AP Syllabus focus:
‘The United States became more connected with the world, pursued expansion in the Western Hemisphere, and became a major destination for migrants.’
From 1844 to 1877, the United States expanded its territorial reach, deepened international connections, and experienced large-scale migration that reshaped national identity, foreign relations, and continental ambitions.
Expansion, Foreign Policy, and a Changing World
Growing International Connections
During this period, the United States became increasingly integrated into global political and economic systems. American merchants, diplomats, and naval forces sought new trade routes and international visibility, reflecting a broader mid-19th-century push toward worldwide engagement. These efforts marked a shift from earlier regional focus toward a more outward-looking national strategy.
Western Hemisphere Expansion and Continental Ambitions
U.S. foreign policy increasingly prioritized the Western Hemisphere, following the ideological momentum of Manifest Destiny. This belief asserted that Americans had a providential mission to expand and spread U.S. institutions across the continent. Expansionist policymakers used diplomatic agreements, military force, and commercial negotiations to extend U.S. authority in North America.

A map of the historical territorial expansion of the United States, illustrating how successive acquisitions transformed the nation into a continental power. The shaded regions indicate major land gains through treaties, purchases, and war. Some later territorial additions appear as well, which extend beyond the period 1844–1877 but help contextualize long-term expansion patterns. Source.
Manifest Destiny: The 19th-century ideology claiming Americans were destined to expand across the continent, justified by cultural, political, and racial arguments.
American efforts aligned with long-standing hemispheric principles rooted in the Monroe Doctrine, which had warned European powers to avoid further colonization in the Americas. While the original doctrine was defensive, mid-century policymakers increasingly used it to justify assertive expansion.
After this ideological turn, U.S. actions demonstrated an eagerness to occupy and control new regions rather than merely discourage European involvement.
Diplomatic and Commercial Initiatives
American leaders pursued treaties and commercial agreements to strengthen hemispheric influence and reach Asian markets. Their approach blended security concerns, economic interests, and nationalistic motivations.
Key diplomatic and commercial initiatives included:
Trade expansion efforts, especially toward the Pacific and East Asia, driven by industrializing markets and new commercial opportunities.
Negotiations with Latin American countries to secure transit routes, prevent European re-entrenchment, and encourage mutually beneficial trade relationships.
Naval expeditions, such as those aimed at opening harbors and developing coaling stations that would support U.S. merchant and naval vessels.
Sectoral agreements, including fishing rights, border clarifications, and transit treaties that facilitated stronger hemispheric networks.
Together, these strategies increased the United States’ visibility in global affairs and solidified a more assertive diplomatic posture.
Expansion and Migration: A Changing Population Landscape
As expansion unfolded, the nation experienced substantial demographic change. The United States became a major destination for migrants from Europe and Asia, with broad effects on society, labor markets, and political debate. Migrants arrived for economic opportunity, resource access, and refuge from political upheaval or famine in their home countries.
Migrant: An individual who relocates across national boundaries or within a region to seek new economic opportunities, safety, or social conditions.
Migration accelerated settlement patterns that supported U.S. expansionist goals. Migrants supplied labor for frontier development, infrastructure projects, and urban growth, reinforcing the nation’s territorial and economic transformation.
Following this demographic surge, communities diversified and regional cultures evolved in response to new languages, beliefs, and labor systems.
Effects on U.S. Society and Foreign Policy
The United States’ deeper international connections and migration flows reshaped multiple dimensions of national life.
Economic Effects
The arrival of European and Asian migrants expanded the labor force.
New markets abroad encouraged U.S. farmers and manufacturers to increase production.
Trade networks connecting the Atlantic and Pacific created broader commercial opportunities.
Political and Diplomatic Effects
Increased U.S. involvement in global markets required stronger diplomatic relationships.
Western Hemisphere policy grew assertive as the U.S. sought to limit European influence.
International migration prompted domestic debates about citizenship, rights, and cultural identity.
Social and Cultural Effects
Ethnic communities formed in major cities and frontier settlements.
Migrants introduced new religious traditions, languages, and social customs.
Nativist anxieties began to rise as cultural and political diversity expanded.
These developments reinforced the idea that the United States was no longer insulated from global forces, but instead actively shaped and was shaped by international dynamics.
Expansion Into the West and Its Global Meaning
The pursuit of territory in the West connected domestic expansion with broader foreign policy ambitions. American leaders viewed continental control as essential to national power, economic development, and geopolitical security. As settlers moved westward, federal and military actions facilitated territorial incorporation and protected migrant routes.

This map illustrates major trade and westward migration routes during the 1840–1850 period, including canals, railroads, river routes, and key trails. It shows how transportation systems linked eastern cities to western regions, enabling both commercial exchange and frontier settlement. Some routes shown extend beyond the exact AP period focus but remain directly relevant to understanding expansion infrastructure. Source.
Processes contributing to this expansion included:
Diplomatic land acquisition, supported by negotiations and treaties.
Conflict-driven expansion, where military force advanced U.S. claims.
Population-driven settlement, as migrants and settlers moved into new regions.
Transportation improvements, linking distant territories and integrating them economically.
These dynamics emphasized the connection between domestic growth and international strategy. The United States positioned itself as an emerging power, capable of influencing hemispheric developments and pursuing transpacific commercial relationships.
The United States as a Destination for Global Migrants
By the 1850s, the United States stood out as a major global migration destination. Economic opportunity, abundant land, and political freedoms attracted millions. Migrants played an essential role in the national transformation by contributing labor, cultural vitality, and demographic growth.
Their presence also shaped foreign policy, as diplomats and policymakers considered international migration patterns, emigrant relations, and treaties with migrants’ home countries. Migration thus linked domestic politics with global currents, making the United States part of a broader network of population movement and cultural exchange.

This chart displays the long-term trends of immigration to the United States by region of origin, beginning in the early 19th century. The steep rise in European immigration during the 1800s aligns with the migration patterns described in the notes. Later data extend beyond the AP period, but the 19th-century portion directly supports understanding the demographic dimension of expansion. Source.
Overall, expansion, foreign policy shifts, and changing migration patterns transformed the national landscape, intensified global ties, and positioned the United States as an increasingly influential hemispheric and transpacific force.
FAQ
Technological improvements accelerated America’s capacity to engage globally. The telegraph enabled faster diplomatic communication, reducing delays between governments.
Steamship technology made transoceanic travel and trade more reliable. This allowed merchants to expand markets and encouraged naval forces to project power beyond the continent.
Improved printing and postal systems also helped circulate ideas about expansion and foreign policy, contributing to broader public engagement with global affairs.
Merchant groups pushed for policies that secured access to new markets, particularly in Asia and Latin America. Their lobbying helped shape commercial treaties and naval expansion.
They also influenced consular appointments abroad, ensuring American representation supported trade interests. These networks strengthened the economic rationale behind U.S. foreign engagement.
Pacific ports offered access to Asian markets, which Americans saw as essential to future economic growth. The rise of transpacific whaling, shipping, and commerce reinforced this view.
These ports also provided coaling stations for steamships, enabling longer maritime routes. Their strategic value made them central to debates over naval presence and diplomatic engagement in the Pacific Basin.
Large migrant communities transformed cities through new labour patterns, cultural customs, and religious institutions. Urban neighbourhoods often became ethnically distinct.
Politically, the influx of migrants reshaped voting blocs and party strategies. This heightened debates over identity, citizenship, and the cultural direction of the nation.
Many U.S. leaders perceived European influence as a threat to regional stability and American security. This belief encouraged more assertive enforcement of hemispheric dominance.
Key concerns included preventing new colonies, limiting intervention in Latin American affairs, and maintaining favourable trade conditions. These aims shaped diplomatic efforts and justified expansionist rhetoric.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (1–3 marks)
Explain one way in which the United States became more connected with the wider world between 1844 and 1877.
Mark scheme
Award up to 3 marks:
1 mark for identifying a valid development (e.g., increased trade with Asia, diplomatic treaties in the Western Hemisphere, naval expeditions).
1 mark for describing the development in accurate historical detail.
1 mark for explaining how this development increased the United States’ connection with the wider world (e.g., promoting international commerce, establishing new diplomatic relationships, or securing strategic ports).
Question 2 (4–6 marks)
Evaluate the extent to which expansion in the Western Hemisphere shaped United States foreign policy between 1844 and 1877.
Mark scheme
Award up to 6 marks:
1 mark for a clear argument or line of reasoning addressing the extent of the impact.
1–2 marks for accurate evidence of Western Hemisphere expansion (e.g., Manifest Destiny, territorial ambitions, Latin American diplomacy, enforcement of hemispheric influence).
1–2 marks for analysis explaining how these actions shaped foreign policy (e.g., more assertive stance against European involvement, pursuit of strategic routes, broader diplomatic engagement).
1 mark for considering the degree of impact, which may include discussion of additional factors (e.g., Pacific trade ambitions, global commercial interests).
