TutorChase logo
Login
AQA A-Level Business

6.3.2 Influences on Organisational Design

Organisational design refers to how a business structures roles, responsibilities, and relationships to achieve its goals effectively and efficiently.

Key Elements of Organisational Design

Organisational design affects how a company is structured, how it communicates internally, how efficiently it operates, and how responsive it can be to change. These elements are not isolated — they interact and influence overall organisational success.

Authority

Definition

Authority refers to the formal power assigned to individuals or roles within an organisation to make decisions, allocate resources, and direct the actions of others. It determines who has the right to give orders and who must follow them.

Purpose and Importance

  • Establishes clear decision-making responsibility.

  • Creates an accountability framework for actions taken.

  • Defines the chain of command, ensuring everyone knows to whom they report.

  • Facilitates order and control, reducing ambiguity within teams.

Types of Authority

  • Line authority: The right to give direct orders to subordinates. It flows vertically from top-level managers down through the hierarchy. For example, a sales manager instructing a sales assistant.

  • Staff authority: Exists in advisory roles. Staff members have expertise and recommend actions but do not issue direct orders. For instance, an HR advisor suggesting recruitment procedures.

Application in Business

Authority shapes:

  • Strategic planning (e.g. made by directors or executive boards).

  • Operational decisions (e.g. made by department heads).
    Day-to-day activities (e.g. carried out by team supervisors).

Impacts on Performance

  • Centralised authority often ensures consistency and control but may slow down responsiveness.

  • Delegated authority boosts speed and motivation, especially in dynamic sectors like tech or retail.

Span of Control

Definition

Span of control is the number of subordinates who report directly to a single manager. It determines how many people a manager supervises directly.

Types

  • Wide span of control: A manager oversees many employees.

  • Narrow span of control: A manager supervises a small number of people.

Factors Influencing Span of Control

  • Complexity of tasks: Complex or varied tasks often require more supervision (narrower span).

  • Experience and competence of employees: Skilled workers may need less oversight (wider span).

  • Use of technology: Digital tools (e.g. Slack, project management software) allow for wider spans through improved communication.

  • Geographical spread: If teams are spread across regions, a narrower span may be necessary.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Wide Span of Control
Advantages
:

  • Fewer layers of management → cost savings.

  • More autonomy for employees → higher morale.

  • Faster communication flow.

Disadvantages:

  • Risk of manager overload.

  • Less direct supervision → possible decline in quality control.

Narrow Span of Control
Advantages
:

  • Close supervision → better performance monitoring.

  • Strong relationships between manager and subordinates.

Disadvantages:

  • High management costs.

  • Risk of micromanagement.

  • Slower decision-making process due to more hierarchical levels.

Business Implications

  • Retail chains with similar stores often adopt wide spans for efficiency.

  • Specialist firms (e.g. legal or consulting firms) prefer narrow spans due to the complexity of tasks.

Hierarchy

Definition

Hierarchy is the vertical structure of an organisation, represented by levels of authority and responsibility. It reflects how many layers exist between the lowest employee and the top decision-makers.

Types of Hierarchy

  • Tall Hierarchy:

    • Many layers.

    • Clear progression and formal reporting lines.

    • Used in traditional, bureaucratic organisations.

  • Flat Hierarchy:

    • Fewer levels.

    • Encourages open communication and fast decision-making.

    • Common in start-ups and creative industries.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Tall Hierarchies
Advantages
:

  • Clear roles and responsibilities.

  • Strong control and oversight.

  • Specialised roles.

Disadvantages:

  • Slow communication across levels.

  • Employees feel less empowered.

  • Risk of duplication of effort or inefficiencies.

Flat Hierarchies
Advantages
:

  • Faster communication and decision-making.

  • Employees feel more empowered and involved.

  • Encourages innovation.

Disadvantages:

  • Ambiguity in roles.

  • Increased workload for managers.

  • Fewer promotion opportunities.

Practical Impacts

  • Fast-moving industries (e.g. tech firms) benefit from flat structures for innovation.

  • Large government departments often require tall structures to manage complexity.

Delegation

Definition

Delegation is the process by which managers assign responsibility and authority for tasks to subordinates, while retaining accountability for results.

Key Concepts

  • Responsibility: Being assigned a task.

  • Authority: Being granted the power to carry it out.

  • Accountability: Remaining answerable for outcomes.

Benefits of Delegation

  • Increases productivity by dividing work.

  • Empowers employees and builds skills.

  • Allows managers to focus on strategic issues.

  • Can boost motivation and job satisfaction.

Risks of Poor Delegation

  • Inadequate supervision may result in errors.

  • Delegated tasks without clear instructions can create confusion.

  • Reluctance to delegate due to lack of trust can reduce team morale.

Delegation in Action

A regional manager of a restaurant chain might delegate staff scheduling to local branch managers. If done well, this saves time and ensures decisions reflect local knowledge.

Centralisation vs Decentralisation

Definitions

  • Centralisation: All major decisions are made at the top levels of management. Authority is concentrated.

  • Decentralisation: Decision-making power is distributed throughout the organisation, closer to operational levels.

Comparison of Features

Centralisation

  • Strong control from headquarters.

  • Consistent policies and procedures.

  • Easier to enforce standards.

Decentralisation

  • Local managers make decisions.

  • Faster responses to local needs.

  • Encourages innovation.

Pros and Cons

Centralisation
Pros
:

  • Uniform customer experience.

  • Easier coordination and control.

  • Better during crises or when strong leadership is needed.

Cons:

  • Local branches may feel powerless.

  • Poor local adaptation (e.g. a global fashion brand misreading local tastes).

  • Slower response times.

Decentralisation
Pros
:

  • Empowers managers and employees.

  • Quick adaptation to customer needs.

  • Encourages entrepreneurial thinking.

Cons:

  • Risk of inconsistent service or messaging

  • Harder to ensure compliance.

  • May require high training costs for local decision-makers.

Examples

  • Centralised: McDonald's uses a centralised menu and branding to maintain consistency across countries.

  • Decentralised: Tesco empowers store managers to adjust stock and staffing based on local demand.

How Design Elements Affect Organisational Outcomes

Each component of organisational design plays a vital role in shaping how a business functions. The balance and interaction of these elements can enhance or hinder overall performance.

1. Communication

  • Tall hierarchies can delay or distort messages as they pass through multiple layers. This can reduce clarity and increase chances of miscommunication.

  • Wide spans of control may lead to brief or informal communication, risking loss of detail.

  • Flat structures and decentralised models often lead to faster, clearer communication due to shorter chains of command.

  • Delegation enhances upward and lateral communication by encouraging involvement.

2. Efficiency

  • An appropriate span of control ensures tasks are well-managed without overwhelming supervisors.

  • Centralisation allows firms to standardise processes, which can lead to economies of scale.

  • However, decentralisation can reduce time delays and bottlenecks in operations, improving response times.

  • Delegating tasks to competent employees improves resource allocation and reduces management burden.

3. Employee Autonomy

  • Delegation and decentralisation promote a sense of ownership, which boosts motivation and commitment.

  • In flat structures, employees are closer to decision-makers and may feel more valued.

  • In contrast, tall structures or centralised models can limit autonomy, leading to frustration or disengagement among staff.

4. Responsiveness

  • Decentralised organisations are better able to react to market changes, customer needs, and technological shifts.

  • A flexible span of control, with delegated authority, allows quicker decisions on the ground.

  • Highly centralised businesses may struggle to adapt quickly, especially in fast-paced industries.

Interconnections and Strategic Considerations

Organisational design is not just a structural decision — it is a strategic one. Each element affects others:

  • Increasing the span of control tends to flatten the hierarchy, changing communication flows.

  • More delegation requires careful authority distribution and strong training.

  • Centralisation may enhance control but reduce local responsiveness.

  • Hierarchy levels determine how well delegation and communication function.

  • Poor alignment between elements can lead to inefficiencies, employee dissatisfaction, and missed opportunities.

For A-Level students, understanding these relationships is key to evaluating how well a business is structured to meet its objectives. Good organisational design ensures that the structure supports rather than hinders performance. Each element must be aligned with the company’s size, goals, and industry context.

FAQ

Organisational design plays a significant role in shaping employee motivation and satisfaction. Structures that offer autonomy, such as flat hierarchies and decentralised models, tend to empower staff, fostering a sense of ownership and engagement. Effective delegation builds trust and shows confidence in employees’ abilities, which boosts morale. Conversely, overly rigid or centralised designs can limit initiative, making employees feel undervalued or micromanaged. Well-defined roles, clear authority lines, and reasonable spans of control contribute to a supportive working environment that promotes satisfaction and reduces turnover.

Technology has transformed organisational design by enabling wider spans of control, flattening hierarchies, and improving internal communication. Digital tools like project management software, cloud systems, and communication platforms allow managers to supervise larger teams effectively without increasing face-to-face interaction. This supports more flexible, decentralised structures, especially in global or hybrid work settings. It also enhances transparency and speeds up decision-making, reducing the need for multiple hierarchical layers. Organisations now design structures that are more adaptable, data-driven, and collaborative due to technological integration.

Yes, many businesses adopt a hybrid structure that combines both centralised and decentralised elements. Core functions such as finance, compliance, and brand management are often centralised to ensure consistency and control. Meanwhile, operational decisions related to local marketing, staffing, or inventory management may be decentralised to improve responsiveness. This structure allows businesses to benefit from the efficiency and control of centralisation while also gaining the flexibility and local relevance offered by decentralisation. It’s particularly common in multinational or multi-divisional organisations.

Organisational design significantly affects both the speed and quality of decision-making. Flat, decentralised structures typically allow faster decisions as authority is closer to the action. Local managers can act swiftly without awaiting senior approval. However, this may reduce consistency and strategic alignment. Centralised structures may improve quality by involving experienced senior leaders, but decision speed often slows due to bureaucracy. The optimal design balances speed with oversight, ensuring timely decisions without sacrificing thoroughness or alignment with corporate goals.

Alignment between organisational design and business strategy ensures that the structure supports long-term objectives. For example, a business pursuing innovation needs a flat, flexible structure to encourage creativity and collaboration. In contrast, a cost-focused strategy might favour centralised control and efficiency. Misalignment can hinder progress—for instance, a highly centralised structure in a dynamic industry may delay responses to change. Effective alignment ensures resources are allocated efficiently, decision-making processes support goals, and the workforce is structured to drive strategic priorities.

Practice Questions

Explain how span of control can influence communication and efficiency within a business. (10 marks)

Span of control directly impacts communication and efficiency by shaping the flow of information and the level of managerial oversight. A wide span of control often leads to quicker communication due to fewer layers, allowing faster decision-making and reduced bureaucracy. However, it can strain managers and reduce individual supervision, potentially affecting performance. A narrow span enables closer monitoring, improving quality and accountability, but it may slow communication due to multiple hierarchical levels. This structure may also increase costs through additional managerial roles. The best approach depends on business size, employee skill level, and the complexity of operational tasks.

Analyse the benefits and drawbacks of decentralisation for a multinational business. (12 marks)

Decentralisation enables a multinational business to respond quickly to local market needs by empowering regional managers to make decisions. This enhances flexibility, improves customer satisfaction, and encourages innovation. It can also motivate employees by increasing autonomy and responsibility. However, decentralisation may lead to inconsistent decision-making, with variation in standards or branding across regions. It also increases training costs and requires trust in local leadership. For large firms like Unilever, the benefits of decentralisation often outweigh the drawbacks, provided there is strong communication and clear strategic alignment between headquarters and regional units to maintain overall business objectives.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email