OCR Specification focus:
‘Describe radioactive decay as spontaneous and random; define activity conceptually.’
Radioactive decay lies at the heart of nuclear physics and underpins many natural and technological processes. Understanding its random and spontaneous nature helps explain why nuclei transform unpredictably yet follow statistical patterns.
The Nature of Radioactive Decay
Radioactive materials consist of unstable nuclei that transform into more stable forms by emitting radiation. The subsubtopic focuses on the key idea that radioactive decay is both random and spontaneous, concepts that describe how and why individual nuclei undergo nuclear change.
Randomness in Nuclear Decay
Radioactive decay is described as random, meaning it is fundamentally unpredictable when observing any single nucleus.
Random decay: A process in which it is impossible to predict when any particular unstable nucleus will decay.
Although no single nucleus behaves predictably, large numbers of identical nuclei form a predictable pattern of decay over time. This allows radioactive samples to follow smooth exponential trends when measured experimentally. Between many decays, the randomness averages out, producing consistent statistical behaviour, even though every individual event is unpredictable.
Key features of randomness in radioactive decay include:
• Each nucleus has the same probability of decaying in a given time interval.
• This probability does not depend on the nucleus’s age; an undecayed nucleus is not “getting closer” to decay.
• Decay events occur independently of one another; one nucleus decaying does not influence another.
Spontaneity of Nuclear Transformations
Radioactive decay is also considered spontaneous, which refers to the absence of any external trigger required for decay to occur.
Spontaneous decay: A process in which an unstable nucleus decays without being influenced by external factors such as temperature, pressure, or chemical state.
A normal sentence must appear here to separate definition-style blocks, ensuring clarity and continuity within the text.
Spontaneity underscores that decay comes from internal nuclear instability. The forces and energy balances inside the nucleus determine whether the nucleus will eventually decay, but the exact moment remains beyond prediction. Students should appreciate that no physical, chemical, or environmental changes can speed up or slow down nuclear decay, which sets it apart from many other natural processes.
Nuclear Stability and Underlying Causes
Unstable nuclei contain an imbalance of neutrons and protons or possess an arrangement of nucleons that makes the nucleus energetically unfavourable. This instability leads to emission of α, β, or γ radiation, depending on the type of decay. Although this subsubtopic does not require detailed treatment of decay modes, recognising that decay results from internal nuclear configuration helps explain both its spontaneity and its insensitivity to external influences.
Radioactive decay in macroscopic samples appears smooth and predictable because statistical laws govern large numbers of nuclei. This is significant for practical applications ranging from nuclear medicine to archaeology.
Activity as a Measure of Decay
A crucial conceptual quantity in radioactive physics is activity, which measures the rate at which nuclei decay.
Activity (A): The number of nuclear decays occurring per second in a radioactive sample; measured in becquerels (Bq).
Activity provides a macroscopic way to describe how “active” a sample is and how quickly it is losing unstable nuclei. Even though decay events are individually random, the activity typically decreases smoothly over time for large samples.
A typical radioactive sample may contain thousands or millions of nuclei. Because of this, the number of decays per second becomes stable enough to measure. The activity is determined by two factors:
• the number of undecayed nuclei present
• the decay constant, which quantifies the probability per unit time that each nucleus decays
Although the decay constant is relevant to later subsubtopics, understanding that activity arises from the statistical behaviour of many random and spontaneous events helps make sense of why it is a predictable, measurable quantity.
Observing Random and Spontaneous Decay in Experiments
Students can observe the key characteristics of radioactive decay in simple laboratory investigations using Geiger–Müller tubes or other detectors.

Schematic of a Geiger–Müller counter showing the tube, high-voltage supply, and pulse readout. Each pulse corresponds to an individual decay event, demonstrating the random, independent nature of radioactive emissions. Source.
These experiments reveal fluctuations in short-term count rates. Such fluctuations are evidence of randomness: no two consecutive measurements produce identical results, yet the long-term average remains stable.

Graph showing the Poisson probability distribution for the number of decays from a 1 Bq Cs-137 source in a fixed 10-second interval, illustrating how individual decay counts vary randomly while clustering around a stable mean. Source.
Important features when observing decay experimentally include:
• Readings fluctuate due to the random nature of decay events.
• Longer counting intervals give smoother averages.
• Background radiation should be measured and subtracted.
• The decay process continues regardless of environmental changes, demonstrating spontaneity.
These observations reinforce the theoretical description and align precisely with the specification requirement to describe radioactive decay as spontaneous and random.
Statistical Behaviour of Nuclear Decay
Even though individual events are unpredictable, decay processes obey statistical laws at large scales. The probability of decay per unit time is constant for a given nuclide, which leads to exponential patterns in later topics such as half-life and decay equations. For this subsubtopic, students only need to recognise the conceptual reasoning:
• Randomness explains why individual events fluctuate.
• Spontaneity explains why decay cannot be controlled externally.
• Constant probability leads to stable statistical behaviour across many nuclei.
This interplay between microscopic unpredictability and macroscopic regularity is central to understanding radioactive decay and forms the basis for more advanced concepts in subsequent sections of the syllabus.
FAQ
The evidence comes from decades of precise measurements showing that even with highly stable detection equipment, the timing of individual decay events cannot be correlated with any measurable physical parameter.
Researchers have attempted to link decay times to environmental or internal nuclear factors, but no variable has ever been found that influences the moment a particular nucleus decays.
The consistent match between experimental data and the mathematical Poisson distribution strongly supports the conclusion that unpredictability is fundamental, not a limitation of equipment.
Radioactive decay depends only on the internal nuclear structure and energy configuration, which remain unchanged while the nucleus is stable.
This leads to a constant decay probability per unit time because the nucleus does not “wear out” or accumulate internal changes as time passes.
• A freshly created unstable nucleus and one that has existed for years have exactly the same chance of decaying in the next moment.
• This behaviour contrasts sharply with many macroscopic processes, such as material fatigue.
Instability usually arises from an imbalance between the number of neutrons and protons or from nucleon arrangements that give the nucleus excess energy.
Nucleons experience two competing forces: electrostatic repulsion between protons and the attractive strong nuclear force. When this balance is unfavourable, the nucleus exists in a higher-energy state.
Spontaneous decay occurs because the nucleus can reach a more stable configuration by emitting radiation or particles, releasing energy in the process.
Small samples contain fewer unstable nuclei, so statistical fluctuations become more pronounced. Each decay event represents a larger fraction of the total activity.
As a result:
• Short-term variations are larger relative to the mean.
• Graphs of count rate appear “noisier” compared with larger samples.
• Longer counting intervals are needed to obtain reliable averages.
This heightened variability reflects the inherent randomness of decay rather than any flaw in the measurement method.
Background radiation introduces additional random counts that are unrelated to the source being investigated.
To account for this:
• A background count is measured separately under identical conditions.
• This value is subtracted from each experimental reading.
• Longer counting periods help reduce the effect of random background fluctuations.
If background radiation is not removed, the pattern of randomness may appear distorted, making the decay statistics of the source harder to interpret accurately.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
Explain what is meant by radioactive decay being described as random and spontaneous.
Mark scheme:
• Random: impossible to predict when any individual unstable nucleus will decay. (1)
• Spontaneous: decay is unaffected by external conditions such as temperature, pressure, or chemical state. (1)
Question 2 (5 marks)
A student uses a Geiger–Müller tube to investigate the behaviour of a radioactive source over a series of identical 10-second intervals.
(a) Describe how the results from such an experiment provide evidence that radioactive decay is random.
(b) Explain why, despite random fluctuations in individual readings, the overall activity of the source decreases in a predictable way over time.
Mark scheme:
(a)
• Successive count readings vary even though conditions are unchanged. (1)
• Variation shows individual decay events are unpredictable and occur independently. (1)
(b)
• Large numbers of nuclei produce statistically smooth behaviour when averaged over time. (1)
• The probability per unit time that a nucleus decays remains constant for a given isotope. (1)
• Therefore the overall activity decreases in a predictable, regular pattern as the number of undecayed nuclei falls. (1)
