marshall Plan.
Political Intentions
Western leaders such as Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill sought a post-war Europe based on:
Self-determination—the principle that nations should choose their own governments.
Limiting Soviet influence, though early cooperation was necessary to defeat Germany.
Liberation in the East
Red Army Occupation
As the Red Army swept through Eastern Europe, Soviet aims differed markedly:
Stalin viewed these regions as a buffer zone to protect the USSR from future invasions.
Soviet troops occupied Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria, installing pro-Communist administrations.
Buffer Zone: A group of friendly or controlled states surrounding a powerful nation to provide strategic protection against potential aggressors.
Political Consequences
Instead of fostering independent democracies, the USSR:
Sponsored coalition governments initially, but gradually sidelined non-Communist parties.
Ensured key ministries—such as the interior and defence—were controlled by Communist officials.
This process, often termed Sovietisation, sowed the seeds of post-war confrontation.
Contrasting Visions of Liberation
The Western and Eastern approaches revealed deep ideological divides:
Capitalism and Liberal Democracy vs. Communism and One-Party Control.
The West emphasised free elections, while the USSR prioritised security and ideological alignment.
These opposing visions led to:
Rising suspicion during the war’s final months.
Disputes over agreements made at the Yalta Conference (February 1945), which promised free elections in Eastern Europe but were not honoured by Stalin.
Key Countries and Regional Impact
Poland
Liberated by the Red Army in 1944–45.
Stalin insisted on a government friendly to Moscow, marginalising the London-based Polish government-in-exile.
Sparked early diplomatic tension with Britain and the USA.
The Balkans
Yugoslavia saw the Communist Partisans under Tito take power, maintaining a degree of independence from Moscow despite Soviet assistance.
Greece, in contrast, became a battleground between Communist partisans and royalist forces, prompting British—and later American—support for the anti-Communist side.
Germany
As both Western Allies and the USSR advanced, the country was destined for division.

A clear, labelled map of the Allied occupation zones in Germany after 1945, with Berlin shown as a special multinational area. It links military liberation to political outcomes in Germany that shaped East–West relations. Source
Initial plans for joint administration eventually collapsed, leading to separate zones of occupation and later the creation of West and East Germany.
Significance for the Cold War
The liberation of Europe directly shaped the post-war order:
Soviet occupation laid the groundwork for the Eastern Bloc.
Western liberation fostered democratic governments that would join alliances such as NATO.
Bullet points highlighting key consequences:
Emergence of an iron curtain dividing Europe into capitalist West and Communist East.
Triggered early superpower tensions despite the continuing wartime alliance.
Set the stage for later conflicts over Germany, including the Berlin Blockade (1948–49).
Allied Diplomacy and Tensions
During the liberation process:
Churchill, Roosevelt, and later Truman attempted to balance cooperation with the USSR against growing concerns about Soviet intentions.
The percentages agreement (Churchill–Stalin, 1944) informally divided influence in Eastern Europe but proved contentious.
By the Potsdam Conference (July 1945), disagreements over Poland, reparations, and the occupation of Germany had become stark.
Legacy
The ‘liberation of Europe in the East and West’ was not merely a military campaign but the foundation of the Cold War itself. As Nazi Germany collapsed, the contrasting methods and goals of Soviet and Western forces ensured that peace would be followed by political confrontation, not lasting cooperation.
FAQ
Local resistance groups provided crucial intelligence, sabotaged German transport and communication lines, and assisted Allied troops after landings.
In France, the Maquis disrupted rail networks before and during D-Day. Similar groups in the Netherlands and Belgium helped guide Allied forces through occupied territory, limiting German counterattacks and easing liberation efforts.
The Red Army used large-scale, co-ordinated offensives such as Operation Bagration (June 1944), which destroyed Germany’s Army Group Centre.
Rapid armoured thrusts and the use of massed artillery meant Soviet forces reached Warsaw and the Balkans months ahead of Western expectations, allowing Moscow to establish control before Allied diplomacy could intervene.
Britain and the United States supported the London-based Polish government-in-exile, while Stalin backed the pro-Soviet Lublin Committee.
When the Red Army halted outside Warsaw during the 1944 uprising, Western leaders suspected Stalin of allowing the Germans to crush non-Communist forces, ensuring a Soviet-friendly regime after liberation.
Liberation revealed devastated infrastructure, famine risk, and millions of displaced people.
• In the West, the Allies faced shortages of housing and medical supplies.
• In the East, Soviet requisitioning and war damage caused severe food crises, especially in Poland and Romania.
• Displaced persons camps were established, but repatriation to Soviet-controlled territories often provoked fear among refugees.
Western media highlighted freedom and democratic restoration, portraying Allied troops as protectors of civil liberties.
Soviet propaganda emphasised the Red Army as liberators from fascism, while also depicting Western delay in opening the Second Front as evidence of capitalist indifference. These narratives reinforced ideological divisions that deepened after 1945.
Practice Questions
Question 1 – 2 marks
Identify two countries liberated by the Western Allies during 1944–45.
Mark Scheme
1 mark for each correctly identified country.
Accept any two of the following: France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, Denmark, Western Germany (or specific regions such as the Rhineland if clearly linked to Western Allied operations).
Do not award marks for Eastern European countries or those liberated primarily by the Soviet Union.
Question 2 – 5 marks
Explain how the contrasting approaches to the liberation of Europe by the Western Allies and the Soviet Union contributed to the early Cold War.
Mark Scheme
1–2 marks: Limited explanation with simple statements, e.g. “The USSR wanted security while the West wanted democracy,” without supporting detail.
3–4 marks: Clear explanation with specific supporting examples, such as reference to free elections promised at Yalta, Soviet buffer zone policies, or Western commitment to self-determination.
5 marks: Well-developed analysis showing how these contrasting aims led to mistrust and set the stage for post-war tensions, e.g. disputes over Poland, Sovietisation of Eastern Europe, and the differing outcomes of liberation in East and West.