OCR Specification focus:
‘James’ actions; defeat and departure of James II’
James II’s downfall between 1688 and 1689 was one of the most dramatic political reversals in English history, as decisive miscalculations led to his rapid loss of power.
James II’s Actions after 1685
Following his accession in 1685, James II pursued policies that steadily eroded support across the political and religious spectrum. He was determined to strengthen the monarchy and promote Catholic toleration. Yet his methods alienated both Parliament and the Anglican Church, institutions central to stability.
Catholic Promotion and the Army
James advanced Catholic officers within the army, directly contravening the Test Acts.
The use of dispensing power to override statutory law was perceived as illegal and tyrannical.
The birth of James’s Catholic heir in June 1688 transformed fears into panic, as the succession appeared destined to remain Catholic indefinitely.
The Role of the Bishops and the Church
In 1688, James ordered the Declaration of Indulgence to be read from every pulpit. The refusal of the Seven Bishops to comply, and their subsequent trial, highlighted the deep resistance of the Anglican clergy to royal interference.

Engraving of the Seven Bishops imprisoned in the Tower of London in 1688 after resisting James II’s religious policy. Their prosecution galvanised Anglican and lay opposition, isolating the Crown. The image represents a crucial prelude to James’s loss of political support. Source
Alienation of Political Groups
Tories, natural supporters of monarchy, were disillusioned by James’s disregard for law and the Church.
Whigs, long hostile to Catholicism and absolutism, saw their fears confirmed.
Even moderate figures who might have tolerated a Catholic monarch recoiled from James’s authoritarian style.
Dispensing Power: The royal authority claimed by James II to suspend or exempt individuals from the operation of parliamentary laws, especially religious tests.
This use of royal prerogative placed James directly in conflict with constitutional traditions.
The Crisis of 1688
The Birth of a Heir
The birth of James Francis Edward Stuart on 10 June 1688 alarmed Protestants. A permanent Catholic dynasty seemed unavoidable, threatening the Protestant succession previously assumed to fall to James’s daughters, Mary and Anne.
The Invitation to William
In response, seven leading political figures – later known as the Immortal Seven – secretly invited William of Orange, the Protestant husband of James’s daughter Mary, to intervene militarily.
William’s forces were welcomed as potential protectors of Protestant liberties.
The invitation exposed the collapse of James’s authority among elites.
The Desertion of Key Figures
As William landed at Torbay in November 1688, defections from James’s camp began.

A labelled map tracing William of Orange’s 1688 route from Brixham/Torbay to London, clarifying the geographical logic of his advance and James’s weakening position. The map also depicts the Monmouth Rebellion (1685) with dashed lines — additional detail beyond the syllabus focus but helpful for context. Source
Churchill (later Duke of Marlborough) and other officers deserted.
James’s daughter Anne also defected, undermining dynastic loyalty.
Regional gentry increasingly shifted allegiance to William.
James’s Defeat
Loss of Military Confidence
James initially planned to resist William’s advance with force. However, he soon discovered that his army, riddled with distrust and desertions, could not be relied upon.
Panic and disorder spread through the royal ranks.
The flight of leading officers crippled James’s military capacity.
Immortal Seven: The group of English nobles and bishops who invited William of Orange to invade in 1688, pledging support for a Protestant succession.
With both political and military backing collapsing, James was unable to mount a serious defence.
Attempted Negotiations
James vacillated between conciliation and firmness:
He offered concessions to the Church and Parliament but was no longer trusted.
By this stage, many elites viewed compromise as insufficient.
The Departure of James II
The First Flight Attempt
On 11 December 1688, James attempted to flee London and threw the Great Seal into the River Thames to prevent governmental continuity.

An engraved plate of the Great Seal of James II, the emblem of royal authority for authenticating state documents. Its loss during James’s flight signalled a break in legal-administrative continuity. This visual anchors the departure narrative to a concrete constitutional symbol. Source
The Second Departure
William advanced towards London with growing support. Realising his position was untenable, James fled again on 23 December 1688, this time successfully escaping to France.
He was received by Louis XIV, whose Catholic monarchy offered him refuge.
William avoided formally deposing James, allowing him to appear as though he had abdicated by deserting the throne.
The Convention Parliament’s Role
With James absent, a Convention Parliament was summoned in January 1689. Parliament declared that James, by fleeing and subverting the constitution, had effectively abdicated.
The throne was offered jointly to William III and Mary II, establishing a Protestant monarchy.
James’s departure therefore marked not just personal defeat but the end of Catholic absolutism in England.
Key Reasons for Collapse
James II’s rapid downfall was the result of several interlinked factors:
Religious alienation: Catholic promotion and the Declaration of Indulgence provoked universal Protestant opposition.
Political miscalculation: His reliance on prerogative powers undermined trust.
Dynastic fears: The birth of a Catholic heir made resistance urgent.
Military unreliability: Desertion and distrust crippled defence.
Loss of elite support: Both Whigs and Tories abandoned him.
The combined effect left James isolated, discredited, and ultimately incapable of retaining the throne. His actions, defeat, and departure in 1688–89 directly facilitated the Glorious Revolution, which reshaped the constitutional and religious framework of Britain.
FAQ
The Great Seal was the physical emblem of monarchical authority, used to validate laws and official documents. By destroying it, James hoped to prevent Parliament or William of Orange from governing in his absence.
However, the act backfired. Rather than halting political process, it was viewed as evidence of panic and irresponsibility, further undermining James’s legitimacy and authority.
His daughter Anne, a Protestant, defected to William’s side, which signalled a dynastic betrayal.
His wife, Mary of Modena, was the mother of the new Catholic heir, intensifying fears of a Catholic succession.
The contrasting loyalties of his children emphasised the division within the royal household, symbolising James’s isolation.
This split weakened his claim to broad dynastic loyalty, a key foundation of monarchical stability.
France played the most immediate role. Louis XIV offered James refuge after his escape, providing safety and resources in exile.
Foreign perception of James’s regime also mattered: William’s invasion succeeded partly because other European states were preoccupied with Louis XIV’s wars, leaving little opposition to William’s intervention in England.
Tories valued monarchy and the Church of England. James undermined both:
He appointed Catholics in defiance of parliamentary law.
He challenged Anglican dominance with the Declaration of Indulgence.
By alienating the Church, James eroded Tory loyalty. For many Tories, defending Protestantism became more important than preserving unconditional obedience to the king.
The army was James’s last resort for resistance. When senior officers like John Churchill defected, morale collapsed.
Desertions meant James could not rely on his forces to fight William.
Ordinary soldiers were unwilling to oppose a Protestant liberator.
This lack of dependable military strength forced James to abandon attempts at defence, hastening his departure.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
In which month and year did William of Orange land in England during the Glorious Revolution?
Mark scheme:
1 mark for correct month: November
1 mark for correct year: 1688
Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain two reasons why James II’s position collapsed so quickly in 1688.
Mark scheme:
Up to 3 marks for each well-explained reason.
Candidates should identify a reason (1 mark) and provide supporting explanation/development (up to 2 marks).
Indicative content:
Birth of a Catholic heir in June 1688, which created fear of a permanent Catholic dynasty (1 mark for identification, 1–2 marks for explanation of why this alarmed Protestants and political elites).
Widespread opposition to James’s use of the dispensing power and promotion of Catholics into positions of authority (1 mark for identification, 1–2 marks for explaining how this alienated both Whigs and Tories).
Defections of key political and military figures to William of Orange (1 mark for identification, 1–2 marks for explanation of how this undermined James’s capacity to resist militarily).
Maximum 6 marks: two fully explained reasons.