TutorChase logo
Login
AQA A-Level Business

2.2.2 Scientific Decision Making and Decision Trees

Scientific decision making helps managers make logical, evidence-based choices. One key tool used is the decision tree, which maps out options, probabilities, and outcomes to support business decisions.

What Is a Decision Tree?

A decision tree is a graphical and analytical tool that helps managers make decisions by mapping out different choices and their possible consequences. It is used within the broader framework of scientific decision making, where decisions are based on evidence, logical analysis, and calculated outcomes rather than gut feeling.

The decision tree is designed to lay out all possible options in a visual format, allowing decision makers to compare different strategies and assess the risks and benefits of each. It simplifies complex decisions by breaking them down into smaller parts and presenting them in a structured flow.

Structure of a Decision Tree

A well-constructed decision tree includes three main components:

  • Decision nodes (represented by a square): These indicate a point at which a business must choose between two or more alternatives. For example, a company deciding whether to enter a new market or stay in its current one would start with a decision node.

  • Chance nodes (represented by a circle): These represent the possible outcomes of a decision, along with the associated probabilities of each outcome occurring. They follow the decision nodes and reflect the uncertainty in business scenarios. For instance, after deciding to launch a product, the business might face the possibility of high sales or low sales.

  • Outcomes (written at the end of each branch): These represent the potential results of the various decisions and are usually expressed in monetary terms, such as profit, cost, or revenue. They are essential for calculating the expected value of each option.

The layout of a decision tree begins with a decision node that branches into options. Each option leads to a chance node with further branches showing the possible results and their probabilities. At the end of each outcome branch, the financial consequence is indicated.

Constructing a Decision Tree

To effectively use a decision tree, a business must follow a logical step-by-step process:

Step 1: Identify the Decision

Begin with a decision node, which outlines the specific choice that needs to be made. Clearly define all possible alternatives.

Example: A business is considering whether to develop Product A or Product B. This forms the decision node with two branches—Product A and Product B.

Step 2: Map Out the Possible Outcomes

From each decision option, draw branches leading to chance nodes. Identify the different outcomes that might occur as a result of the decision.

Example: After choosing Product A, possible outcomes could be:

  • High demand

  • Low demand

Each of these would become a branch from the chance node.

Step 3: Assign Probabilities to Outcomes

Each outcome must be assigned a probability, which is a numerical expression of how likely that outcome is. Probabilities must always lie between 0 and 1, and the total probability from any one chance node must equal exactly 1.

Example:

  • High demand: 0.7

  • Low demand: 0.3

Step 4: Add Financial Outcomes

At the end of each branch, include the expected monetary outcome for that particular result. These should be realistic estimates of profit or loss based on research, past performance, or forecasts.

Example:

  • High demand: profit of £60,000

  • Low demand: profit of £15,000

Step 5: Calculate Expected Value (EV)

Expected value is the weighted average of all possible outcomes for a decision, calculated using the following formula:

Expected value = (probability × monetary outcome) for each branch, summed together

Example for Product A:

  • High demand: 0.7 × £60,000 = £42,000

  • Low demand: 0.3 × £15,000 = £4,500

  • Total expected value = £42,000 + £4,500 = £46,500

Step 6: Calculate Net Gain

After working out the expected value, subtract the cost of the decision to find the net gain.

Net gain = expected value − cost of the decision

Example:

  • Cost to launch Product A: £20,000

  • Net gain = £46,500 − £20,000 = £26,500

This figure represents the total financial benefit expected after taking costs into account.

Interpreting a Decision Tree

Once the tree is complete and net gains for each option have been calculated, managers can evaluate the best course of action.

  • The option with the highest net gain is usually selected.

  • If two options have similar net gains, qualitative factors such as brand alignment or ethical concerns may be considered.

Worked Example:

A company is choosing between two projects:

Project A:

  • Cost: £20,000

  • High sales (probability 0.7): revenue £50,000

  • Low sales (probability 0.3): revenue £10,000

  • Expected value = (0.7 × £50,000) + (0.3 × £10,000) = £35,000 + £3,000 = £38,000

  • Net gain = £38,000 − £20,000 = £18,000

Project B:

  • Cost: £25,000

  • High sales (probability 0.6): revenue £60,000

  • Low sales (probability 0.4): revenue £5,000

  • Expected value = (0.6 × £60,000) + (0.4 × £5,000) = £36,000 + £2,000 = £38,000

  • Net gain = £38,000 − £25,000 = £13,000

Decision: Project A is preferable, as it has a higher net gain of £18,000.

Advantages of Using Decision Trees

Using decision trees has several benefits, particularly in a business environment where clarity and logical thinking are essential:

1. Visual Simplicity

  • Presents complex decisions in a visual and easy-to-follow format.

  • Helps break down decisions into manageable parts.

2. Supports Rational Thinking

  • Encourages decisions to be made on facts, figures, and logic, not emotion or guesswork.

  • Minimises personal bias.

3. Quantifies Risk and Reward

  • Assigning probabilities and outcomes enables businesses to evaluate risk-reward ratios for each option.

  • Supports risk-aware decision making.

4. Makes Comparison Easier

  • Allows managers to directly compare the net gains of multiple options.

  • Helps determine the most profitable or beneficial choice.

5. Encourages Transparency and Communication

  • Easy to share and explain with teams or stakeholders.

  • Demonstrates that a decision has been carefully considered.

6. Useful for Strategic Planning

  • Ideal for long-term or high-stakes decisions like product launches, market entry, or acquisitions.

Limitations of Decision Trees

Despite their strengths, decision trees are not without flaws. It is important to understand the potential downsides:

1. Relies on Accurate Estimates

  • Probabilities and monetary values may be guessed or estimated.

  • Inaccurate data leads to misleading results and poor decisions.

2. Oversimplifies Reality

  • Complex factors such as changing customer behaviour, competitor actions, or regulatory changes are not captured.

  • Human and ethical aspects of decisions are often ignored.

3. Time-Consuming to Construct

  • Building a tree requires thorough data collection and analysis.

  • May take significant time for large or complex decisions.

4. Probabilities May Be Subjective

  • In many cases, probabilities are not known with certainty and must be estimated based on judgement or past data.

  • This introduces uncertainty and potential bias.

5. Doesn’t Guarantee Success

  • Even the option with the highest expected value can still fail, because probabilities represent likelihood, not certainty.

  • Unexpected events can render a tree irrelevant.

6. Ignores Qualitative Factors

  • Decision trees do not factor in elements like:

    • Brand image

    • Ethical concerns

    • Employee motivation

  • These may be important for long-term success.

When Are Decision Trees Most Appropriate?

Decision trees are most useful in the following scenarios:

  • When outcomes can be predicted and data is available

  • For decisions with financial implications

  • When choices involve multiple possible outcomes

  • Where management must justify or present decisions to others

  • When comparing projects, investments, or strategies

Less suitable when:

  • The decision relies heavily on qualitative judgment

  • The environment is highly uncertain or rapidly changing

  • The business lacks reliable data on probabilities or financial outcomes

  • Ethical considerations or stakeholder expectations are key

Tips for AQA A-Level Business Students

  • Make sure each chance node’s probabilities add up to 1.

  • Always label decision and chance nodes clearly in your diagram.

  • Show all working when calculating EV and net gain—this is important in exams.

  • Use realistic business examples when asked to interpret or justify decision trees.

  • Practise interpreting trees with multiple branches and outcomes to prepare for longer exam questions.

  • Remember that decision trees do not make decisions, but they support a logical decision-making process.

Understanding decision trees helps you approach business decisions like a real manager—by weighing up evidence, thinking ahead, and making smart, reasoned choices.

FAQ

When reliable historical data is unavailable, managers often use informed estimates, industry benchmarks, or expert judgement to assign probabilities. They may consult market research, conduct pilot studies, or analyse competitor behaviour to form reasonable assumptions. Sensitivity analysis can also be used to test how different probability values affect the overall expected value. Although this method introduces uncertainty, using multiple sources and reviewing past decisions can improve the quality of the estimates and support better decision-making in the absence of hard data.

A decision tree is more effective when the outcomes are quantifiable and the decision involves multiple possible scenarios with varying levels of risk. Strategic decisions, such as expanding into a new market or investing in new technology, benefit from decision trees because they allow firms to compare complex options using expected value and net gain. Including detailed probabilities, thorough cost analysis, and realistic outcome values enhances the model’s usefulness, especially when combined with scenario planning and expert input.

While decision trees are most commonly used for financial decisions, they can also be adapted for non-financial ones. For example, when deciding on employee training programmes or choosing a sustainability initiative, outcomes can be measured in terms of qualitative benefits like employee satisfaction, customer loyalty, or environmental impact. In such cases, values may be represented as relative scores or rankings instead of monetary figures. However, the subjective nature of these decisions makes it harder to assign probabilities, so additional qualitative analysis is usually necessary.

Decision trees encourage an objective, structured approach by requiring managers to map out all options, outcomes, and probabilities explicitly. This reduces the influence of cognitive biases such as overconfidence or anchoring, as decisions are made based on calculated expected values rather than instinct or personal preference. By forcing a systematic evaluation of each possible path, decision trees promote rational thinking and transparency, making them especially useful in group decision-making environments where bias from dominant individuals could otherwise affect the final choice.

Businesses may revise decision trees when new information becomes available, such as updated market forecasts, competitor actions, or cost changes. Since business environments are dynamic, assumptions used in the original tree—such as probabilities or monetary outcomes—can become outdated. Revising the tree allows managers to maintain relevance and improve decision accuracy. Additionally, if a decision tree is used over a long time frame, regular updates help ensure it reflects current conditions, enhancing the quality of strategic planning and risk management.

Practice Questions

Explain one limitation of using decision trees in business decision making. (6 marks)

One key limitation of using decision trees is that they rely heavily on estimated probabilities and monetary values, which may not always be accurate. If the data used to build the decision tree is unreliable or outdated, the results can be misleading and lead to poor decision making. In dynamic or uncertain environments, outcomes may be influenced by factors not accounted for in the model. For example, consumer behaviour may change unexpectedly or competitors may respond unpredictably. As a result, businesses could base important decisions on flawed assumptions, potentially leading to financial losses or missed opportunities.

Analyse the benefits of using decision trees to decide whether to launch a new product. (9 marks)

Decision trees offer a structured way to assess the potential outcomes of launching a new product, helping managers quantify both risk and reward. By assigning probabilities to outcomes such as high or low demand, firms can calculate expected values and net gains, allowing them to make evidence-based decisions. This helps reduce uncertainty and supports rational planning. Decision trees are especially useful when financial data is available and decisions need to be justified to stakeholders. However, while they enhance objectivity, their effectiveness depends on the accuracy of inputs and should be complemented by qualitative analysis and market insight.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email