TutorChase logo
IB DP Economics Study Notes

2.7.1 Price Controls

Price controls are mechanisms used by governments to regulate the prices of essential goods and services in the market. These controls can either be set above or below the equilibrium price, resulting in price ceilings or price floors, respectively. The primary objective of these controls is to ensure affordability, fairness, and to prevent exploitation. However, they can also lead to unintended consequences. Understanding the impact of price controls on market outcomes necessitates a comprehension of externalities and welfare loss.

Price Ceilings

A price ceiling is a maximum allowable price set by the government for a particular good or service. This means that sellers cannot charge more than this stipulated price. They are typically set below the equilibrium price to make certain essential goods and services more affordable for consumers.

A graph of price ceiling

A graph illustrating an effective price ceiling.

Image courtesy of economicsonline

Effects of Price Ceilings:

  • Shortages: When the price is artificially set below the equilibrium, the quantity demanded often exceeds the quantity supplied. This is because at a lower price, consumers demand more, while producers are less willing to supply the product.
  • Decreased Producer Surplus: With a reduced price, producers might find it unprofitable to produce the same quantity as before. If the price set is below their cost of production, they might even incur losses.
  • Increased Consumer Surplus: Initially, consumers benefit from the lower price. However, this advantage is short-lived if they cannot obtain the product due to shortages.
  • Reduced Quality: Producers might reduce the quality of the product to cut costs and maintain profitability.
  • Wastage: In their rush to buy the product at a lower price, consumers might purchase more than they need, leading to potential wastage.

The implementation of price ceilings can often lead to government and market failures, highlighting the challenges in achieving the intended economic outcomes.

Price Floors

Price floors are the opposite of price ceilings. They are minimum prices set by the government, usually above the equilibrium price. They are often used to ensure that the market price of a good or service does not fall below a level that would threaten the livelihood of producers.

A graph of price floor

A graph illustrating an effective price floor.

Image courtesy of economicsonline

Effects of Price Floors:

  • Surpluses: When the price is artificially set above the equilibrium, the quantity supplied often exceeds the quantity demanded. Producers are willing to supply more at the higher price, but consumers demand less.
  • Decreased Consumer Surplus: Consumers have to pay a higher price, reducing their surplus or benefit.
  • Increased Producer Surplus: Producers benefit from the higher price, but this is contingent on them being able to sell their goods or services.
  • Inefficient Allocation of Resources: Resources might be wasted producing goods that are not in high demand.
  • Storage and Wastage Issues: Unsold goods might need to be stored, leading to additional costs. If these goods are perishable, they might go to waste.

Price floors can necessitate interventions such as subsidies to support producers in sectors where the market price is deemed too low for sustainability.

IB Economics Tutor Tip: Understanding price controls requires recognising their dual impact: they aim to promote fairness and affordability, but can also lead to inefficiencies and unintended consequences in the market.


Rationing becomes necessary when there's a shortage due to a price ceiling. Since not everyone can obtain the product at the controlled price, a system to distribute the limited quantity becomes essential. This system's effectiveness is crucial for mitigating the negative externalities of consumption.

A flowchart of rationing

A flowchart illustrating rationing.

Image courtesy of wallstreetmojo

Methods of Rationing:

  • First-come, first-served: This is the most straightforward method where products are sold to those who arrive first. However, it can lead to long queues and inefficiencies.
  • Favouritism: Sellers might choose to sell to friends, family, or those they favour. This method is often seen as unfair.
  • Lottery: Buyers are chosen at random. While this is fairer than favouritism, it's still left to chance.
  • Criteria-based: Allocation based on certain criteria like age, need, or occupation. For instance, during a food shortage, children and the elderly might be prioritised.

Black Markets

Black markets emerge when official channels become restrictive or inefficient. When price controls, especially price ceilings, are in place, black markets can become prevalent. These markets further complicate the definition of externalities in economic analysis.

A chart of indian black market

Image courtesy of fundefined

Characteristics of Black Markets:

  • Higher Prices: Goods in black markets often sell at prices much higher than the official price ceilings, reflecting their true market value or even higher due to the risk associated with illegal transactions.
  • Illegal Transactions: Engaging in black market activities is illegal, and participants can face severe penalties.
  • Quality Uncertainty: Without regulations and oversight, there's no guarantee about the quality or authenticity of goods.
  • No Legal Recourse: If a buyer is cheated or sold a faulty product, they can't seek legal redress.

Reasons for the Emergence of Black Markets:

  • Shortages: When official markets can't meet demand due to price ceilings, consumers look elsewhere, even if it means paying a higher price.
  • Profit Motive: The potential for higher profits drives sellers to the black market, especially when official prices are unprofitably low.
  • Restrictive Regulations: Overly restrictive regulations or bureaucracy can also drive both buyers and sellers to the black market.

The role of taxation in managing market outcomes is also a critical aspect to consider in the context of price controls and their broader economic implications.

IB Tutor Advice: For exam success, illustrate your answers with diagrams showing price ceilings and floors, and explain their effects on supply, demand, and market equilibrium to demonstrate comprehensive understanding.

In understanding price controls, it's crucial to recognise that while they are implemented with the best intentions, they often come with a set of challenges. Balancing the needs and welfare of both consumers and producers is a complex task, and price controls are just one tool in the vast arsenal of economic policy.


Price controls can significantly influence producers' decisions. If there's a price ceiling set below the equilibrium price, potential new entrants might be discouraged from entering the market as the controlled price might not cover their costs or allow for a reasonable profit. On the other hand, a price floor set above the equilibrium can attract new entrants as they see an opportunity for higher profits. However, if the price floor leads to significant surpluses, these new entrants might struggle to sell their products. Existing producers might also decide to exit the market if a price ceiling makes their operations unprofitable or if a price floor results in unsold stock and increased storage costs.

Price controls directly impact consumer and producer surplus. A price ceiling, set below the equilibrium price, increases consumer surplus as consumers benefit from the lower price. However, producer surplus decreases because producers receive a lower price than what they would in a free market. Conversely, a price floor, set above the equilibrium price, decreases consumer surplus as they have to pay a higher price, but increases producer surplus as producers benefit from the higher price. However, it's essential to note that these surpluses are theoretical maximums. In reality, due to inefficiencies like shortages or surpluses caused by price controls, the actual surpluses might be lower.

Yes, price controls are more common for goods deemed essential or of strategic importance. This includes basic food items, fuel, medicines, and utilities like water and electricity. Governments often intervene to ensure that these goods and services remain affordable to the general population, preventing exploitation by producers and ensuring social welfare. For instance, during economic crises or natural disasters, governments might implement price ceilings on essential items to prevent price gouging. Similarly, price floors might be set for agricultural products to ensure farmers receive a minimum income and to maintain food security.

The decision to set a specific level for a price ceiling or floor is complex and depends on various factors. Governments often consider the cost of production, ensuring that producers can at least cover their costs. They also look at historical prices, inflation rates, and international price benchmarks (if the product is traded globally). Additionally, socio-economic factors play a role; for instance, governments might set prices to ensure affordability for the most vulnerable sections of the population. Feedback from stakeholders, including producers, consumers, and experts, is also taken into account. However, it's worth noting that these decisions can sometimes be influenced by political considerations and lobbying by interest groups.

Governments might choose not to intervene with price controls for several reasons. Firstly, they might believe in the efficiency of the free market to self-correct over time. In a free market, high prices can attract new suppliers, increasing supply and pushing prices down, while low prices can reduce supply, pushing prices up. Secondly, governments might be wary of the unintended consequences of price controls, such as black markets, reduced product quality, or misallocation of resources. Additionally, implementing and monitoring price controls can be administratively challenging and costly. Lastly, there might be political reasons, such as lobbying by interest groups, that influence a government's decision not to intervene.

Practice Questions

Explain the potential consequences of implementing a price ceiling below the equilibrium price in a market.

When a price ceiling is set below the equilibrium price, it can lead to several consequences. Firstly, there's likely to be a shortage as the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied at the lower price. This is because consumers demand more of the product at the reduced price, while producers might be less willing or unable to supply the product at this price, especially if it doesn't cover their costs. Additionally, this can lead to a decrease in producer surplus as they might produce less or even incur losses. On the consumer side, while there's an initial increase in consumer surplus due to the lower price, this benefit might be short-lived if they can't obtain the product due to the aforementioned shortages. Over time, this can also lead to the emergence of black markets where the product is sold at higher prices, and the quality of goods might decrease as producers look for ways to cut costs.

How can black markets emerge as a result of price controls, and what are the potential risks associated with them?

Black markets can emerge as a result of price controls, especially when there are price ceilings that create shortages in the official market. When the demand in the official market isn't met due to these shortages, consumers might turn to alternative, often illegal, sources to obtain the product, even if it means paying a higher price. Sellers in the black market can charge these higher prices because they are supplying goods that are scarce in the official market. However, black markets come with several risks. Firstly, transactions in black markets are illegal, and participants can face legal consequences. Secondly, there's often uncertainty about the quality or authenticity of goods in black markets since they aren't regulated. Moreover, if a buyer is cheated or sold a faulty product, they have no legal recourse. This can lead to a loss of trust in the market system and can have broader implications for the economy.

Dave avatar
Written by: Dave
Cambridge University - BA Hons Economics

Dave is a Cambridge Economics graduate with over 8 years of tutoring expertise in Economics & Business Studies. He crafts resources for A-Level, IB, & GCSE and excels at enhancing students' understanding & confidence in these subjects.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2 About yourself
Still have questions?
Let's get in touch.