TutorChase logo
Login
AQA A-Level History Study Notes

2.1.3 Social Policies and Religious Pluralism

Social policies and religious pluralism under Ferdinand and Isabella demonstrate how monarchy shaped society by controlling diverse groups, enforcing orthodoxy, and consolidating political power.

Crown Policy Toward Key Social Groups

The Aristocracy

The Castilian and Aragonese aristocracies were both pillars of the late medieval political structure and obstacles to monarchical authority. Their wealth, military strength, and long-standing privileges made them potential rivals to royal control.

  • Power of the Nobility: During the 15th century, noble families had amassed significant power by taking advantage of weak monarchs and internal conflicts such as the Castilian Civil War. They ruled vast estates almost like mini-kingdoms, often with their own laws, tax systems, and armed retainers.

  • Policy of Containment and Co-optation:

    • Ferdinand and Isabella pursued a dual strategy: limiting noble autonomy while integrating them into the royal system.

    • They banned the construction of new castles unless licensed by the Crown, depriving the nobility of a key symbol and tool of independent power.

    • Títulos nobiliarios (noble titles) were carefully managed—new titles were selectively granted to ensure political loyalty.

    • The monarchs reformed the Cortes, reducing its legislative role and ensuring that nobles remained dependent on royal patronage.

  • Royal Councils:

    • Aristocrats were appointed to royal advisory bodies such as the Consejo Real (Royal Council), making them stakeholders in governance.

    • This inclusion served to dilute any rebellious tendencies and brought noble ambitions under the Crown’s scrutiny.

The Peasantry

The peasant majority, although politically marginal, represented the economic backbone of Spanish society. Policies toward them were primarily aimed at maintaining order and extracting revenue.

  • Social Status: The peasantry was divided between free peasants and serfs (particularly in Aragon), though the distinctions blurred over time. Most lived in poverty and were heavily taxed.

  • Law Enforcement and Order:

    • The establishment of the Santa Hermandad (Holy Brotherhood) in 1476 was crucial. It was a militarised policing force made up of rural towns, authorised to pursue bandits and enforce royal justice.

    • This institution effectively limited noble lawlessness and protected peasant communities from feudal violence.

  • Economic Exploitation:

    • Castile in particular imposed heavy taxes such as the alcabala, a 10 percent sales tax on goods that applied to all transactions.

    • Labour obligations, tithes to the Church, and local feudal dues created a crippling economic burden for rural communities.

  • Support for the Mesta:

    • The Mesta, a powerful guild of sheep farmers, received extensive royal privileges. Its migratory flocks often trampled peasant farmland, leading to disputes and long-term agricultural damage.

Urban Elites

Urban elites, including merchants, lawyers, and bureaucrats, were indispensable to the centralising efforts of the monarchy. Cities, especially in Castile, were wealthier and more commercially active than rural areas.

  • Urban Governance:

    • The monarchs appointed corregidores, or royal governors, to major towns. These officials were empowered to oversee justice, taxation, and local government.

    • While local elites retained some influence in town councils (ayuntamientos or concejos), their authority was increasingly subject to Crown oversight.

  • Economic Role:

    • Urban elites were the main contributors to extraordinary taxes, such as the servicio (a grant of money voted by the Cortes).

    • In return, they received privileges such as tax exemptions and monopolies, incentivising loyalty to the monarchy.

  • Legal and Bureaucratic Service:

    • The Crown increasingly relied on legists (trained lawyers) drawn from urban backgrounds to fill posts in the royal bureaucracy.

    • These individuals promoted the ideals of centralisation, uniformity, and absolutism, which supported the monarchs’ vision of an orderly, unified Spain.

The Catholic Church

The alliance between the Crown and the Catholic Church was a defining element of Ferdinand and Isabella’s reign. Religion was used not only to justify royal power but also to structure and police society.

  • Royal Patronage (Patronato Real):

    • The monarchs obtained the right to nominate bishops and abbots in their realms—a significant transfer of ecclesiastical power from Rome to the monarchy.

    • This allowed them to place loyal and reform-minded clerics in positions of influence, ensuring that the Church functioned as an arm of the state.

  • Clerical Reform:

    • They supported efforts to improve clerical discipline, literacy, and piety, especially under Cardinal Cisneros, who led the reform of the Spanish Church from 1495.

    • Reforms included visitation campaigns (inspections), the founding of seminaries, and the correction of immoral or absent clerics.

  • Ideological Support:

    • The Church consistently preached the divine right of the monarchs and encouraged obedience to secular authority as a Christian duty.

    • Religious festivals, rituals, and sermons were used to reinforce the monarchs’ role as "Catholic Kings" (Reyes Católicos) and defenders of Christendom.

Muslims and Moriscos

After the Reconquista

The conquest of Granada in 1492 marked the end of Muslim sovereignty in the Iberian Peninsula. The subsequent treatment of Muslims reflected a shift from initial tolerance to repression and forced assimilation.

  • Treaty of Granada (1491):

    • This treaty initially guaranteed Muslims in Granada the right to retain their religion, language, customs, and property.

    • However, these terms were increasingly ignored after 1499, when Cardinal Cisneros initiated a programme of forced conversions in Granada.

  • Forced Conversion and Repression:

    • Muslims who converted were known as Moriscos. These conversions were often insincere, and many Moriscos continued to practise Islam in secret.

    • From 1502, Islam was officially banned in Castile, and Muslims were given the stark choice of conversion or exile.

    • Traditional Muslim dress, names, and the Arabic language were prohibited by decree, with transgressors subject to punishment by both secular and religious courts.

Social Status and Surveillance

  • Segregation: Moriscos were often forced into ghetto-like communities, where they were kept under close scrutiny.

  • Economic Limitations: Despite being skilled artisans and farmers, Moriscos were frequently excluded from prestigious guilds and public positions.

  • Legal Restrictions:

    • They were often barred from carrying weapons, riding horses, or wearing certain types of clothing.

    • Laws required them to prove their Christian devotion regularly, and they were subject to frequent denunciations.

Jews and Conversos

Pre-Expulsion Dynamics

Jews had lived in Spain for centuries and had established vibrant communities in many towns and cities.

  • Economic Roles:

    • Many served as bankers, tax farmers, doctors, and royal administrators, making them valuable but also resented.

    • Their literacy and urban concentration made them particularly visible targets for hostility.

Conversos and Social Tension

  • Mass Conversions:

    • After anti-Jewish riots in 1391, large numbers of Jews converted to Christianity, forming a new class of conversos or New Christians.

    • These conversos often rose to positions of influence, provoking resentment among Old Christians, who questioned the sincerity of their faith.

  • Accusations of Heresy:

    • Many conversos were accused of secretly practising Judaism. These accusations, whether true or false, became a pretext for persecution and social exclusion.

1492 Expulsion

  • Alhambra Decree:

    • This edict gave Jews the choice of conversion or expulsion from Spain.

    • Between 40,000 and 80,000 Jews left, often to Portugal, the Ottoman Empire, or North Africa. Many others converted under duress.

  • Motivations:

    • Officially framed as a religious decision, the decree was also motivated by a desire to unify the realm under one faith, to eliminate a scapegoated minority, and to remove any remaining influence of non-Christian culture.

The Spanish Inquisition

Establishment and Aims

The Spanish Inquisition was a state-controlled religious court established in 1478 with the papal bull Exigit Sincerae Devotionis.

  • Main Goal: To ensure the orthodoxy of conversos and later Moriscos, ensuring they truly adhered to Christian doctrine.

  • Controlled by the Crown: Although nominally under papal authority, the Inquisition was staffed, funded, and directed by the Spanish monarchy.

  • Symbol of Authority: It became a hallmark of the Crown's commitment to religious unity and political discipline.

Inquisitorial Procedures

  • Trials:

    • Accusations were often anonymous. Suspects were arrested, interrogated, and frequently tortured.

    • Verdicts ranged from penance to execution; public punishments were delivered at autos-da-fé, dramatic public ceremonies intended to terrify and educate.

  • Seizure of Property: The accused had their assets confiscated, enriching the state and deterring potential dissenters.

  • Expansion of Power:

    • Over time, the Inquisition expanded to monitor other perceived heresies, including Lutheranism and witchcraft, although conversos remained its primary target.

Religious Intolerance as a Tool of Control

Political Motivations

  • Instrument of Centralisation:

    • Religious intolerance allowed the monarchy to crush resistance, weaken alternative power bases, and streamline governance.

  • Blood Purity Laws (Limpieza de Sangre):

    • These laws barred individuals with Jewish or Muslim ancestry from holding positions in the Church, universities, or royal service.

    • These restrictions effectively divided society along genealogical lines, reinforcing royal ideology.

Mobilising Popular Support

  • Harnessing Prejudice:

    • Anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim attitudes had deep historical roots in Iberian society. The monarchy tapped into these to rally popular support.

  • Diverting Dissent:

    • By focusing hatred on religious minorities, the Crown diverted public attention from political or economic discontent.

    • This tactic gave the illusion of national unity while avoiding more difficult structural reforms.

Long-Term Impact

  • Economic Losses:

    • The expulsion of Jews and marginalisation of Moriscos deprived Spain of valuable human capital, especially in trade, medicine, and agriculture.

  • Social Rigidity:

    • The enforcement of religious and ethnic purity entrenched social stratification and discouraged innovation.

  • Ideological Uniformity:

    • Spain emerged as a global Catholic power, but at the cost of intellectual and cultural dynamism.

By 1516, Ferdinand and Isabella had transformed Spain into a confessional state in which Catholicism was not only the dominant religion but also a tool for political consolidation, social control, and national identity. Their policies left a legacy of exclusion and repression that shaped Spanish society for generations.

FAQ

The Spanish monarchy’s emphasis on enforcing religious orthodoxy was rooted in both ideological and political motivations. Ideologically, Ferdinand and Isabella were devout Catholics who believed their rule was divinely ordained to defend the faith. Their title “Catholic Monarchs,” granted by the Pope in 1494, reflected their dedication to promoting Catholic unity within their territories. Politically, enforcing religious orthodoxy served as a powerful tool of state-building. Spain in the late 15th century was a patchwork of diverse cultures, languages, and traditions; the monarchy used religion to forge a shared national identity. By insisting on Catholic conformity, the monarchs could marginalise alternative sources of authority—such as Jewish and Muslim communities—that might challenge centralised control. Furthermore, orthodoxy provided a means of surveillance: institutions like the Inquisition allowed the monarchy to root out heresy while also eliminating political opposition disguised as religious dissent. Religious orthodoxy became a mechanism for unifying and controlling Spain under one monarch, one Church, and one faith.

The Spanish Inquisition operated as a centralised religious tribunal with extensive powers that deeply affected everyday life. Inquisitors were appointed by the Crown and held jurisdiction across dioceses, often travelling to towns and cities to hold hearings. Upon arrival, they issued an Edict of Grace, allowing people a short period to confess heresy and denounce others in exchange for leniency. Trials followed a secretive and bureaucratic process, often lasting months. Accused individuals were imprisoned without knowing their accuser, subjected to interrogation and, at times, torture to extract confessions. Punishments ranged from penance and fines to confiscation of property and public execution in an auto-da-fé. The presence of the Inquisition created an atmosphere of fear and suspicion—families were cautious about speaking freely, and denunciations were common, whether sincere or motivated by personal vendettas. Its impact on ordinary life was profound, promoting conformity, discouraging dissent, and fostering a culture of surveillance and religious anxiety across society.

The expulsion of the Jews in 1492 had profound and lasting consequences for Spain’s economy and social fabric. Jews had been integral to various sectors: they were prominent in finance, medicine, administration, and commerce. Their sudden removal disrupted economic networks, especially in towns where Jewish merchants and moneylenders were critical to local markets. The loss of tax-paying subjects also reduced royal revenue in the short term. Although some conversos remained and continued economic activity, they did so under constant suspicion, limiting their long-term contribution. Socially, the expulsion marked the beginning of a more insular and intolerant society, where purity of blood (limpieza de sangre) became a dominant social marker, breeding division and paranoia. The event also served as a precedent for future exclusions, notably the treatment of Moriscos. Ultimately, while the Crown portrayed the expulsion as a moral and religious victory, it led to intellectual stagnation, economic regression in some urban centres, and entrenched a rigid, exclusionary national identity.

While both Jews and Muslims faced coercive religious policies, the treatment of Moriscos—Muslims who converted to Christianity—differed in key ways. After the conquest of Granada, Muslims were initially promised freedom of religion under the Treaty of Granada (1491), unlike Jews who were immediately forced to convert or leave in 1492. However, from 1499 onwards, forced conversions of Muslims began, especially under Cardinal Cisneros. Unlike Jews, who were expelled outright unless they converted, Muslims were systematically coerced into converting and then closely monitored as Moriscos. Moriscos often retained Islamic cultural practices, leading to increased scrutiny and repression. Unlike conversos, Moriscos were usually poorer, rural, and less assimilated into urban Christian society, making them more visible and vulnerable. Additionally, while conversos could sometimes rise to prominence, Moriscos remained socially marginalised. Policies towards them included bans on Arabic, restrictions on dress, and enforced cultural assimilation. Though not expelled during this period, Moriscos faced harsher cultural erasure and surveillance than conversos.

The monarchy’s religious policies had a notable impact on education and literacy, particularly in promoting Catholic doctrine and suppressing heterodox thought. Ferdinand and Isabella, through their control of the Patronato Real, influenced ecclesiastical appointments and the religious orientation of education. They supported institutions like the University of Alcalá, founded in 1499 by Cardinal Cisneros, which aimed to produce well-educated clergy loyal to Crown and Church. The university became a centre for Christian humanism, scriptural scholarship, and theological training, with a curriculum focused on Latin, canon law, and orthodox Catholic texts. However, this promotion of education was tightly regulated; literacy was encouraged only insofar as it served religious orthodoxy. The printing of vernacular Bibles and texts deemed heretical was banned, and intellectuals associated with heterodox ideas faced censure or Inquisition proceedings. As a result, educational reform under the Catholic Monarchs advanced clerical competence and religious instruction but discouraged broader intellectual pluralism, setting the tone for future censorship and cultural isolation in Spain.

Practice Questions

To what extent did the Spanish monarchy’s treatment of religious minorities strengthen royal authority in the years 1469–1516?

The Spanish monarchy’s treatment of religious minorities, especially Jews and Muslims, significantly strengthened royal authority by promoting religious unity and eliminating alternative power bases. The expulsion of Jews in 1492 and forced conversion of Muslims after 1502 removed dissenting voices and projected the image of a unified Christian kingdom. The Inquisition reinforced this control through fear and surveillance, increasing Crown dominance over society. However, while it unified Spain ideologically, it also alienated valuable minorities and created long-term divisions. Thus, religious policy was crucial to royal consolidation, though it came at the cost of economic and social cohesion.

Assess the significance of the Santa Hermandad in consolidating monarchical control over Castile.

The Santa Hermandad played a vital role in consolidating monarchical authority in Castile by extending royal justice into local communities and curbing noble lawlessness. Its establishment in 1476 created a standing police force that enforced order, collected taxes, and subdued banditry, reducing reliance on feudal lords for security. It signalled a shift towards centralised governance and demonstrated the monarchy’s capacity to protect subjects. While temporary and limited geographically, it symbolised the Crown’s determination to impose law and order. Though not a long-term institution, its immediate impact was instrumental in restoring public confidence in the monarchy and weakening noble autonomy.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email