TutorChase logo
Login
AQA A-Level Business

8.1.3 Evaluating the Value and Risks of Ansoff Strategies

A firm’s choice of strategic direction through the Ansoff Matrix must consider both the growth potential and the associated risks of each option.

Value of Each Strategic Option in Achieving Growth

Market Penetration

Definition:
Market penetration involves increasing sales of existing products within existing markets. This is typically done through strategies such as promotional campaigns, competitive pricing, increasing product usage, or improving product availability.

Value:

  • Speed of implementation:

    • Market penetration is often the fastest route to growth, as it does not require new product development or unfamiliar market entry.

    • Firms already have the necessary market knowledge, infrastructure, and customer base.

    • Can be implemented through short-term tactics like sales promotions, advertising, or loyalty schemes.

  • Return on investment (ROI):

    • The ROI can be very high due to relatively low additional costs.

    • Since the product is already in the market, companies avoid upfront R&D or setup costs.

    • Effective use of existing assets and economies of scale can further enhance profitability.

  • Alignment with core competences:

    • This strategy is highly aligned with the firm’s current strengths, such as brand reputation, distribution channels, and marketing capability.

    • It allows the firm to consolidate its market position and defend against competition.

Example:

  • McDonald’s has successfully used this strategy by encouraging existing customers to increase their purchase frequency. Initiatives like the McCafé loyalty programme and mobile ordering are designed to deepen engagement in existing markets.

Market Development

Definition:
Market development involves selling existing products in new markets. This may include expansion into new geographical territories, targeting new customer segments, or adapting current products for slightly different market needs.

Value:

  • Speed of implementation:

    • The speed can vary; entering culturally or geographically similar markets is usually faster.

    • For example, a UK-based firm entering the Irish market faces fewer barriers than entering markets in Asia or Africa.

  • Return on investment:

    • The ROI depends on market potential and entry costs.

    • In high-growth or less saturated markets, the ROI can be significant.

    • If a brand is already strong globally, its transferability can increase success.

  • Alignment with core competences:

    • Partially aligned; success depends on how well the business model and branding can be transferred to the new market.

    • Companies may rely on existing logistics, digital platforms, or marketing techniques.

Example:

  • Starbucks’ expansion into China required changes such as including green tea-based drinks, adapting store layouts, and creating partnerships with local firms. The brand’s core offering remained the same, but cultural adaptation was crucial to achieving market development success.

Product Development

Definition:
Product development entails creating new products to serve existing markets. This could involve innovation, modification of existing products, or development of completely new product lines.

Value:

  • Speed of implementation:

    • Generally slower due to product design, development, testing, and rollout phases.

    • Regulatory approvals and market readiness may also delay launch.

  • Return on investment:

    • ROI can be very high if the product meets a genuine market need and differentiates itself effectively.

    • However, there is also a higher failure rate, particularly in competitive or saturated markets.

  • Alignment with core competences:

    • Works well if the firm has strong research and development (R&D), brand innovation, or customer insight.

    • Allows the company to leverage market knowledge to introduce products more likely to succeed.

Example:

  • Apple’s launch of the Apple Watch is a classic product development example. It built on Apple’s strong brand identity, iOS integration, and innovation in design and health tracking. It allowed Apple to deepen customer relationships within its existing base.

Diversification

Definition:
Diversification involves entering new markets with new products. It is the most ambitious and riskiest strategic option in the Ansoff Matrix. It may be related (e.g. leveraging brand or technology) or unrelated (e.g. entering completely different industries).

Value:

  • Speed of implementation:

    • This strategy is typically the slowest to implement due to extensive research, resource acquisition, and strategy formulation.

    • Companies often conduct pilot testing or enter through joint ventures or acquisitions to accelerate the process.

  • Return on investment:

    • High potential ROI in the long term, especially if the new market is underserved or has high demand.

    • However, uncertainty is significant, and returns may take years to materialise.

  • Alignment with core competences:

    • Usually low, unless the diversification is related. Unrelated diversification often requires acquiring new capabilities, hiring new teams, or building new infrastructure.

Example:

  • Virgin Group’s move from music to airlines and financial services represents a bold diversification strategy. While the Virgin brand helped, each market had its own competitive dynamics, requiring tailored strategies.

Risks and Challenges of Each Strategic Option

Market Penetration

Key Risks:

  • Market saturation:

    • If the market is mature, there may be limited potential to increase sales volumes.

    • Competing firms may already dominate market share.

  • Competitive retaliation:

    • Aggressive price cuts or promotional tactics may prompt rivals to respond, sparking price wars or margin erosion.

  • Overdependence:

    • Heavy reliance on a single market or product may expose the firm to macroeconomic or regulatory shifts.

Market Development

Key Risks:

  • Cultural and language barriers:

    • Misunderstanding consumer behaviour, expectations, and customs can hinder acceptance.

  • Regulatory issues and trade barriers:

    • Each country or region may have specific legal requirements, import taxes, or restrictions that make entry difficult.

  • Operational infrastructure:

    • New logistics, distribution, or customer service operations may need to be established, increasing complexity.

Example:

  • Tesco’s failed entry into the US with Fresh & Easy stemmed from a lack of understanding of American consumer habits (e.g. preference for large shopping trips rather than quick, fresh, daily purchases) and insufficient trialling of formats.

Product Development

Key Risks:

  • High R&D costs:

    • Creating new products often involves significant upfront investment in design, materials, testing, and patents.

  • Product failure:

    • Even well-researched products can fail due to misjudged demand, poor design, or stronger competing offerings.

  • Cannibalisation of existing products:

    • New products may replace sales of existing ones, reducing the overall benefit unless total revenue increases.

Example:

  • The introduction of “New Coke” in the 1980s by Coca-Cola illustrates poor product development. Despite market testing, customers reacted negatively, and the company had to revert to its original formula.

Diversification

Key Risks:

  • Highest level of uncertainty:

    • Firms face risk on both product and market dimensions.

    • Potential for significant financial losses if incorrect assumptions are made.

  • Inadequate capabilities:

    • Entering a new industry often requires skills, systems, and knowledge the firm does not possess.

  • Resource diversion:

    • Capital, talent, and attention are diverted from the core business, potentially weakening overall performance.

Example:

  • Quaker Oats’ acquisition of Snapple in 1994 was a failed diversification attempt. Quaker paid 1.7billionbutsoldSnapple27monthslaterfor1.7 billion but sold Snapple 27 months later for 300 million due to brand mismanagement, distribution errors, and cultural disconnect with Snapple’s identity.

Real Case Studies Assessing Ansoff Strategies

Apple – Product Development

  • Apple consistently invests in product development, with successful innovations like the iPad, AirPods, and Apple Watch.

  • Leverages existing customers through the Apple ecosystem (iCloud, iOS compatibility).

  • Value lies in:

    • Technological leadership

    • Design excellence

    • Premium branding

  • Risk involves high R&D and production costs, but brand loyalty often mitigates launch risk.

Netflix – Market Development

  • Netflix expanded globally from its US base, entering markets in Europe, Asia, and Latin America.

  • Success factors:

    • Scalable digital delivery

    • Localisation of content and interfaces

    • Strategic partnerships (e.g. telecom bundles)

  • Faced challenges like:

    • Government regulation in India and China

    • Competition from local streaming services

  • Still, international subscriptions now represent over 50% of revenue, validating market development as a growth strategy.

Samsung – Diversification

  • Samsung started in trading and moved into electronics, heavy industries, and construction.

  • Diversification was strategic and gradual, backed by:

    • Substantial capital investment

    • Government support in South Korea

    • Focus on vertical integration (e.g. producing their own chips and displays)

  • Today, Samsung is a global leader in semiconductors, mobile devices, and appliances, showing that with careful planning, diversification can yield significant rewards.

Strategic Evaluation Criteria

When assessing which Ansoff strategy to pursue, firms often consider:

Speed of Implementation

  • Market penetration:

    • Shortest lead time. Can take months if using promotions, pricing changes, or minor updates.

  • Product development:

    • Longer due to innovation and regulatory testing; typically a 1–2 year timeline for full rollout.

  • Market development:

    • Speed varies; entering similar markets may take a few months, but unfamiliar ones may take over a year.

  • Diversification:

    • May require multiple years of preparation, especially if it involves acquisitions or entering regulated sectors.

Return on Investment (ROI)

  • Firms need to compare expected profits to initial investment and operating costs:

    • ROI = (Net Profit / Investment Cost) x 100

  • Market penetration often yields the highest ROI with the lowest risk.

  • Diversification may have the lowest short-term ROI, but can offer long-term security and growth.

Alignment with Core Competences

  • Strategies that use a firm's current assets and expertise are more likely to succeed.

    • Market penetration and product development are generally the most aligned.

    • Diversification needs either internal skill development or external acquisition of expertise.

A firm’s success in using the Ansoff Matrix ultimately depends on how well it balances the value of each strategic path against the risks involved, ensuring decisions are based on robust data, aligned goals, and clear long-term planning.

FAQ

Diversification is the riskiest because it involves entering completely new markets with new products, requiring knowledge and capabilities that the business may not possess. Even if a firm has strong financial resources, that capital can be wasted if it lacks market insight, cultural awareness, or operational competence in the new area. Additionally, diversification may stretch managerial focus and dilute the brand if the new venture conflicts with the firm’s existing identity. Financial backing helps, but it doesn’t eliminate the deep strategic uncertainty inherent in diversification.

To reduce market development risks, a business should conduct thorough market research to understand cultural norms, customer behaviour, and legal frameworks in the new market. Using local partnerships or joint ventures can help navigate unfamiliar environments and establish trust. Businesses should also pilot their entry on a small scale before full expansion. Tailoring marketing, adapting products slightly, and training local staff ensure smoother integration. Entering markets with similar demographics or consumer expectations also helps lower the degree of strategic risk.

Brand strength plays a critical role, especially in market development and product development. A strong brand builds trust, making it easier to enter new markets or launch new products without starting from scratch. In product development, loyal customers are more likely to try new offerings from a brand they trust. In market development, a recognised global brand can create instant credibility. However, brand strength alone is not enough—it must be supported by product quality, strategic execution, and local adaptation when necessary.

Yes, businesses often use multiple Ansoff strategies simultaneously. For example, a company might engage in market penetration by increasing sales in its existing markets while also pursuing product development to meet evolving customer needs. Large firms, especially multinationals, may diversify into unrelated markets while developing new products for current markets. The key is ensuring that each strategy is aligned with the firm’s overall objectives and that resources are available to manage the demands of multiple strategic directions without compromising core operations.

Digital transformation can significantly improve the feasibility of all Ansoff strategies. For market penetration, digital tools enhance customer engagement, data analytics, and targeted marketing. In market development, e-commerce platforms enable businesses to enter new geographical markets without a physical presence. Product development benefits from faster innovation cycles and customer feedback loops enabled by technology. Even diversification becomes more accessible through digital channels that lower entry barriers. However, firms must invest in digital capabilities and data security to maximise benefits and minimise digital-related risks.

Practice Questions

Analyse the potential risks a business may face when adopting a diversification strategy as part of its strategic direction. (9 marks)

Diversification poses high risks due to the dual uncertainty of entering both new markets and launching new products. A business may lack the knowledge or infrastructure needed, leading to poor decision-making and inefficient operations. Financial risk is high, as significant capital is often invested in unfamiliar areas. There’s also the challenge of cultural and regulatory differences in new markets, which can affect performance. Brand dilution may occur if the new venture does not align with the business’s core identity. Overall, diversification demands extensive planning, research, and capability development to mitigate such strategic risks effectively.

Evaluate whether product development is a suitable strategy for a technology business looking to grow. (16 marks)

Product development can be highly suitable for a technology business aiming for growth, particularly if it has strong R&D capabilities. It allows the business to innovate within its existing customer base, enhancing brand loyalty and market share. However, the strategy carries high costs and the risk of product failure, which may impact profitability. If the market is already saturated or innovation cycles are short, returns could be limited. A well-resourced tech business with a culture of innovation may succeed, especially if it aligns new products with customer needs. Therefore, suitability depends on internal capabilities and market conditions.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email