TutorChase logo
Login
AP Calculus AB study notes

5.7.3 Relating concavity and local extrema

AP Syllabus focus:
‘The Second Derivative Test connects concavity to extrema: local minima occur where the graph is concave up, and local maxima occur where the graph is concave down near the critical point.’

Understanding how concavity influences the classification of local extrema is essential in calculus, because it links geometric shape, derivative behavior, and the Second Derivative Test in a unified way.

Concavity as a Tool for Classifying Extrema

Concavity describes how a graph bends, and it plays a key role in determining whether a critical point corresponds to a local maximum, local minimum, or neither. The AP Calculus AB specification emphasizes that local minima appear in regions where the function is concave up, while local maxima appear where the function is concave down. This connection forms the core of the Second Derivative Test and is a powerful tool when the first derivative alone does not immediately reveal the function’s local behavior.

Pasted image

Graph of a cubic function f(x)=3x35x2+8f(x)=3x^{3}-5x^{2}+8 with local maximum, local minimum, and an inflection point labeled, accompanied by graphs of f(x)f'(x) and f(x)f''(x). The sign of f(x)f''(x) illustrates where the graph is concave up or concave down, showing why concave-up regions produce local minima and concave-down regions produce local maxima. The inflection point is additional detail beyond this subsubtopic but reinforces how changing concavity relates to extrema. Source.

Definition of Concavity

Concavity: The tendency of a graph to bend upward (concave up) or downward (concave down), determined by the sign of the second derivative.

A sentence explaining: Concavity provides geometric insight, allowing us to interpret how the slopes of tangent lines change around a point of interest.

Interpreting Concave Up and Concave Down Behavior

The sign of the second derivative reflects how the first derivative changes and how the function curves. When the graph is concave up, the function resembles a “cup” that opens upward; when concave down, it resembles a cap or an inverted bowl.

f''(x) > 0
f(x) f''(x) = The second derivative, indicating the direction of concavity

Concave down behavior requires a separate statement, but this description should not immediately follow the equation block.

When the second derivative is negative over an interval, the graph bends downward, meaning slopes are decreasing as x increases.

How Concavity Predicts Local Extrema

The Second Derivative Test relies on evaluating the sign of f(x)f''(x) at a critical point—a point where the first derivative is zero or undefined. Concavity determines whether the point represents a maximum or minimum, based on the nature of the curve around it. This relationship comes directly from the AP specification for this subsubtopic, which states that concave-up regions produce local minima, while concave-down regions produce local maxima near the critical point.

Critical Point: A point where f(x)=0f'(x)=0 or where f(x)f'(x) does not exist, provided the function is defined at that x-value.

The meaning of this definition is crucial because the Second Derivative Test only applies at these critical points, not at arbitrary points on the graph.

Using the Second Derivative Test to Classify Extrema Through Concavity

The Second Derivative Test offers a structured way to determine whether a critical point is a local maximum, a local minimum, or inconclusive.

• At a critical point where f(c)=0f'(c)=0, evaluate f(c)f''(c) to determine concavity.
• If f''(c)>0, the function is concave up at x = c, and the point corresponds to a local minimum.
• If f''(c)<0, the function is concave down at x = c, resulting in a local maximum.
• If f(c)=0f''(c)=0 or does not exist, the Second Derivative Test does not provide a conclusion about local extrema.

These statements illustrate why concavity is central: it informs how slopes behave on each side of the point.

Pasted image

Graph of f(x)=sin(x)exp(x/5)f(x)=\sin(x)\exp(-|x/5|) with clearly marked local and global maxima and minima. The labeled peaks and valleys highlight where extrema occur and naturally suggest how concavity near each point determines whether it is a maximum or minimum. The distinction between local and global extrema is an additional detail but reinforces precise terminology about extrema. Source.

Geometric Interpretation of the Relationship

Concavity gives a visual interpretation of the Second Derivative Test. Because concave-up graphs open upward, the tangent line at the bottommost point will have zero slope and represent the lowest point locally. Likewise, concave-down graphs open downward, so the tangent line at the topmost point exhibits a local maximum. This geometric view reinforces the specification statement about maxima and minima emerging from concavity patterns.

Limitations Implied by Concavity and the Second Derivative

The Second Derivative Test does not always yield a definitive classification. Even if concavity information is incomplete—such as when f(c)=0f''(c)=0—a critical point still exists, but other methods like the First Derivative Test must be used. Concavity remains essential, yet its absence or ambiguity requires shifting strategies.

Why Concavity–Extrema Relationships Matter in Analysis

Connecting concavity to local extrema deepens a student's conceptual understanding of how differential information governs the shape of a function. It highlights that extrema are not isolated algebraic conditions but are tied to how a function curves in its neighborhood. The AP Calculus AB curriculum stresses this relationship so students can analyze graphs, justify behaviors clearly, and understand how derivative tests work together to describe the function’s structure.

FAQ

The Second Derivative Test focuses on concavity at a single point, allowing a classification without examining behaviour on both sides of the critical point.

In contrast, checking the sign of the first derivative requires analysing intervals around the point.
It is more reliable in ambiguous cases, but also more labour-intensive because it demands constructing sign charts or considering directional changes.

Yes. Concavity indicates how quickly slopes change near a critical point.

• A strongly concave-up region suggests that slopes increase rapidly, creating a sharper local minimum.
• A strongly concave-down region suggests slopes decrease rapidly, producing a steeper local maximum.

The magnitude of the second derivative helps describe how pronounced the extremum is, even though this is not required for classification.

If concavity changes at the critical point, the Second Derivative Test may fail because the second derivative could be zero or undefined there.

In this situation, a point of inflection may exist, but it does not guarantee an extremum.
The first derivative’s sign change becomes the decisive way to determine the behaviour.

In a concave-up region, slopes increase as you move through the critical point.
Before the point, slopes are negative or less positive; after the point, slopes are more positive.
This produces a lowest point because the derivative moves from smaller values to larger ones as x increases.

The geometric shape (a “cup”) visually confirms this behaviour.

Yes, but the Second Derivative Test cannot be used in this situation.

A local extremum may appear at a sharp turn or cusp where the derivative is zero or undefined.
Here, concavity cannot be determined from the second derivative, so the first derivative’s sign change or geometric reasoning must be used instead.

Practice Questions

Question 1 (1–3 marks)
A function f has a critical point at x = 2 where f'(2) = 0. It is known that f''(2) is positive.
(a) State whether f has a local maximum, a local minimum, or neither at x = 2.
(b) Explain briefly how concavity justifies your answer.

Question 1 (3 marks)

(a) 1 mark
• Correct identification that f has a local minimum at x = 2.

(b) 2 marks
• 1 mark for stating that f''(2) > 0 means the function is concave up at x = 2.
• 1 mark for explaining that a concave-up shape indicates the point lies at the bottom of a “cup”, giving a local minimum.

Question 2 (4–6 marks)
A differentiable function g has a critical point at x = –1 where g'(–1) = 0. The second derivative is given by g''(x) = 3x + 6.
(a) Determine the concavity of g at x = –1.
(b) Using the concavity, determine whether g has a local maximum, a local minimum, or neither at x = –1.
(c) Explain in detail how the relationship between concavity and local extrema supports your conclusion.

Question 2 (6 marks)

(a) 2 marks
• 1 mark for correctly substituting x = –1 into g''(x).
• 1 mark for concluding that g''(–1) is positive, meaning the function is concave up at x = –1.

(b) 2 marks
• 1 mark for correctly identifying that g has a local minimum at x = –1.
• 1 mark for linking this to the concave-up shape.

(c) 2 marks
• 1 mark for describing that concave-up behaviour causes slopes to increase through the point, producing a local minimum.
• 1 mark for showing clear understanding that the Second Derivative Test connects the sign of g'' to the nature of the extremum.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email