AP Syllabus focus:
‘During the Washington and Adams administrations, political leaders built institutions and precedents that put constitutional principles into practice in the new federal government.’
Early presidential administrations shaped how the new constitutional system functioned. Through key decisions, policies, and crises, Washington and Adams established durable precedents defining federal authority and political practice.
Building the Executive Branch
The earliest administrations had to interpret the Constitution’s broad framework and convert its principles into functioning institutions. Washington’s presidency was especially significant because nearly every choice had long-term implications.
Establishing Executive Departments
Washington oversaw the creation of the executive departments, including State, Treasury, and War, which structured federal administration. He appointed skilled leaders such as Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and Henry Knox, demonstrating an early precedent for balancing competing political viewpoints in the cabinet.

This engraving shows President George Washington with his first cabinet—Henry Knox, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and Edmund Randolph—highlighting the early development of executive leadership. It reflects how Washington established a precedent for selecting experienced advisers to guide major departments. The image includes artistic details such as period clothing and facial expressions not required by the syllabus but helpful for historical context. Source.
Precedent of the Presidential Cabinet
Although the Constitution does not mandate a cabinet, Washington began convening department heads for advice, creating a cabinet precedent followed by all later presidents.
Presidential Cabinet: A group of appointed executive officials who advise the president and oversee major administrative departments.
This practice shaped how future presidents coordinated policy and exercised executive authority.
Federal Authority and Constitutional Interpretation
Washington and Adams both navigated uncertainty about the limits and scope of federal power. Through their decisions, they contributed to the development of federal supremacy and implied powers doctrines that became central to the constitutional system.
Hamilton’s Financial Program
Hamilton’s plans for assumption of state debts, creation of a national bank, and encouragement of manufacturing sparked debates over constitutional interpretation. Supporters invoked implied powers, claiming the Constitution allowed necessary actions for carrying out enumerated responsibilities, while critics favored strict construction. Washington’s approval of the Bank of the United States strengthened the precedent for a flexible reading of federal authority.
The Whiskey Rebellion and Enforcement of Federal Law
In 1794, western Pennsylvania farmers resisted a federal excise tax on whiskey. Washington responded by mobilizing state militias to enforce federal authority.
Demonstrated the federal government’s ability and willingness to enforce its laws
Reinforced constitutional supremacy over regional resistance
Signaled the shift from the weak government under the Articles of Confederation
This moment became a defining precedent for federal law enforcement and the stability of republican government.

This painting illustrates the frontier environment in which the Whiskey Rebellion emerged, including barrels of distilled liquor, wagons, and rural homesteads. It helps contextualize the economic conditions that shaped resistance to the federal excise tax. The image contains additional scenic and occupational details beyond the syllabus but remains relevant to understanding the rebellion’s setting. Source.
Foreign Policy Precedents
Foreign affairs were central to early presidential leadership. Washington and Adams set patterns for neutrality, diplomacy, and executive control over international relations.
Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation
The outbreak of European war in 1793 forced the United States to navigate alliances from the Revolutionary era. Washington issued the Neutrality Proclamation, asserting the president’s authority to determine foreign policy direction.
Reinforced the executive’s leading role in diplomacy
Sought to protect U.S. trade and independence
Established a precedent for avoiding entangling alliances
This foundational principle shaped American foreign policy for generations.
Diplomatic Challenges Under Adams
Adams confronted strained relations with France during the Quasi-War, an undeclared naval conflict. The XYZ Affair, in which French agents demanded bribes from American envoys, inflamed public opinion and tested diplomatic integrity.
Adams strengthened the navy and pursued defensive measures while resisting pressures for a full-scale war, setting a precedent for cautious, constitutional executive decision-making during international crises.
Political Conflict and Executive Power
The 1790s saw the rise of political factions, even though Washington warned against them. Both administrations confronted the challenge of governing amid intensifying partisan conflict.
Rise of Political Parties
Disagreements between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans shaped debates on federal power, economic policy, and foreign alignment. The emergence of organized parties influenced legislative decision-making and electoral politics, establishing a pattern of partisan competition.
The Jay Treaty and Executive Authority
Washington’s support for the Jay Treaty with Britain displayed the president’s diplomatic leadership and tested the Senate’s treaty-approval role. Despite fierce opposition, Washington defended the treaty’s constitutionality, reinforcing executive responsibility for negotiating agreements.
The Alien and Sedition Acts
Under Adams, Federalist concerns about national security during the Quasi-War led to passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts, which expanded federal authority over immigration and criminalized criticism of the government. These laws ignited debates over civil liberties and constitutional limits on federal power.
Sedition: Conduct or speech inciting resistance to lawful authority.
The acts provoked strong Democratic-Republican opposition and influenced future understandings of free speech and the scope of executive power.
Presidential Norms and Constitutional Practice
Both Washington and Adams shaped expectations for presidential behavior and national political culture.
Washington’s Voluntary Retirement
Washington’s decision to step down after two terms established an informal two-term precedent later codified in the 22nd Amendment.

This painting depicts Washington formally relinquishing military authority before Congress, highlighting his commitment to republican principles and the peaceful surrender of power. It visually parallels his later choice to step down after two presidential terms. The architectural surroundings and spectators provide additional contextual detail not required by the syllabus but helpful in illustrating the gravity of the moment. Source.
Adams and the Peaceful Transfer of Power
Although Adams lost the election of 1800, he accepted the result and transferred power peacefully to Thomas Jefferson. This precedent reinforced constitutional legitimacy and the expectation of orderly transitions between opposing parties.
Washington’s Farewell Address
Washington’s Farewell Address, though not part of the subsubtopic’s core requirement, helps contextualize his role in shaping political norms. His warnings about factionalism and foreign entanglements reflected his effort to stabilize the republic and guide future leaders.
Building a Functional Federal Government
Together, the Washington and Adams administrations established crucial precedents that operationalized constitutional principles. Their policies and decisions defined federal authority, executive leadership, party politics, and diplomatic strategy, laying the foundation for future governance in the new republic.
FAQ
Washington prioritised regional balance, political diversity, and proven administrative or military ability. He selected figures with strong reputations in their respective fields, even when they disagreed with each other.
He also believed the new nation needed respected leaders who could lend legitimacy to federal authority, so he drew on well-known Revolutionary figures such as Jefferson, Hamilton, and Knox.
This approach reflected his desire for broad national unity rather than narrow factional alignment.
Many Americans viewed the peaceful suppression of the rebellion as evidence that the federal government could maintain order without replicating monarchical oppression.
It also reassured creditors, foreign governments, and cautious state leaders that the United States was capable of enforcing taxation and law.
However, some critics argued that the show of force was excessive, helping to fuel emerging partisan divides.
Adams inherited a more volatile international environment, particularly the deterioration of relations with France. Unlike Washington, he pursued naval expansion and defensive measures while still working to avoid full-scale war.
Key differences included:
Greater reliance on naval power
More frequent engagement with Congress on foreign policy
A willingness to negotiate even after public outrage (as in the aftermath of the XYZ Affair)
These differences reflected Adams’ more reactive, crisis-driven presidency.
Some Federalists feared the laws risked alienating moderate voters and damaging the party’s reputation for defending constitutional order.
Critics within the party also questioned whether expanding executive power during peacetime set a dangerous precedent.
The acts raised practical concerns as well, including inconsistent enforcement and the potential for retaliatory policies affecting Americans abroad.
Washington was physically exhausted by political conflict and increasingly frustrated by partisan attacks on his leadership.
Other influences included:
His desire to retire to Mount Vernon
A belief that continued service might encourage dependence on a single leader
Concerns that prolonged tenure could erode public trust in constitutional limits
These personal and political considerations reinforced the broader republican message of voluntary restraint in executive power.
Practice Questions
Question 1 (1–3 marks)
Explain one way in which George Washington established an important precedent for the operation of the executive branch during his presidency.
Mark scheme:
1 mark for identifying a valid precedent (e.g., creation of a presidential cabinet, two-term tradition, neutrality in foreign affairs).
1 mark for describing how this precedent functioned or what it involved.
1 mark for explaining why it was significant for the future operation of the executive branch.
Question 2 (4–6 marks)
Assess the extent to which the Washington and Adams administrations strengthened the authority of the federal government in the 1790s.
Mark scheme:
1 mark for a clear argument or thesis addressing the extent of strengthened federal authority.
1–2 marks for accurate description of relevant actions or policies (e.g., response to the Whiskey Rebellion, creation of executive departments, approval of the National Bank, the Alien and Sedition Acts, diplomatic leadership).
1–2 marks for analysis explaining how these actions expanded, tested, or legitimised federal power.
1 mark for use of specific historical evidence (e.g., dates, acts, political figures) to support the argument.
