AP Syllabus focus:
‘Conservatives attacked liberal laws, court decisions, and perceived moral decline, seeking to limit federal power and pursue a tougher foreign policy.’
In the 1960s, a rising conservative movement challenged expanding federal authority, liberal social policies, and cultural change, reshaping American politics and laying foundations for a modern conservative ideology.
The Roots of the Conservative Turn
The conservative turn of the 1960s emerged from widespread unease with the social, political, and cultural transformations of the postwar era. Many Americans perceived rapid change—such as civil rights victories, Supreme Court decisions expanding individual liberties, and the federal government’s expanding social programs—as a threat to traditional values and local autonomy. This response coalesced into a political renewal that sought to restrain federal power and promote a more assertive Cold War stance.
Influences from the Early Cold War
Conservatives framed their arguments within the broader Cold War context. Fears of communism abroad and subversion at home helped justify demands for stronger national security and skepticism toward liberal reforms. The perception that liberal policymakers were too conciliatory toward the Soviet Union fueled calls for a more forceful foreign policy.
Key Ideological Foundations of the Conservative Movement
Anti-Liberal Backlash
Conservatives deeply opposed what they saw as excessive federal intervention in economic and social life. The New Deal and early Great Society reforms symbolized, for them, unwarranted centralized power.
Federal Power: The authority exercised by the national government over states, individuals, and economic activity.
Many conservatives argued that unchecked federal power threatened individual liberty, weakened local control, and undermined the free-market system. These criticisms gained momentum as the Supreme Court issued landmark rulings that reshaped American society.
Critiques of the Warren Court
The Warren Court, known for its activism in expanding civil liberties and rights, became a central target of conservative critique.

The Warren Court in 1965, led by Chief Justice Earl Warren, issued influential rulings expanding civil liberties. Many conservatives viewed these decisions as examples of judicial overreach. This image visually situates the justices whose actions shaped national debates over liberal legal change. Source.
Perceived Judicial Activism
Conservatives believed the Court created new rights not explicitly grounded in the Constitution.
School prayer decisions fueled claims that secularism was eroding traditional morality.
A broader cultural concern soon connected these legal developments to what many saw as moral decline.
Cultural Anxiety and the Defense of Traditional Values
The Perceived Moral Decline of the 1960s
Rapid shifts in cultural norms—reflected in youth culture, new attitudes toward sexuality, and changing gender expectations—fueled conservative warnings about weakened social cohesion.
Moral Decline: The belief that societal values are eroding due to permissive cultural or legal changes.
Many conservatives linked these changes directly to federal and judicial actions that, in their view, undermined parental authority, religious norms, and local autonomy.
A growing rhetoric emphasized restoring order, discipline, and tradition as antidotes to generational upheaval.
Religion and the Conservative Turn
Religious leaders played a key role, arguing that spiritual and moral values were foundational to national strength. Many Americans embraced conservatism through churches that rejected secular trends and advocated a return to traditional family ideals.
Conservatism and Foreign Policy in the 1960s
Advocating a Tougher Cold War Stance
Conservatives criticized what they viewed as the softness of liberal administrations toward the Soviet Union and global communism. They argued for:
Increased military spending
More aggressive containment strategies
Skepticism toward negotiations perceived as concessions
This approach appealed to Americans who believed U.S. credibility was slipping amid international crises such as the Cuban Missile Crisis and escalating conflict in Vietnam.
Barry Goldwater and the Rebirth of Conservative Politics
Senator Barry Goldwater became the political embodiment of 1960s conservatism.

Barry Goldwater symbolized the ideological direction of the conservative movement, emphasizing limited federal government and strong anti-communist policy. His 1964 campaign reshaped conservative activism despite electoral defeat. The portrait adds no content beyond his likeness and historical context. Source.
Goldwater’s message:
Federal programs threatened liberty.
Welfare expansion undermined personal responsibility.
A strong nuclear policy was essential for deterrence.
Although he lost in a landslide, his campaign mobilized grassroots conservatives, especially in the Sun Belt, reshaping the Republican Party.

This Electoral College map illustrates Johnson’s landslide victory and Goldwater’s concentrated regional support in the Deep South and Arizona. These patterns reveal how conservative messages resonated unevenly across the nation. The map includes full national results, offering broader electoral context than the syllabus specifically requires. Source.
The Conservative Coalition and Political Realignment
Building Alliances Across Regions
The 1960s conservative movement united diverse groups:
Suburban middle-class voters concerned about taxes and social change
Southern whites resisting civil rights legislation and federal enforcement
Business leaders opposing regulation
Religious conservatives alarmed by cultural liberalization
This coalition emerged as a powerful force, challenging Democratic dominance.
Opposition to the Great Society
Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs—such as Medicare, Medicaid, and anti-poverty initiatives—reinforced conservative fears of expanding federal bureaucracy. Many critics argued that:
Social programs encouraged dependency
Washington overstepped its constitutional limits
High taxation burdened economic growth
These arguments would heavily influence later political debates on welfare and deregulation.
The Legacy of the Conservative Turn
By the end of the 1960s, conservatism had reshaped political discourse by placing limits on federal ambition, elevating traditional cultural values, and advocating resolute foreign policy. Though not yet dominant, the movement laid crucial groundwork for the political shifts of the 1970s and the rise of modern conservatism.
FAQ
The backlash among many white Southerners to federal civil rights enforcement helped shift the region’s political alignment. Conservatives capitalised on this discontent by advocating states’ rights and resisting what they framed as federal intrusion.
This emerging alliance integrated Southern voters into a growing conservative coalition, reshaping national party dynamics by the end of the decade.
Anti-communism served as a broad unifying framework that linked economic conservatives, religious traditionalists, and foreign-policy hawks. Each group could interpret communism as a threat to their priorities.
Economic conservatives saw it as hostile to free markets.
Religious conservatives viewed it as morally corrosive and atheistic.
National security advocates considered it a geopolitical danger requiring military strength.
Suburban communities often attracted middle-class families seeking lower taxes, safer neighbourhoods, and local control of schools. These priorities aligned well with conservative critiques of federal expansion.
Suburban residents also tended to support policies promoting property rights and limiting welfare spending, reinforcing a political environment receptive to conservative arguments during the 1960s.
Activists built networks through churches, local associations, and issue-based groups opposing liberal reforms. Many relied on newsletters, community meetings, and door-to-door mobilisation to spread their message.
This local infrastructure allowed conservatives to cultivate committed volunteers, influence party conventions, and eventually reshape the Republican Party from the bottom up.
Many conservatives argued that expanding federal programmes and court decisions displaced local authority, which they saw as the foundation of stable communities. They believed that centralised policymaking disrupted long-standing institutions such as churches, civic groups, and the family.
They also viewed rapid cultural changes of the 1960s as symptomatic of declining discipline and moral cohesion, which they linked to liberal policies encouraging individualism and permissiveness.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (1–3 marks)
Identify one reason why many conservatives in the 1960s opposed the decisions of the Warren Court.
Question 1
1 mark for identifying a valid reason (e.g., belief that the Court expanded rights beyond the Constitution).
1 additional mark for explaining why conservatives viewed this as judicial overreach.
1 additional mark for linking this criticism to broader conservative concerns about federal power or cultural change.
Question 2 (4–6 marks)
Explain how the 1964 presidential campaign of Barry Goldwater contributed to the rise of the conservative movement in the 1960s.
Question 2
1 mark for identifying Goldwater as a key figure shaping modern conservatism.
1 mark for describing one of his major ideological positions (e.g., limited federal government, strong anti-communism).
1 mark for explaining how his campaign mobilised grassroots conservative supporters.
1 mark for referencing regional support, such as the Sun Belt, as evidence of shifting political alliances.
1 mark for explaining how his defeat still contributed to long-term conservative realignment.
1 additional mark for connecting these developments to wider political or cultural shifts in the decade.
