OCR Specification focus:
‘kingship; the impact of settlements on livelihood (including farming, craft-working, trade); the move towards a united English kingdom.’
The development of Viking settlements reshaped political authority, livelihoods, and leadership in northern Europe, with kingship and settlement-driven changes paving the way for lasting transformations.
Kingship and Viking Settlements
Kingship Defined
Kingship: The institution of royal authority where a king served as leader, lawgiver, military commander, and symbolic focus of unity in Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon contexts.
Kingship was central to Viking and Anglo-Saxon society. The rise of settlements created both challenges and opportunities for rulers: expanding territories required stronger political oversight, while access to agricultural surpluses, trade, and craft-working supported royal power. Kingship in Scandinavia often rested on fragile alliances between chieftains and local magnates, but as settlements grew in scale, kings could draw on wider resources to consolidate authority.
Leadership in Settlements
Leadership was exercised not only through the king but also via local jarls (nobles) and community leaders. Settlements gave these figures greater scope for influence:
Control over farmland provided stable revenues.
Trade centres, such as York, strengthened economic and political clout.
Settlement networks extended loyalty beyond kinship, binding people under emerging royal structures.
This local and regional leadership was crucial in sustaining kingship across disparate territories.
The Impact of Settlements on Livelihood
Farming and Land Use
Agriculture formed the backbone of settlement livelihoods. As Viking groups established themselves in fertile regions of England and elsewhere, they adapted traditional Scandinavian methods to local conditions. Improved use of the plough, crop rotation, and exploitation of pasture supported population growth.
Expansion of arable land supported surplus production.
Settlement stability encouraged more intensive farming.
Kings relied on this surplus for taxation and provisioning armies.
The farming economy thus underpinned the wealth that enabled royal power and strengthened community life.
Craft-Working and Specialisation
Settlements stimulated growth in craft-working. This included metalworking, textile production, and shipbuilding. Craft-workers often clustered in towns, producing both for local needs and long-distance trade. Royal patronage and protection encouraged such activities, as kings understood that controlling centres of production enhanced their prestige and revenue.
Craft-working: The specialised production of goods such as tools, weapons, jewellery, and textiles within Viking and Anglo-Saxon settlements, often conducted by skilled artisans.
Settlements like York became hubs for artisanal production, creating goods that circulated within the Danelaw and beyond.
Trade and Commercial Expansion
Trade flourished as settlements became integrated into broader economic systems. Viking trade connected England, Scandinavia, and the wider European world, including the Carolingian Empire and Byzantium.
Markets grew in settlements where merchants exchanged goods.
Coinage, such as the use of silver pennies, facilitated trade.
Obverse of a silver penny of King Æthelstan (r. 924–939). Such coinage underpinned market exchange and royal revenue, reinforcing royal authority through minting and taxation. Source
Kings benefitted by taxing markets and minting coins, bolstering authority.
Trade was therefore not merely economic but also political, tying settlement prosperity to the success of kingship.
Towards a United English Kingdom
Viking and Anglo-Saxon Interaction
The presence of Viking settlements in England, especially within the Danelaw, created both tension and integration.
A labelled map of England c. 910 CE showing the Danelaw and surrounding Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. It illustrates how Viking settlements shaped politics and royal leadership, though some extra regional detail is included. Source
While kingship in Anglo-Saxon areas initially struggled under the pressure of Viking incursions, settlement brought stability that altered power dynamics.
Viking rulers established political authority in their territories.
Anglo-Saxon kings, particularly Alfred and his successors, adapted strategies to resist and assimilate Viking-settled areas.
The eventual unification of England relied on reconciling Viking settlers with existing Anglo-Saxon structures.
This interplay between settlement leadership and kingship contributed directly to the emergence of a stronger, centralised English monarchy.
Key Figures in Leadership
Prominent rulers shaped the settlement landscape:
King Alfred of Wessex: Defended Anglo-Saxon territory, encouraged fortified burhs, and laid groundwork for later unification.
Map of Alfred’s fortified burhs from the 10th-century Burghal Hidage. These burhs served as both defensive and administrative centres, demonstrating royal leadership in settlement organisation. Source
King Edward the Elder and Athelstan: Consolidated Anglo-Saxon power, bringing Viking-settled regions under control.
Viking leaders such as Halfdan Ragnarsson and Guthrum: Oversaw Viking settlement in England, influencing both livelihood and local governance.
These figures illustrate the duality of Viking settlement leadership—expansion through conquest and integration through adaptation.
Settlement and the Path to Unity
The gradual move towards a united English kingdom was accelerated by the realities of Viking settlement. The need for coordinated defence, the absorption of new communities, and the political challenge of ruling mixed populations pushed Anglo-Saxon kings towards centralisation.
Kingship evolved into a more structured and bureaucratic institution.
Settlement prosperity reinforced the capacity of rulers to govern effectively.
The blending of Viking and Anglo-Saxon traditions enriched the cultural and political fabric of England.
The Role of Leadership in Transition
Leadership in settlement contexts was multifaceted. It was exercised through kings, nobles, local leaders, and economic elites. The settlements provided the resources and social frameworks that allowed rulers to consolidate authority and pursue greater ambitions. This process connected livelihood—through farming, craft-working, and trade—to the higher politics of kingship and national unity.
FAQ
Viking settlements introduced Scandinavian traditions of law and governance into England. Local assemblies, or things, influenced decision-making, justice, and land disputes.
In some regions, these practices merged with Anglo-Saxon structures, leading to hybrid systems of local rule. This helped form a distinctive political culture in the Danelaw, while also pushing Anglo-Saxon kings to adapt their own governance methods.
York, known as Jórvík, became a major centre for Viking political, economic, and cultural activity.
It served as the capital of Viking Northumbria.
Its location made it ideal for river trade routes across England and the North Sea.
Archaeological evidence shows thriving craft-working industries, including metalwork and textiles.
York’s prominence gave Viking leaders authority and challenged Anglo-Saxon kingship until it was absorbed into a united kingdom.
Evidence suggests Viking women in settlements had more visibility in economic and domestic roles than their Anglo-Saxon counterparts.
They engaged in textile production, farming management, and occasionally in trade. Grave goods found in female burials at settlement sites also hint at status and wealth within the community.
This contrasts with Anglo-Saxon norms, highlighting cultural differences brought into English society.
Settlements placed Vikings in direct contact with Christian communities. Missionaries targeted these areas to convert leaders, knowing their authority influenced entire populations.
Key agreements, such as Guthrum’s baptism after peace with Alfred, tied settlement to religious change. Churches and monasteries were rebuilt or repurposed in Viking towns, embedding Christianity gradually into daily life.
Settlements created shared markets where goods, coins, and ideas circulated between populations.
Anglo-Saxons adopted some Scandinavian weights and measures.
Viking silver hoards show active participation in English currency systems.
Trade in agricultural surplus and craft goods benefitted both communities.
This integration blurred cultural divides and laid economic foundations for later English unity.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
Identify two ways in which Viking settlements influenced Anglo-Saxon kingship in England.
Mark scheme:
1 mark for each correct identification, up to a maximum of 2 marks.
Acceptable answers include:Provided kings with access to agricultural surplus for taxation.
Created trade centres (e.g., York) that increased royal revenue and authority.
Forced Anglo-Saxon kings to adapt military and administrative strategies (e.g., Alfred’s burhs).
Brought political challenges that pushed kingship towards centralisation and unification.
Question 2 (6 marks)
Explain how the development of Viking settlements affected livelihood in England.
Mark scheme:
Level 1 (1–2 marks): General or limited description with little reference to livelihood. Example: "Farming changed in settlements."
Level 2 (3–4 marks): Some explanation of specific livelihood aspects, but coverage may be uneven. Example: "Farming became more intensive and trade grew in towns, which gave kings more resources."
Level 3 (5–6 marks): Clear, well-developed explanation covering at least two different aspects of livelihood (e.g., farming, craft-working, trade). Must demonstrate explicit connection between settlements and changes in everyday life. Example: "Farming expanded with better land use, producing surpluses that kings could tax. Craft-working also developed in towns like York, creating goods for trade and supporting economic growth."
_obverse.jpg){kind=link}
