OCR Specification focus:
‘the Rye House Plot; Tory power and Whig weakness 1681–1685; the Anglican Church in 1685’
The years 1681–1685 marked a decisive turning point in late Stuart politics, where royal authority reasserted itself, Whig opposition declined, and the Church became a crucial pillar of the political order. This period saw the collapse of Whig hopes after the Exclusion Crisis, the emergence of Tory ascendancy, and the dramatic failure of the Rye House Plot.
The Rye House Plot (1683)
The Rye House Plot was an alleged conspiracy in 1683 to assassinate Charles II and his brother James, Duke of York on their return from Newmarket races. The plan supposedly centred on ambushing the royal coach near Rye House in Hertfordshire.

Rye House gatehouse, Hoddesdon, the only standing remnant of the manor associated with the 1683 plot. Its position near the road made it a plausible ambush point in contemporary accounts. Image shows architectural details that survive from the period, aiding spatial understanding of the alleged conspiracy. Source
Although the assassination scheme may have been exaggerated, the uncovering of the plot provided the Crown with an opportunity to destroy what remained of organised Whig opposition.
Several prominent Whigs were implicated, including Lord Russell, Algernon Sidney, and the Earl of Essex.

Mezzotint portrait of William, Lord Russell (c.1683), after Godfrey Kneller. Russell’s arrest and execution became emblematic of Whig defeat in 1683. The oval bust format and formal wig reflect elite political culture in late Stuart England. Source
Trials were conducted with heavily biased judges and juries, leading to executions and imprisonments.
The Whig movement lost many of its leading figures, either through death, exile, or political marginalisation.
Rye House Plot: A supposed conspiracy in 1683 to assassinate Charles II and James, Duke of York, near Rye House, which was used to justify repression of Whigs.
The discovery of the plot enabled Charles II to portray the Whigs as dangerous subversives and conspirators, undermining their legitimacy.
Tory Power 1681–1685
After the Oxford Parliament of 1681 was dissolved, Charles II no longer faced parliamentary opposition and relied on alternative sources of revenue, including French subsidies, customs duties, and the prudent management of Crown lands. The Rye House Plot accelerated the Tory resurgence, consolidating royalist dominance.
Features of Tory dominance
Association with loyalty: The Tories were portrayed as the defenders of monarchy, order, and stability, in contrast to Whigs, now tainted with treason.
Control of boroughs: Through the quo warranto proceedings, many borough charters were revoked or remodelled to ensure loyalist dominance in elections and local government.
Royal propaganda emphasised the dangers of rebellion, promoting loyalty to the Crown as both a political and religious duty.
Tory strength rested not only on royal patronage but also on their ideological support for monarchy, episcopacy, and established order.
Whig Weakness 1681–1685
By the mid-1680s, the Whig party was fractured and demoralised. Their reputation had been severely damaged by the events of the Exclusion Crisis (1679–1681) and the association with conspiracy through the Rye House Plot.
Causes of Whig decline
Exile of leaders: Key figures such as the Duke of Monmouth fled abroad, depriving the movement of leadership.
Harsh punishments: Executions of Sidney and Russell provided grim warnings, deterring further open resistance.
Loss of popular support: With memories of the Civil War still strong, the public associated Whig radicalism with disorder.
Whig propaganda had also failed to sustain momentum, as their attempts to link monarchy with Catholic absolutism were undercut by Charles II’s careful management of his public image.
The Anglican Church in 1685
The Anglican Church emerged as a decisive stabilising force during this period, aligning itself closely with the monarchy and Tory politics.

A 1662 Book of Common Prayer, widely used across the Church of England in the later Stuart period. Its rites and uniformity underpinned clerical preaching on loyalty and order. The stained-glass setting is extra context beyond the syllabus focus. Source
Bishops preached sermons emphasising loyalty and passive obedience, reinforcing the belief that resistance to the monarch was sinful.
The Church promoted the doctrine of non-resistance, arguing that subjects must obey rulers, even if unjust.
Clergy played a key role in spreading loyalist propaganda, shaping public opinion in favour of the monarchy.
Passive Obedience: The doctrine that subjects must submit to the authority of their monarch regardless of personal opinion, as rebellion was viewed as sinful.
In 1685, on the death of Charles II, the Church’s support helped ensure the smooth accession of James II, despite his open Catholicism, demonstrating its political influence.
The Legacy of 1681–1685
This period saw the consolidation of royal authority, the eclipse of Whig opposition, and the emergence of a firm link between Tory politics and the Anglican establishment. The Rye House Plot acted as both a catalyst for repression and a justification for the restoration of order, while the Church underpinned loyalty and obedience. The balance of political power had decisively shifted, setting the stage for the succession crisis under James II.
FAQ
Rye House was strategically located on the road between London and Newmarket, where the king frequently travelled. Its narrow approach made it easy to block a carriage.
The fortified gatehouse provided an ideal hiding place for armed men and created a choke point. These geographical features made the site attractive to plotters who wanted a controlled, ambush-ready environment.
The plot allowed royalists to paint Whigs as conspirators and republicans.
Executions of leaders like Lord Russell and Sidney reinforced this negative image.
Surviving Whigs faced suspicion, exile, or silence in politics.
To the public, they seemed reckless and associated with treason rather than legitimate opposition.
Royalist pamphlets and sermons capitalised on fears of rebellion.
Whigs were portrayed as radical extremists threatening peace.
Charles II appeared as a stabilising monarch protecting the kingdom from conspiracies.
Visual propaganda, such as prints, also dramatised the supposed plots to deter sympathy for opposition.
It combined politics with religion, teaching that resistance to monarchs was sinful in God’s eyes.
The message was preached in parish churches weekly, reaching nearly all communities. For ordinary people, religious obligation reinforced obedience beyond mere fear of punishment.
The failure of the plot weakened arguments for excluding James, Duke of York.
With Whigs discredited, support for altering the succession collapsed.
Royalists emphasised hereditary right as essential for stability.
By 1685, James succeeded without serious challenge, showing how the plot closed off constitutional alternatives.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
In which year was the Rye House Plot uncovered, and which future monarch was one of its intended targets?
Mark scheme:
1 mark for correct year: 1683.
1 mark for naming James, Duke of York (later James II) as a target.
Question 2 (5 marks)
Explain two reasons why the Anglican Church strengthened royal and Tory power in the years 1681–1685.
Mark scheme:
Up to 2 marks for identifying each valid reason (max 2 reasons).
Up to 3 additional marks for explanation showing how the reason strengthened royal and Tory power.
Indicative content (any two of the following, developed):
The Church preached loyalty and passive obedience, teaching that resistance to the king was sinful (identification = 1, explanation of how this bolstered monarchy and Tories = +1–2).
Bishops and clergy used sermons and teachings to spread royalist propaganda, reinforcing public support for order and stability (identification = 1, explanation = +1–2).
The Book of Common Prayer and uniform services created national religious conformity, linking the established Church directly to the Crown’s authority (identification = 1, explanation = +1–2).
Maximum marks: 5.