OCR Specification focus:
‘Make reasonable estimates of physical quantities listed in this specification.’
Being able to make sensible estimates allows physicists to quickly evaluate whether an answer or measurement is reasonable, ensuring calculations and models align with real-world expectations and constraints.
Estimation in Physics
Making sensible estimates is a vital scientific skill. It involves using approximate but reasonable values for physical quantities to check the plausibility of results or to plan experiments. Estimates are not guesses made without thought; they rely on experience, known facts, and logical reasoning.
Estimation encourages quantitative intuition, helping physicists develop an instinct for what values are realistic. For example, estimating the mass of an apple or the power output of a kettle gives a sense of scale across different phenomena.
The Purpose of Estimation
Estimations help to:
Check results — determine if a calculated value is physically realistic.
Simplify complex problems — remove unnecessary precision to focus on key relationships.
Plan experiments — decide appropriate measurement ranges and instrument sensitivities.
Evaluate reasonableness — assess whether data or theory align with known magnitudes.
When faced with new situations, scientists use prior knowledge to produce quick, credible values. This prevents errors from unrealistic assumptions or calculation mistakes.
What Makes an Estimate “Sensible”?
A sensible estimate is one that:
Falls within a realistic range based on physical experience.
Considers relevant contextual factors (e.g., temperature, size, time).
Uses rounded, manageable figures suitable for approximate reasoning.
Reflects awareness of order of magnitude — the power of ten closest to the quantity’s value.
Order of Magnitude: The scale of size or quantity expressed as a power of ten, used to compare approximate magnitudes.
Between different phenomena, order of magnitude helps to classify whether two quantities are of a similar scale or vastly different. For instance, the radius of the Earth (~10⁶ m) is about seven orders of magnitude larger than that of a football (~10⁻¹ m).
An order of magnitude is the nearest power of ten to a quantity and is the natural scale for rough comparisons.

A concise visual comparing successive orders of magnitude on a logarithmic number line. This helps you judge whether an estimate is within a factor of ten. The diagram is intentionally minimal to focus on the powers of ten used in quick, sensible estimates. Source.
Developing a Framework for Estimation
When approaching an estimation task, follow these steps:
Identify what is being estimated.
Clarify the target quantity and its physical meaning.Recall related quantities.
Consider quantities you already know that can help infer the unknown (e.g., density, time, distance).Choose a suitable model or relationship.
Select a simple equation or proportionality that links known and unknown variables.Assign reasonable approximate values.
Use everyday knowledge or typical data to fill in missing quantities.Perform a quick calculation.
Keep the arithmetic simple, rounding appropriately to maintain clarity.Check for reasonableness.
Compare your result with expected scales or known physical limits.
Everyday Estimation Skills
Physicists constantly use estimation, often subconsciously. For example:
Estimating walking speed as about 1.5 m s⁻¹.
Taking air density as approximately 1.2 kg m⁻³ near the surface of the Earth.
Assuming acceleration due to gravity as 9.8 m s⁻² (commonly approximated to 10 m s⁻² in rough calculations).
Such approximate values support quick reasoning and mental validation of results.
Common Quantities Worth Estimating
Being familiar with key physical quantities from everyday contexts aids rapid estimation. Some examples include:
Length:
Human height ≈ 1.7 m
Door width ≈ 1 m
Car length ≈ 4 mTime:
Heartbeat interval ≈ 1 s
One hour ≈ 3.6 × 10³ sMass:
Apple ≈ 0.2 kg
Adult human ≈ 70 kgSpeed:
Walking ≈ 1.5 m s⁻¹
Sound in air ≈ 340 m s⁻¹Energy:
Light bulb ≈ 60 W
Car engine ≈ 50 kW
Having a mental “database” of these typical values is invaluable in exam and practical contexts.
When estimating time-scales, thinking on a logarithmic axis helps: seconds, minutes, hours, days, and years differ by powers of ten.

A horizontal logarithmic time scale showing standard units from milliseconds to years. Reading time on a log axis reinforces order-of-magnitude thinking used in sensible estimates. The diagram includes average month duration; this extra calendar detail is not required by the syllabus but does not distract from the core idea. Source.
Dealing with Assumptions
Estimates often rely on simplifying assumptions. These make problems manageable while preserving essential physics.
For example, when estimating the time for an object to fall, air resistance may be ignored to obtain a quick approximation.
When stating estimates:
Declare the assumptions used (e.g., constant speed, uniform density).
Understand their impact on the result’s accuracy.
Recognise that assumptions may introduce systematic bias, but are acceptable when acknowledged.
The Role of Units and Significant Figures
Maintaining correct S.I. units ensures clarity and comparability between estimates. All quantities must be expressed in consistent units — for instance, metres (m), seconds (s), kilograms (kg), and joules (J).
Significant figures communicate the precision of an estimate. For estimation purposes:
Use typically one or two significant figures.
Avoid unnecessary precision — it gives a false sense of accuracy.
Always include a unit, even for rough values.
Linking Estimation to Uncertainties
Every estimate inherently contains an uncertainty range, representing the possible deviation from the actual value. Recognising uncertainty reinforces realistic thinking. For example, estimating a car’s mass as 1 × 10³ kg ± 20% acknowledges variation among models.
Quantifying uncertainty distinguishes reasonable estimation from vague guessing and connects directly to experimental analysis in later topics.
Common Pitfalls in Estimation
To make effective estimates, students should avoid:
Ignoring unit consistency (e.g., mixing centimetres with metres).
Overestimating precision or quoting too many significant figures.
Using unfamiliar or unrealistic quantities without justification.
Failing to consider environmental context (e.g., density of air at altitude).
Developing good habits through consistent practice strengthens both conceptual understanding and exam performance.
Building Intuition through Comparison
Comparative reasoning helps solidify understanding. Estimating is more reliable when based on ratios or relative magnitudes. For example:
The mass of a car is roughly 1,000 times that of a person.
The speed of sound is around 200 times faster than walking.
Such relationships anchor abstract quantities to tangible experience, enabling students to recognise when numbers “feel wrong.”
Estimation in Experimental Physics
In laboratory work, sensible estimates are indispensable. They allow experimenters to:
Predict expected outcomes before collecting data.
Choose appropriate instrument ranges to prevent overload or zero readings.
Identify anomalies in real-time during measurement.
Interpret data meaningfully within a physical framework.
Even professional physicists begin experimental design by making order-of-magnitude predictions, which guide apparatus choice and safety checks.
FAQ
A reasonable estimate depends on context, experience, and scale. Physicists use known reference values and orders of magnitude to assess plausibility.
For instance, when estimating an object’s speed, a reasonable estimate considers physical constraints—such as typical walking or driving speeds—rather than arbitrary numbers.
Estimates should align with both physical intuition and established data ranges to be considered sensible.
Round numbers simplify mental calculations and highlight the order of magnitude rather than unnecessary precision.
Using 10 m s⁻² for gravity or 1000 kg m⁻³ for water makes relationships and comparisons easier to handle quickly.
Since estimates focus on approximate scale, rounding keeps results transparent and prevents misleading precision.
An estimate is an approximate value derived logically from known quantities, while an assumption is a simplification about the physical situation.
For example:
Estimating air density as 1.2 kg m⁻³ is an estimate.
Ignoring air resistance in a falling object is an assumption.
Both are used in modelling but serve distinct purposes—one provides a number, the other defines conditions.
Estimation allows quick comparison between measured and expected results. If the measured value differs by several orders of magnitude from a sensible estimate, an error may have occurred.
Common issues detected this way include:
Incorrect unit conversions.
Misread instrument scales.
Data entry or calculation errors.
Checking against an estimate provides an early warning before deeper analysis.
Estimation should not replace precise measurement when accuracy is critical—such as in engineering tolerances, safety limits, or scientific constants.
It’s also unsuitable when:
Small variations lead to significant effects (e.g., medical dosages).
The system’s complexity exceeds simple scaling logic.
In these cases, detailed data collection and calculation are necessary to ensure reliability and safety.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (2 marks)
Estimate the mass of air contained in an average-sized classroom measuring 8 m long, 6 m wide, and 3 m high. Assume the density of air is 1.2 kg m⁻³.
Mark scheme:
Volume of classroom = 8 × 6 × 3 = 144 m³ (1 mark)
Mass = density × volume = 1.2 × 144 = 173 kg (accept 170–180 kg as sensible range) (1 mark)
Question 2 (5 marks)
A student claims that a 60 W light bulb converts enough electrical energy in one hour to lift a 70 kg person up a height of 50 metres. Using sensible estimates, discuss whether this claim is reasonable.
Mark scheme:
Recognises that energy output of bulb = power × time = 60 × 3600 = 2.16 × 10⁵ J (1 mark)
Calculates energy required to lift person using E = mgh = 70 × 9.8 × 50 = 3.43 × 10⁴ J (1 mark)
Compares the two values and states that the bulb produces more energy than needed to lift the person (1 mark)
Notes that in practice the bulb’s efficiency is very low (only a small fraction becomes useful work) (1 mark)
Concludes that while the total electrical energy is enough in theory, it would take far longer or be impractical due to low efficiency (1 mark)
