TutorChase logo
Login
OCR A-Level History Study Notes

28.2.3 Results Revolutions

OCR Specification focus:
‘the results of the revolutions ; the’

Introduction
The revolutions of 1848–1849 marked a turning point in Italian history, exposing nationalist ambitions, highlighting liberal weaknesses, and reshaping the political landscape despite ultimate failures.

Immediate Results of the Revolutions

The revolutions of 1848–1849 erupted across the Italian peninsula, affecting Lombardy, Piedmont, Naples, Venice, and Rome. Despite widespread enthusiasm, the uprisings were ultimately suppressed. Their immediate results were significant:

  • Restoration of conservative power: Monarchs and conservative regimes, with Austrian military backing, reasserted control.

  • Short-lived governments: Provisional revolutionary governments collapsed swiftly under external and internal pressures.

  • Return of Austrian dominance: Austria re-established itself as the leading power in northern and central Italy.

  • Papal authority restored: The Pope regained temporal control after a republican interlude in Rome.

Restoration: The re-establishment of traditional monarchical or conservative authority after a period of revolutionary or liberal government.

Although many revolutions failed militarily, they left a legacy of political learning and exposed deep divisions within the nationalist movement.

Political Consequences

Defeat of Liberal and Nationalist Hopes

The revolutions failed to achieve either Italian unification or lasting constitutional reform. Liberals were unable to consolidate power, while divisions between moderates and radicals weakened the nationalist cause.

Survival of Monarchy

  • Charles Albert of Piedmont attempted to lead nationalist efforts against Austria but was defeated at Novara (1849). His abdication in favour of Victor Emmanuel II preserved the monarchy and created continuity in Piedmontese leadership.

  • Other rulers, such as Ferdinand II in Naples, returned strengthened, having crushed opposition.

Papal Position

The Papal States were briefly transformed into the Roman Republic in 1849, led by Mazzinians and defended by Garibaldi. However, French intervention restored Pope Pius IX, marking a dramatic shift: he abandoned earlier liberal reforms and aligned with conservative powers thereafter.

Social Consequences

Popular Disillusionment

The revolutions showed the limits of mass mobilisation:

  • Peasantry remained largely disengaged, focused on local grievances rather than nationalist ideals.

  • Urban elites often lacked unity, torn between liberal constitutionalism and radical republicanism.

The revolutions highlighted the difficulty of creating a broad-based nationalist movement.

Growth of Political Awareness

Despite failures, the revolutions spread ideas of:

  • National identity: Greater awareness of “Italian-ness” across different regions.

  • Democratic ideals: Continued influence of figures like Mazzini, despite his setbacks.

  • Military heroism: Garibaldi’s defence of Rome enhanced his reputation, inspiring later nationalist struggles.

Military Outcomes

The revolutions exposed the military imbalance between Italian forces and Austria:

  • Austrian victories at Custoza (1848) and Novara (1849) reasserted their dominance.

File:Lombardo Veneto.svg

Map of the Kingdom of Lombardy–Venetia, the Habsburg-controlled core of northern Italy after 1848–1849. Borders and regions are clearly marked, aiding spatial understanding of Austrian power. Source

  • Italian armies were often poorly organised, divided, and inexperienced, limiting effectiveness.

  • Volunteer forces, such as Garibaldi’s, gained prestige but lacked the resources to match professional armies.

Volunteer Army: A military force composed of individuals who enlist willingly, often motivated by ideology or nationalism, rather than being conscripted.

This imbalance underlined the necessity of foreign support or stronger leadership for future nationalist efforts.

Long-Term Significance

Lessons Learned

Although the revolutions were suppressed, they provided crucial lessons:

  • Need for unity: Divisions between moderates and radicals weakened efforts.

  • Importance of leadership: Piedmont emerged as the most credible leader of the nationalist cause.

  • Role of foreign powers: Austrian, French, and papal interventions showed that unification could not be achieved without international diplomacy.

Piedmont’s Position

While most revolutions collapsed, Piedmont retained its constitutional monarchy under Victor Emmanuel II. This survival was significant:

  • It gave Italy a constitutional base that would later support unification.

  • It preserved a liberal constitution (Statuto Albertino), contrasting with authoritarian regimes elsewhere.

  • It established Piedmont as the nucleus for future nationalist aspirations.

Decline of Papal Liberalism

The experience of 1848–1849 transformed Pope Pius IX from a seemingly reformist figure into a reactionary opponent of nationalism. His rejection of modern liberalism entrenched the divide between the Church and Italian nationalism.

Legacy for Nationalists

Although defeated, revolutionary leaders gained enduring reputations:

  • Mazzini’s republicanism continued to inspire radicals.

  • Garibaldi’s military reputation foreshadowed his decisive role in the 1860s.

  • The failures created a myth of martyrdom for the nationalist cause, energising future generations.

Results Summarised

The results of the revolutions of 1848–1849 can be summarised as follows:

  • Immediate suppression of revolutions and restoration of conservative order.

  • Failure of liberal constitutions and nationalist unification.

  • Austrian dominance reaffirmed in northern Italy.

  • Papal conservatism entrenched after restoration by French troops.

  • Piedmont’s survival as a constitutional monarchy, creating a future base for unification.

  • Enhanced reputations of nationalist figures, particularly Garibaldi.

  • Greater political awareness, despite disillusionment among the masses.

The revolutions ultimately failed in their goals, but their results reshaped Italian politics, highlighting the weaknesses of fragmented nationalism while laying foundations for the Risorgimento that followed.

FAQ

Italian revolutions suffered from deep regional divisions and conflicting aims. Liberals sought constitutional monarchy, while radicals pushed for republicanism, preventing coordinated strategy.

Austria’s strong military presence, particularly in Lombardy–Venetia, ensured rapid suppression. Foreign intervention by France in Rome and Austrian dominance elsewhere left little space for revolutionary governments to consolidate.

The absence of broad peasant support further weakened momentum, making the Italian revolutions more fragile than uprisings in parts of central Europe.



Garibaldi led volunteers against French troops during the defence of the Roman Republic in 1849. Although the Republic fell, his bravery gained legendary status.

He became a symbol of determined resistance and sacrifice for Italy’s nationalist cause. This reputation allowed him to rally widespread support during the later expedition of the Thousand in 1860.

His involvement demonstrated the importance of charismatic leadership, even in defeat, in sustaining nationalist sentiment.


Foreign powers were decisive in ensuring the revolutions failed.

  • Austria crushed uprisings in Lombardy and Piedmont with superior military strength.

  • France intervened in Rome, ending the Republic and reinstating Papal rule.

These interventions highlighted Italy’s vulnerability and showed that external forces, not domestic revolutionaries, dictated the political outcome.


Initially seen as a reformer, Pius IX introduced modest reforms and inspired hopes for liberal change.

However, his forced exile during the Roman Republic, and restoration by French troops, convinced him that liberalism threatened papal authority.

From 1849 onwards, he firmly rejected constitutionalism and nationalism, positioning the Papacy as a conservative force hostile to unification.


Piedmont’s decision to keep its constitution gave it a unique status among Italian states.

  • It maintained a constitutional monarchy under Victor Emmanuel II.

  • It provided a political framework for moderate liberals when other states returned to absolutism.

  • It created a foundation for Piedmont to lead future nationalist movements, as no other Italian state offered similar political freedoms.

This continuity proved crucial for later stages of the Risorgimento.


Practice Questions

Question 1 (2 marks)
In which year did the Roman Republic collapse, leading to the restoration of Pope Pius IX?


Mark Scheme

  • 1 mark for correct year: 1849.

  • No marks for incorrect or approximate answers (e.g. “1850s” or “1848”).

  • Maximum 2 marks awarded only if the year is precisely stated as 1849.

Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain two significant results of the Italian revolutions of 1848–1849.


Mark Scheme

  • Up to 3 marks for each result explained clearly (maximum 6).

  • Answers may include, but are not limited to:

    • Restoration of Austrian dominance: Austrian victories at Custoza and Novara reasserted Habsburg control in Lombardy–Venetia and undermined nationalist hopes. (Up to 3 marks depending on clarity and depth.)

    • Return of conservative authority in the Papal States: French intervention restored Pope Pius IX, leading to his rejection of liberal reform and strengthened conservatism. (Up to 3 marks.)

    • Survival of Piedmont’s constitution: Despite Charles Albert’s abdication, Victor Emmanuel II retained the Statuto Albertino, ensuring Piedmont’s role as a future base for unification. (Up to 3 marks.)

  • Award full marks where answers provide specific detail and clear explanation of significance, not just identification.

  • Maximum 6 marks.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email