TutorChase logo
Login
AQA A-Level Business

7.4.2 Laws Affecting Competition, Labour Markets, and the Environment

Political and legal regulations shape business behaviour, influencing strategies, operations, and long-term success. This section explores how key UK laws impact firms in practice.

Competition Law

The UK competition framework is designed to ensure fair and open markets, prevent abuse of power, and encourage innovation, efficiency, and consumer choice. It plays a critical role in shaping how businesses grow, price products, and interact with competitors.

Anti-Monopoly Legislation

  • Objective: To prevent firms from gaining or abusing a dominant position in the market.

  • Dominant position is generally defined as holding 40% or more of market share in a given sector.

  • Key legislation: The Competition Act 1998 and The Enterprise Act 2002.

  • Behaviours prohibited under UK law include:

    • Predatory pricing – setting prices artificially low to drive out competitors.

    • Excessive pricing – exploiting consumers through unreasonably high prices.

    • Refusing to supply certain customers without valid justification.

    • Exclusive contracts that prevent rivals from entering the market.

Strategic Implications:

  • Firms must ensure they avoid abusing dominance or risk CMA investigations.

  • Large firms may voluntarily notify the Competition and Markets Authority if their practices could be seen as anti-competitive.

  • Non-compliance can result in:

    • Fines up to 10% of global turnover.

    • Director disqualification.

    • Damage to brand reputation and legal costs.

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)

  • Monitored by: The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), an independent regulator.

  • Mergers are scrutinised if:

    • The merged entity will have 25%+ market share, or

    • The businesses have a combined UK turnover of £70 million or more.

  • The CMA can block mergers, require divestments, or accept undertakings in lieu of investigation.

Strategic Implications:

  • Firms engaging in M&A must consider:

    • Legal fees for competition clearance.

    • The likelihood of market dominance.

    • The possibility of conditional approvals (e.g. selling certain assets).

  • In some cases, firms may decide to cancel or alter a merger to avoid regulatory barriers.

Pricing Regulation

  • Price fixing, market sharing, and output limitation are illegal under both UK and EU law.

  • Firms cannot:

    • Collude with competitors to fix prices.

    • Divide up customers or geographic regions.

    • Limit production artificially to manipulate price.

  • Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is also prohibited. Manufacturers cannot:

    • Force or pressure retailers to sell at a set price.

    • Penalise retailers for discounting.

Strategic Implications:

  • Businesses must have clear policies to ensure employees do not engage in unlawful pricing practices.

  • Sales staff and executives should be trained to recognise and avoid collusive behaviour.

  • Internal audits and whistleblowing protections help detect violations early.

Labour Market Law

UK labour law aims to promote fair treatment of workers while giving businesses flexibility. It governs pay, working conditions, equal opportunities, and the right to work.

Minimum Wage and National Living Wage

  • Set by: The UK government, based on recommendations from the Low Pay Commission.

  • As of 2025, the National Living Wage applies to workers aged 21 and over.

  • Employers must pay at least:

    • National Living Wage (NLW): £11.44 per hour (example)

    • National Minimum Wage (NMW): lower rates for apprentices and younger workers.

Strategic Implications:

  • Labour-intensive businesses such as hospitality, retail, and care face higher wage bills.

  • May need to:

    • Reduce staff hours or increase automation.

    • Reassess pricing to protect margins.

    • Shift operations to lower-cost regions or restructure roles.

Failure to comply leads to:

  • Back-pay orders.

  • Naming and shaming by HMRC.

  • Financial penalties up to 200% of the amount owed.

Working Hours and Conditions

  • Regulated by the Working Time Regulations 1998.

  • Workers are entitled to:

    • A maximum 48-hour working week (averaged over 17 weeks).

    • 11 hours rest between shifts.

    • A 20-minute break for shifts over 6 hours.

    • 28 days paid holiday per year (including public holidays).

  • Opt-outs are allowed, but must be voluntary and documented.

Strategic Implications:

  • Employers must maintain accurate time records and ensure rotas comply with legislation.

  • Failing to adhere could lead to:

    • Employment tribunals.

    • Compensation claims.

    • Disruption to employee morale and productivity.

Discrimination and Equal Opportunities

  • Covered under: The Equality Act 2010.

  • Protects workers from discrimination based on:

    • Age

    • Disability

    • Gender reassignment

    • Marriage and civil partnership

    • Pregnancy and maternity

    • Race

    • Religion or belief

    • Sex

    • Sexual orientation

  • Applies to:

    • Recruitment

    • Pay and benefits

    • Training and promotion

    • Dismissal and redundancy

Strategic Implications:

  • Businesses should implement:

    • Diversity and inclusion policies.

    • Regular anti-discrimination training.

    • Fair and transparent recruitment procedures.

  • Benefits include:

    • Access to a wider talent pool.

    • Enhanced brand image.

    • Avoidance of costly employment tribunal claims.

Environmental Protection Law

Environmental law seeks to minimise the negative impact of business on the planet. It affects manufacturing, logistics, energy, and product development strategies.

Emissions Limits and Carbon Regulation

  • UK law aligns with the Climate Change Act 2008 and Net Zero 2050 goal.

  • Firms are subject to:

    • The UK Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): businesses must buy allowances for each tonne of CO2 they emit.

    • Carbon pricing: taxes levied on carbon-intensive activities.

    • Sector-specific limits on emissions in industries such as power generation, construction, and agriculture.

Strategic Implications:

  • High-emitting firms face pressure to:

    • Invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy.

    • Offset emissions using carbon credits or reforestation.

    • Report emissions through frameworks like Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR).

Failure to comply can result in:

  • Fines per tonne of unreported emissions.

  • Loss of operating licences.

  • Negative impact on investor relations and customer loyalty.

Packaging and Waste Regulations

  • Governed by the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007.

  • Firms must:

    • Minimise unnecessary packaging.

    • Ensure recyclability and material recovery.

    • Fund the collection and recycling of packaging waste under Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) rules.

  • Plastic Packaging Tax (PPT) introduced in 2022 charges £210.82 per tonne for packaging with less than 30% recycled content.

Strategic Implications:

  • Product design must now consider lifecycle impact and ease of recycling.

  • Supply chains may need restructuring to use more sustainable materials.

  • Packaging innovations offer:

    • Brand differentiation.

    • Reduced regulatory burden.

    • Access to green product markets.

Carbon Taxes and Green Incentives

  • Businesses may be subject to:

    • Fuel duty on transport emissions.

    • Climate Change Levy (CCL) on business energy use.

    • Landfill tax for waste disposal.

  • Government also provides:

    • Capital allowances for energy-saving investments.

    • Innovation funding for clean tech start-ups.

    • Procurement preferences for low-carbon suppliers.

Strategic Implications:

  • Firms should:

    • Conduct cost–benefit analyses of low-carbon strategies.

    • Incorporate sustainability KPIs into performance tracking.

    • Develop partnerships with green suppliers to reduce overall footprint.

Strategic Implications of Compliance vs. Non-Compliance

Compliance Costs

  • Often includes:

    • Hiring compliance officers or legal consultants.

    • Staff training and documentation systems.

    • Investments in monitoring technologies (e.g. emissions sensors).

    • Internal audits and reporting to demonstrate due diligence.

While costly upfront, it:

  • Reduces legal risk.

  • Enhances investor confidence and brand trust.

  • Enables smoother entry into foreign markets with similar standards.

Non-Compliance Risks

  • Financial:

    • Large fines and backdated payments.

    • Loss of tax reliefs or grants.

  • Operational:

    • Shutdowns or restrictions.

    • Delays in product launches.

  • Reputational:

    • Public boycotts or negative press.

    • Lower employee morale.

  • Legal:

    • Criminal proceedings (e.g. for environmental or cartel offences).

    • Lengthy and costly litigation.

Regulation as a Source of Competitive Advantage

Rather than a constraint, regulation can serve as a strategic enabler.

Driving Innovation

  • Firms forced to comply with tough standards often become pioneers in their field.

  • Examples:

    • Engineering firms developing zero-emissions machinery.

    • Tech start-ups providing AI tools for compliance tracking.

  • Leads to first-mover advantages, licensing opportunities, and patent revenue.

Differentiation and Brand Reputation

  • Compliance enables ethical branding, which appeals to:

    • Ethical investors.

    • Environmentally conscious consumers.

    • Young, socially aware job seekers.

  • Examples:

    • Retailers promoting plastic-free packaging.

    • Employers highlighting gender pay equality.

    • Energy providers focusing on renewable-only tariffs.

Influencing Future Legislation

  • Large, compliant firms often sit on industry advisory panels.

  • They can influence policy direction, shaping rules to reflect:

    • Sector-specific challenges.

    • Feasibility and cost realities.

    • Innovation incentives.

  • Example: Automotive firms lobbying for realistic EV charging targets alongside emissions reductions.

By understanding and adapting to the legal environment, businesses can move from reactive compliance to proactive strategy, turning challenges into competitive advantage.

FAQ

Labour market regulation in the UK, such as the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, ensures that temporary staff receive equal treatment after 12 weeks in the same role. This limits the flexibility businesses previously had with outsourcing or using short-term contracts. Firms must now provide similar pay, holidays, and working conditions to those of permanent staff, which can increase costs. Additionally, anti-avoidance measures prevent employers from rotating staff to avoid compliance. These laws encourage fair treatment but reduce cost-saving incentives associated with casual labour strategies.

The CMA is the UK’s main competition watchdog, responsible for investigating mergers, enforcing competition law, and protecting consumer interests. It can launch formal investigations into anti-competitive practices, such as price-fixing cartels, and has powers to impose fines, ban directors, or require structural changes in businesses. The CMA also reviews mergers that risk reducing competition and may block or attach conditions to them. Its enforcement work includes sector studies, dawn raids, and detailed analysis of firm behaviour, making it a powerful influence on strategic decision-making.

Yes, increasingly so. Investors and banks are prioritising firms that demonstrate environmental responsibility through ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria. Complying with environmental regulations—such as reducing emissions, using recyclable packaging, or meeting sustainability targets—can improve a firm’s creditworthiness and attract ethical investment. Many institutional investors screen out non-compliant or high-emission firms. In addition, government-backed green finance initiatives and sustainability-linked loans offer favourable rates or terms to environmentally responsible businesses, making compliance a strategic advantage for securing future funding.

Anti-competitive practices, such as colluding with competitors or abusing market dominance, are illegal under the Competition Act 1998 and can lead to heavy penalties. In contrast, aggressive yet legal tactics include price wars, exclusive contracts with valid justifications, or innovation-led disruption. The key distinction lies in intent and outcome: if actions restrict market competition unfairly or exploit dominance without consumer benefit, they are unlawful. Legal tactics must remain within ethical boundaries and not involve coercion, deception, or deliberate exclusion of rivals without justification.

SMEs often lack the legal expertise, financial resources, and administrative capacity of larger firms, making compliance more burdensome. Understanding complex legislation like the Equality Act or Packaging Waste Regulations requires time and specialist advice, which can be costly. Environmental reporting, for example, may involve new systems, audits, or certification processes. Additionally, penalties for non-compliance apply regardless of business size, creating significant risk. While regulations apply universally, SMEs often call for simplified rules or tailored support to level the playing field.

Practice Questions

Analyse how environmental legislation might influence the strategic decisions of a large manufacturing business. (10 marks)

Environmental legislation such as emissions limits and carbon taxes can significantly impact a manufacturer’s strategy. A firm may invest in greener technologies to reduce carbon output and avoid future penalties. Strategic decisions might include relocating production, redesigning processes to be more energy-efficient, or introducing sustainable product lines to align with environmental expectations. Compliance can also enhance brand reputation and appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. However, it may increase short-term costs and require changes to supply chains or production methods. Ultimately, such legislation can both constrain and drive innovation within long-term strategic planning for competitive advantage.

Assess the potential impact of competition law on a firm planning a merger. (12 marks)

Competition law, monitored by the CMA, plays a critical role in assessing mergers. If the combined entity gains over 25% market share or meets the £70 million turnover threshold, the CMA may investigate to prevent reduced competition. This could delay or block the merger, or require asset disposals. Strategic implications include higher legal costs, reputational risks, and the need for contingency plans. However, compliance may safeguard consumer interests and ensure fair market dynamics. If cleared, the firm could benefit from increased scale and efficiency. The final impact depends on market context and how the firm navigates the legal process.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email