TutorChase logo
Login
AQA A-Level Business

7.3.5 Elkington’s Triple Bottom Line (TBL)

Elkington’s Triple Bottom Line (TBL) is a model that expands how we evaluate business success by adding social and environmental performance to traditional financial metrics.

Definition of Elkington’s Triple Bottom Line

The Triple Bottom Line (TBL) is a sustainability framework developed by John Elkington in 1994. It challenges the conventional idea that business success should only be judged by profit, and instead promotes a broader approach based on three interconnected dimensions:

  • Profit – the financial outcomes of business activity

  • People – the impact on all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the wider society

  • Planet – the environmental consequences of business operations

TBL encourages companies to behave more responsibly and align their strategy with ethical, social, and environmental values. It promotes a long-term view of success, suggesting that sustainable business performance involves creating value not just for shareholders but for society and the environment too.

Businesses adopting this approach are often seen as more progressive, ethical, and in tune with modern consumer expectations. The TBL framework is widely used today in sustainability reporting, corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies, and non-financial disclosures.

The Three Pillars of the Triple Bottom Line

Profit

The Profit element remains essential. It covers all the traditional financial measures used to assess how well a business is performing economically. A company that is not profitable will struggle to survive, regardless of how socially or environmentally responsible it might be.

Examples of financial metrics under Profit include:

  • Revenue growth – increase in sales over time

  • Net profit margin – calculated as (Net profit / Revenue) × 100

  • Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) – a measure of the efficiency of capital use: Operating profit / Capital employed × 100

  • Cost efficiency – reducing operational waste, streamlining production, managing raw material usage

  • Market share – percentage of total sales in a market that a business controls

  • Cash flow health – ability to cover daily expenses and long-term investments

These metrics are usually reported in annual financial statements and are audited. They form the baseline for any business and help investors, shareholders, and managers make informed decisions.

People

The People pillar represents the social performance of a business. It examines how a company treats its internal and external stakeholders, such as employees, suppliers, customers, and the community.

Key aspects include:

  • Employee wellbeing: fair wages, safe working environments, reasonable working hours, health and safety provisions

  • Diversity and inclusion: promoting equality in hiring and career advancement

  • Training and development: investing in staff skills, career progression, and personal growth

  • Employee engagement: measuring satisfaction through surveys, suggestion schemes, staff retention

  • Fair trade and ethical sourcing: working only with suppliers who meet fair labour standards

  • Community involvement: donations, volunteering, supporting local charities, or sponsoring educational initiatives

  • Consumer protection and product safety: ensuring transparency, accurate labelling, and quality control

A strong ‘People’ focus can lead to higher employee retention, better customer loyalty, and a positive brand image. For example, a company like Ben & Jerry’s is known for its fair trade practices and progressive employment policies, which have built consumer trust and loyalty.

Planet

The Planet component refers to the environmental performance of a business. It considers how business activities affect the natural world and what is being done to minimise negative impacts.

Core environmental concerns include:

  • Carbon emissions: reducing CO2 output from factories, offices, logistics

  • Energy efficiency: using renewable energy, LED lighting, energy-efficient equipment

  • Waste reduction: increasing recycling, cutting down on packaging, reducing landfill contributions

  • Sustainable sourcing: using raw materials that are renewable, ethically sourced, or biodegradable

  • Water usage: conserving water in production processes

  • Impact on biodiversity: reducing habitat destruction, protecting endangered species

  • Environmental reporting and auditing: tracking emissions and setting environmental performance targets

An example of a company focused on Planet is Patagonia, which designs products with sustainable materials and encourages customers to repair and reuse items. Its ‘Don’t Buy This Jacket’ campaign promoted environmental awareness over consumption.

Benefits of the Triple Bottom Line Model

Encourages Broader Accountability

By extending performance beyond profits, the TBL encourages transparency and accountability in all aspects of business activity. It motivates companies to evaluate their actions based on wider social and environmental responsibilities.

Promotes Long-Term Strategic Thinking

Focusing on all three dimensions helps companies move away from short-termism. Instead of chasing quarterly profits, businesses are encouraged to build resilient, sustainable strategies that benefit future generations.

Strengthens Brand Image and Consumer Loyalty

Consumers increasingly favour brands that act ethically and responsibly. Companies that publish sustainability goals and demonstrate concern for the environment and society often see greater brand trust, positive media attention, and stronger customer loyalty.

Examples include:

  • LEGO: commitment to sustainable materials and carbon neutrality

  • The Body Shop: cruelty-free products and community trade initiatives

Enhances Employee Engagement

Staff are more motivated when they work for an organisation whose values align with their own. TBL practices can improve:

  • Job satisfaction

  • Organisational commitment

  • Recruitment appeal, especially among younger generations

For instance, companies offering mental health programmes, green offices, and staff development pathways often attract top talent.

Risk Management and Compliance

TBL helps businesses stay ahead of regulations. Companies that self-regulate environmental and social practices may avoid:

  • Fines from breaches of environmental laws

  • Reputational damage from unethical practices

  • Supply chain disruptions due to unsustainable practices

Access to Capital

Investors are increasingly adopting Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria in their decisions. TBL-focused businesses are more likely to receive backing from:

  • Ethical investment funds

  • Green bonds

  • Impact investors

Sustainability reporting based on TBL can enhance investor confidence.

Limitations of the Triple Bottom Line

Despite its advantages, the TBL model is not without flaws.

Subjective Measurement of People and Planet

While financial metrics are objective and standardised, ‘People’ and ‘Planet’ measures are often:

  • Qualitative rather than quantitative

  • Lacking in consistency across industries

  • Difficult to audit or compare

For example, how do you objectively compare two companies’ impact on biodiversity or employee happiness?

Lack of Universal Standards

There are no global rules defining what constitutes good performance in People and Planet categories. As a result:

  • Some firms may cherry-pick data

  • Others may greenwash – exaggerating or misrepresenting environmental achievements

  • Stakeholders may not trust reported non-financial data

This undermines the credibility of the TBL framework.

No Legal Enforcement

Unlike financial reporting, businesses are not legally required to follow the TBL model. Therefore, many companies:

  • Use it superficially for PR purposes

  • Focus mainly on Profit, with minimal changes to social or environmental behaviour

TBL success depends largely on leadership commitment and corporate culture, not regulation.

Difficult to Balance Competing Objectives

Often, a trade-off exists between the three pillars:

  • Reducing packaging may increase material costs

  • Increasing staff wages may lower profit margins

  • Switching to greener energy may involve upfront costs

For example, Tesla’s push for sustainability faces challenges with lithium mining’s environmental impact.

Smaller businesses, in particular, may struggle to invest in sustainability due to resource constraints.

Implementation Complexity

Proper implementation of TBL requires:

  • Developing new performance metrics

  • Investing in training and reporting tools

  • Aligning internal departments around shared values

Without proper integration, TBL may become an add-on rather than a core part of strategy.

Application in Modern Businesses

TBL and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

TBL often forms the backbone of a company’s CSR policy. Reports usually reflect:

  • Financial performance (Profit)

  • Community and employee initiatives (People)

  • Environmental impacts and targets (Planet)

Examples of CSR-aligned TBL in practice:

  • Unilever publishes annual sustainable living reports tracking health, hygiene, and climate impact

  • IKEA has committed to becoming climate positive by 2030 through supply chain changes

Role in Business Strategy

TBL helps guide decisions in areas such as:

  • Product development: eco-friendly packaging, biodegradable materials

  • Operations: optimising logistics to reduce emissions

  • Supplier choice: choosing partners based on labour practices and sustainability

  • Expansion: evaluating new markets for ethical risks

For example, a business might decide to delay a product launch until it ensures that the supply chain is free of modern slavery.

Sustainability Frameworks

TBL has inspired several standardised sustainability tools that help businesses measure performance:

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Offers guidelines for sustainability disclosures

  • Integrated Reporting (<IR>): Combines financial and non-financial reporting

  • Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Industry-specific reporting standards

These frameworks provide more structure and comparability, reducing subjectivity in assessing People and Planet.

Alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Many companies use TBL to align their efforts with global priorities.
Relevant goals include:

  • Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth (People and Profit)

  • Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production (Planet)

  • Goal 13: Climate Action (Planet)

Adopting these goals shows commitment to sustainability at a global scale and appeals to stakeholders with shared values.

Employment and Consumer Choice

Modern consumers and employees often choose brands aligned with their beliefs. Businesses using TBL to promote ethics and sustainability can:

  • Increase customer base among conscious buyers

  • Boost employee satisfaction and loyalty

  • Develop a culture of purpose-led innovation

For example, TOMS Shoes built its entire brand on social impact, giving away shoes for every pair sold, thereby focusing on People and attracting socially minded consumers.

TBL is therefore not just a reporting model—it is a strategic approach to building resilient, ethical, and sustainable businesses.

FAQ

While Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting can vary significantly between firms, Elkington’s Triple Bottom Line provides a structured framework for evaluating sustainability based on three specific pillars: Profit, People, and Planet. Traditional CSR often focuses on ad hoc or charitable activities and may lack measurement consistency. In contrast, the TBL aims to embed sustainability directly into core strategy and performance monitoring, requiring businesses to regularly report progress across all three areas rather than treating social and environmental responsibility as a separate, optional initiative.

Yes, small businesses can apply the Triple Bottom Line, although their approach may be less formal than large corporations. Many small enterprises already integrate social and environmental values by sourcing locally, minimising waste, or supporting community projects. While they may not have the same resources to produce full-scale sustainability reports, the TBL can still guide ethical decision-making. The key is tailoring the model to their capacity, using simple, measurable actions to track and improve sustainability alongside profitability.

The Triple Bottom Line influences supply chain decisions by requiring businesses to evaluate suppliers not just on cost and efficiency, but also on ethical and environmental grounds. Companies may avoid suppliers who exploit workers or harm ecosystems, even if they are cheaper. Instead, they may prioritise fair trade, sustainable sourcing, and transparency. This shift can lead to stronger long-term supplier relationships, better risk management, and alignment with customer expectations for ethical production—despite potentially higher costs or more complex logistics.

Investors increasingly assess Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors, and companies using the Triple Bottom Line can appeal to ethical and sustainable investment funds. By demonstrating commitment to long-term sustainability and responsible governance, businesses reduce reputational risk and show forward-thinking leadership. TBL reporting offers transparency that helps investors evaluate potential beyond profit figures. Firms with strong TBL performance may access new sources of capital, including green bonds and impact investment, giving them an advantage in competitive financial markets.

Some stakeholders, particularly shareholders focused on short-term financial returns, may resist the Triple Bottom Line due to concerns that it diverts resources away from profitability. Investing in employee wellbeing or environmental initiatives can involve upfront costs with uncertain returns. Operational changes, such as switching to sustainable suppliers, may disrupt existing arrangements. Additionally, internal resistance can arise if staff perceive TBL goals as unrealistic or tokenistic. Overcoming resistance requires clear communication, leadership support, and evidence of the long-term strategic benefits.

Practice Questions

Explain one benefit and one limitation to a business of using Elkington’s Triple Bottom Line as a performance measurement tool. (10 marks)

One benefit of using Elkington’s Triple Bottom Line is that it encourages a more holistic evaluation of business performance by considering social and environmental impacts alongside profit. This can improve the company’s ethical image and appeal to socially conscious stakeholders. However, a limitation is the difficulty of measuring the People and Planet dimensions objectively, as they lack standardised metrics. This can result in inconsistent reporting and challenges in comparing performance across businesses. The lack of legal enforcement may also reduce its practical impact, especially if the business prioritises short-term financial results over long-term sustainability goals.

Analyse how adopting the Triple Bottom Line model might affect the strategic decisions made by a large manufacturing business. (12 marks)

Adopting the Triple Bottom Line may significantly influence a manufacturing firm’s strategic decisions by integrating sustainability into operations. For example, the business might invest in cleaner production technology to reduce environmental harm (Planet), even if it increases costs in the short term. Social considerations (People), such as improving worker conditions, may lead to higher wages or additional training. These changes can enhance reputation and attract skilled staff. However, focusing on sustainability might require trade-offs with profitability (Profit), particularly if competitors maintain lower costs. Overall, the model could shift strategic priorities towards long-term ethical performance over immediate financial gain.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email